Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 505–516 | Cite as

Born to cope with climate change? Experimentally manipulated hatching time does not affect duckling survival in the mallard Anas platyrhynchos

  • Kjell Sjöberg
  • Gunnar GunnarssonEmail author
  • Hannu Pöysä
  • Johan Elmberg
  • Petri Nummi
Original Paper

Abstract

Two main hypotheses proposed to explain the seasonal decline in reproductive performance in birds are (1) deterioration of environmental conditions and (2) lower parental quality of late breeders. Previous experimental work addressing these hypotheses generally have problematic biases pertaining to delay of hatching, costs of re-laying and incubation, as well as variation in the quality of eggs, territories, offspring and parental traits. We address these biases in an experimental test of the timing hypothesis (i.e. (1) above) in a precocial bird. Using a 2-year cross-over design and game-farm mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) eggs originating from a number of hens and a standardised delay procedure, we introduced early and late broods with a foster female onto boreal oligotrophic lakes and monitored subsequent duckling survival. Standardised invertebrate sampling was done concurrently to get a measure of lake-level abundance of aquatic prey, a likely causative agent of putative seasonal difference in duckling survival. Survival data and covariates (duckling age; days) were analysed by an information theoretic approach. There was no effect of treatment (i.e. manipulation of hatching date) on duckling survival, which was higher in 2005 than in 2004. In contrast to observational studies from more seasonal wetlands, our experiment demonstrates that duckling survival on boreal lakes was not affected by a 12-day delay in hatching date. Since we did not find any consistent trends in abundance of aquatic prey, i.e. neither clear peaks nor differences between treatment periods, we hypothesise that moderate climate change has minor effects on resource abundance and hence also on mallard duckling survival in boreal environments.

Keywords

Breeding biology Duckling mortality Mismatch hypothesis Timing of breeding Waterfowl 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Göran Karlsson for skilful work with eggs and ducks at the Boda Game Station. Per Wedholm, Eric Andersson, Johan Nilsson and Åke Nordström are gratefully acknowledged for field work assistance. The research was supported by grant V 98-04 from The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (Naturvårdsverket).

References

  1. Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J Wildl Manage 74:1175–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold JM, HJ J, Nisbet CT (2004) Seasonal declines in reproductive success of the common tern Sterna hirundo: timing or parental quality? J Avian Biol 35:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball IJ, Gilmer DS, Cowardin LM, Riechmann JH (1975) Survival of wood duck and mallard broods in north-central Minnesota. J Wildl Manage 39:776–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batt BDJ, Prince HH (1979) Laying dates, clutch size and egg weight of captive mallards. Condor 81:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Both C, te Marvelde L (2007) Climate change and timing of avian breeding and migration throughout Europe. Clim Res 35:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Both C, Artemyev AV, Blaauw B, Cowie RJ, Dekhuijzen AJ, Eeva T, Enemar A, Gustafsson L, Ivankina EV, Järvinen A, Metcalfe NB, Nyholm NEI, Potti J, Ravussin P-A, Sanz JJ, Silverin B, Slater FM, Sokolov LV, Török J, Winkel W, Wright J, Zang H, Visser ME (2004) Large-scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 271:1657–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Both C, Biljsma RG, Visser ME (2005) Climatic effects on timing of spring migration and breeding in a long-distance migrant, the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. J Avian Biol 36:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinkhof MWG, Cavé AJ, Hage FJ, Verhulst S (1993) Timing of reproduction and fledging success in the coot Fulica atra: evidence for a causal relationship. J Anim Ecol 62:577–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown JL, Shou-Shien L, Bhagabati N (1999) Long-term trend toward earlier breeding in an American bird: a response to global warming? PNAS 96:5565–5569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Chouinard MP Jr, Arnold TW (2007) Survival and habitat use of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) broods in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Auk 1305–1316:1305–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock TH (1988) Reproductive success. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 472–486Google Scholar
  13. Cox RR, Hanson MA, Roy CC, Euliss NH, Johnson DH, Butler MG (1998) Mallard duckling growth and survival in relation to aquatic invertebrates. J Wildl Manage 62:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1977) The birds of the western Palearctic. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Crick HQP, Wingfield Gibbons D, Magrath RD (1993) Seasonal changes in clutch size in British birds. J Anim Ecol 62:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cunningham EJA, Russell AF (2000) Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404:74–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Danell K, Sjöberg K (1977) Seasonal emergence of chironomids in relation to egglaying and hatching in a restored lake (northern Sweden). Wildfowl 28:129–135Google Scholar
  18. Dessborn L, Elmberg J, Nummi P, Pöysä H, Sjöberg K (2009) Hatching in dabbling ducks and emergence in chironomids: a case of predator–prey synchrony? Hydrobiologia 636:319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doherty PF Jr, Nichols JD, Tuatin J, Voelzer JF, Smith GW, Benning DS, Bentley VR, Bidwell JK, Bollinger KS, Brazda AR, Buelna EK, Goldsberry JR, King RJ, Roetker FH, Solberg JW, Thorpe PP, Wortham JS (2002) Sources of variation in breeding-ground fidelity of mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). Behav Ecol 13:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drever MC, Clark RG (2007) Spring temperature, clutch initiation date and duck nest success: a test of the mismatch hypothesis. J Anim Ecol 76:139–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunn PO, Winkler DW (1999) Climate change has affected the breeding date of tree swallows throughout North America. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 266:2487–2490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dzus EH, Clark RG (1997) Overland travel, food abundance, and wetland use by mallards: relationships with offspring survival. Wilson Bull 109:504–515Google Scholar
  23. Dzus EH, Clark RG (1998) Brood survival and recruitment of mallards in relation to wetland density and hatching date. Auk 115:311–318Google Scholar
  24. Elmberg J, Nummi P, Pöysä H, Sjöberg K (1992) Do intruding predators and trap position affect the reliability of catches in activity traps? Hydrobiologia 239:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elmberg J, Nummi P, Pöysä H, Sjöberg K (1993) Factors affecting species number and density of dabbling duck guilds in North Europe. Ecography 16:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elmberg J, Gunnarsson G, Pöysä H, Sjöberg K, Nummi P (2005a) Within-season sequential density dependence regulates breeding success in mallards Anas platyrhynchos. Oikos 108:582–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elmberg J, Nummi P, Pöysä H, Gunnarsson G, Sjöberg K (2005b) Early breeding teal Anas crecca use the best lakes and have the highest reproductive success. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42:37–43Google Scholar
  28. Elmberg J, Nummi P, Pöysä H, Sjöberg K, Gunnarsson G, Clausen P, Guillemain M, Rodrigues D, Väänänen V-M (2006) The scientific basis for a new and sustainable management of migratory European ducks. Wildl Biol 12:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Elmberg J, Folkesson K, Guillemain M, Gunnarsson G (2009) Putting density dependence in perspective: nest density, nesting phenology, and biome, all matter to survival of simulated mallard Anas platyrhynchos nests. J Avian Biol 40:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fransson T, Pettersson J (2001) Svensk ringmärkningsatlas [Swedish bird ringing atlas]. Ljungföretagen Tryckeri AB, ÖrebroGoogle Scholar
  31. Gendron M, Clark RG (2002) Survival of gadwall and mallard ducklings in southcentral Saskatchewan. J Wildl Manag 66:170–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gunnarsson G, Elmberg J, Sjöberg K, Pöysä H, Nummi P (2004) Why are there so many empty lakes? Food limits survival of mallard ducklings. Can J Zool 82:1698–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gunnarsson G, Elmberg J, Sjöberg K, Pöysä H, Nummi P (2006) Experimental evidence for density-dependent survival in mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) ducklings. Oecologia 149:203–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamann J, Cooke F (1989) Intra-seasonal decline of clutch size in lesser snow geese. Oecologia 79:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D (2000) The quality and timing hypotheses evaluated using data on great reed warblers. Oikos 90:575–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heaney V, Monaghan P (1995) A within-clutch trade-off between egg production and rearing in birds. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 261:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hill DA (1984) Laying date, clutch size and egg size of the mallard Anas platyrhynchos and tufted duck Aythya fuligula. Ibis 126:484–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill D, Wright R, Street M (1987) Survival of mallard ducklings Anas platyrhynchos and competition with fish for invertebrates on a flooded gravel quarry in England. Ibis 129:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoekman ST, Gabor TS, Maher R, Murkin HR, Armstrong LM (2004) Factors affecting survival of mallard ducklings in southern Ontario. Condor 106:485–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson FA, Moore CT, Kendall WL, Dubovsky JA, Caithamer DF, Kelley JR, Williams BK (1997) Uncertainty and the management of mallard harvests. J Wildl Manag 61:202–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson WC, Millett BV, Gilmanov T, Voldseth RA, Guntenspergen GR, Naugle DE (2005) Vulnerability of northern prairie wetlands to climate change. Bioscience 55:863–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kanstrup N (2006) Sustainable harvest of waterbirds: a global review. In: Boere GC, Calbraith CA, Stroud DA (eds) Waterbirds around the world. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, pp 98–106Google Scholar
  43. Kauppinen J (1993) Densities and habitat distribution of breeding waterfowl in boreal lakes in Finland. Finn Game Res 48:24–45Google Scholar
  44. Kauppinen J, Väisänen RA (1993) Ordination and classification of waterfowl communities in south boreal lakes. Finn Game Res 48:3–23Google Scholar
  45. Kear J, Jones T, Matthews GVT (2005) Conservation and management. In: Kear J (ed) Ducks, geese and swans, vol 1. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 152–171Google Scholar
  46. Klomp H (1970) The determination of clutch-size in birds. Ardea 58:1–124Google Scholar
  47. Koskimies J, Lahti L (1964) Cold-hardiness of the newly hatched young in relation to ecology and distribution in ten species of European ducks. Auk 81:281–307Google Scholar
  48. Koskimies P, Väisänen R (1991) Monitoring bird populations. Zoological Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  49. Krapu GL, Pietz PJ, Brandt DA, Cox RR (2000) Factors limiting mallard brood survival in prairie pothole landscapes. J Wildl Manag 64:553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laaksonen T, Ahola M, Eeva T, Väisänen RA, Lehikoinen E (2006) Climate change, migratory connectivity and changes in laying date and clutch size of the pied flycatcher. Oikos 114:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Laurila T, Hario M (1988) Environmental and genetic factors influencing clutch size, egg volume, date of laying and female weight in the common eider Somateria mollissima. Finn Game Res 45:19–30Google Scholar
  52. Lebreton J-D, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lepage D, Desroches A, Gauthier G (1999) Seasonal decline of growth and fledging success in snow geese Anser caerulescens: an effect of date or parental quality? J Avian Biol 30:72–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lessells CM (1991) The evolution of life histories. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 32–68Google Scholar
  55. Lindén M, Møller AP (1989) Cost of reproduction and covariation of lifehistory traits in birds. Trends Ecol Evol 4:367–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ludwig GX, Alatalo RV, Helle P, Lindén H, Lindström J, Siitari H (2006) Short- and long-term population dynamical consequences of asymmetric climate change in black grouse. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 273:2009–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mauser DM, Jarvis RL, Gilmer DS (1994) Survival of radio-marked mallard ducklings in northeastern California. J Wildl Manag 58:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Milonoff M, Pöysä H, Virtanen J (1995) Brood-size-dependent offspring mortality in common goldeneyes reconsidered: fact or artifact? Am Nat 146:967–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Møller AP (2008) Climate change and micro-geographic variation in laying date. Oecologia 155:845–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Monaghan P, Nager RG (1997) Why don’t birds lay more eggs? Trends Ecol Evol 12:270–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nichols JD, Johnson FA, Williams BK (1995) Managing North American waterfowl in the face of uncertainty. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26:177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nilsson J-Å (1999) Fitness consequences of timing of reproduction. In: Adams NJ, Slotow RH (eds) Proceedings of 22 international ornithological congress. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, pp 234–247Google Scholar
  63. Norris K (1993) Seasonal variation in the reproductive success of blue tits: an experimental study. J Anim Ecol 62:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nudds TD, Bowlby JN (1984) Predator–prey size relationships in North American dabbling ducks. Can J Zool 62:2002–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nummi P, Sjöberg K, Pöysä H, Elmberg J (2000) Individual foraging behaviour indicates resource limitation: an experiment with mallard ducklings. Can J Zool 78:1891–1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oja H, Pöysä H (2007) Spring phenology, latitude, and the timing of breeding in two migratory ducks: implications of climate change impacts. Ann Zool Fenn 44:475–485Google Scholar
  67. Orthmeyer DL, Ball IJ (1990) Survival of mallard broods on Benton Lake National Wildlife Refuge in northcentral Montana. J Wildl Manag 54:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paasivaara A, Pöysä H (2007) Survival of common goldeneye Bucephala clangula ducklings in relation to weather, timing of breeding, brood size, and female condition. J Avian Biol 38:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pearce-Higgins JW, Yalden DW, Whittingham MJ (2005) Warmer springs advance the breeding phenology of golden plovers Pluvialis apricaria and their prey (Tipulidae). Oecologia 143:470–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pearse AT, Ratti JT (2004) Effects of predator removal on mallard duckling survival. J Wildl Manag 68:342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Perrins CM (1970) The timing of birds’ breeding season. Ibis 112:242–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Piao S, Ciais P, Friedlingstein P, Peylin P, Reichstein M, Luyssaert S, Margolis H, Fang J, Barr A, Chen A, Grelle A, Hollinger DY, Laurila T, Lindroth A, Richardson AD, Vesala T (2008) Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming. Nature 451:49–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pöysä H, Elmberg J, Sjöberg K, Nummi P (1998) Habitat selection rules in breeding mallards (Anas platyrhynchos): a test of two competing hypotheses. Oecologia 114:283–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pöysä H, Elmberg J, Gunnarsson G, Nummi P, Sjöberg K (2004) Ecological basis of sustainable harvesting: is the prevailing paradigm of compensatory mortality still valid? Oikos 104:612–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Price T, Kirkpatrick M, Arnold SJ (1988) Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. Science 240:798–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rhymer JM (1988) The effect of egg size variability on thermoregulation of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) offspring and its implications for survival. Oecologia 75:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ringelman JK, Flake LD (1980) Diurnal visibility and activity of blue-winged teal and mallard broods. J Wildl Manag 44:822–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rohwer F (1992) The evolution of reproductive patterns in waterfowl. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 486–539Google Scholar
  79. Rotella JJ, Ratti JT (1992a) Mallard brood survival and wetland habitat conditions in southwestern Manitoba. J Wildl Manag 56:499–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rotella JJ, Ratti JT (1992b) Mallard brood movements and wetland selection in southwestern Manitoba. J Wildl Manag 56:508–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sayler RD, Willms MA (1997) Brood ecology of mallards and gadwalls nesting on islands in large reservoirs. J Wildl Manag 61:808–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schoech SJ, Hahn TP (2008) Latitude affects degree of advancement in laying by birds in response to food supplementation: a meta-analysis. Oecologia 157:369–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sedinger JS (1992) Ecology of prefledgling waterfowl. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 109–127Google Scholar
  84. Simpson JW, Yerkes TJ, Smith BD, Nudds TD (2005) Mallard duckling survival in the Great Lakes region. Condor 107:898–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Simpson JW, Yerkes TJ, Nudds TD, Smith BD (2007) Effects of habitat on mallard duckling survival in the Great Lakes region. J Wildl Manag 71:1885–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sjöberg K, Pöysä H, Elmberg J, Nummi P (2000) Response of mallard ducklings to variation in habitat quality—an experiment of food limitation. Ecology 81:329–335Google Scholar
  87. Sorenson LG, Goldberg R, Root TL, Anderson MG (1998) Potential effects of global warming on waterfowl populations breeding in the Northern Great Plains. Climate Change 40:343–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stafford JD, Pearse AT (2007) Survival of radio-marked mallard ducklings in South Dakota. Wilson J Ornithology 119:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stafford JD, Flake LD, Mammenga PW (2002) Survival of mallard broods and ducklings departing overwater nesting structures in eastern South Dakota. Wildl Soc Bull 30:327–336Google Scholar
  90. Torti VM, Dunn PO (2005) Variable effects of climate change on six species of North American birds. Oecologia 145:486–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Verhulst S, Nilsson J-Å (2008) The timing of birds’ breeding season: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:399–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Verhulst S, Tinbergen JM (1991) Experimental evidence for a causal relationship between timing and success of reproduction in the great tit Parus m. major. J Anim Ecol 60:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Verhulst S, van Balen JH, Tinbergen JM (1995) Seasonal decline in reproductive success of the great tit: variation in time or quality? Ecology 76:2392–2403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Visser ME, van Noordwijk AJ, Tinbergen JM, Lessells CM (1998) Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 265:1867–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Visser ME, Adriaensen F, van Balen JH, Blondel J, Dhondt AA, van Dongen S, du Feu C, Ivankina EV, Kerimov AB, de Laet J, Matthysen E, McCleery R, Orell M, Thomson DL (2003) Variable responses to large-scale climate change in European Parus populations. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 270:367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Weatherhead PJ (2005) Effects of climate variation on timing of nesting, reproductive success, and offspring sex ratios of red-winged blackbirds. Oecologia 144:168–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study Suppl 46:120–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kjell Sjöberg
    • 1
  • Gunnar Gunnarsson
    • 2
    Email author
  • Hannu Pöysä
    • 3
  • Johan Elmberg
    • 2
  • Petri Nummi
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental StudiesSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Aquatic Biology and Chemistry GroupKristianstad UniversityKristianstadSweden
  3. 3.Finnish Game and Fisheries Research InstituteJoensuu Game and Fisheries ResearchJoensuuFinland
  4. 4.Department of Forest SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations