Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 411–419 | Cite as

Linking habitat quality with genetic diversity: a lesson from great bustards in Spain

  • Christian PitraEmail author
  • Susana Suárez-Seoane
  • Carlos A. Martín
  • Wolf-Jürgen Streich
  • Juan C. Alonso
Original Paper

Abstract

The effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on the genetic structure and variability of wild populations have received wide empirical support and theoretical formalization. By contrast, the effects of habitat quality seem largely underinvestigated, partly due to technical difficulties in properly assessing habitat quality. In this study, we combine geographic information system (GIS)-based habitat-quality modelling with a landscape genetics approach based on mitochondrial DNA markers to evaluate the possible influence of habitat quality on the levels and distribution of genetic diversity in a range of natural populations (n = 15) of Otis tarda throughout Spain. Ninety-three percent of the population represented by our countrywide sample lives in good-quality habitats, while 4.5% and 2.5% occur respectively in intermediate and poor habitats. Habitat quality was highly correlated with patch size, population size and population density, indicating the reliability and predictive power of the habitat suitability model. Genetic diversity was significantly correlated with habitat quality, size and density of the population, but not with patch size. Three of a total of 20 existing matrilineages from the species’ current genetic pool are restricted to poor-quality habitats. This study therefore highlights the importance of considering both population genetics and habitat quality in a species of high conservation priority.

Keywords

Otis tarda Geographic information systems Habitat suitability index mtDNA 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Javier Alonso, Carlos Palacín, Marina Magaña and Beatriz Martín for collaborating during fieldwork. Additional help was provided by Manuel Morales and Enrique Martín. We also thank Anke Schmidt and Dietmar Lieckfeldt for technical assistance, and P.E. Osborne for his participation in building the habitat suitability model. We also greatly appreciate the valuable comments from the editor and two anonymous reviewers. The study was financed by the Dirección General de investigación (projects PB94-0068, PB97-1252, BOS2002-01543 and CGL2008-02567).

References

  1. Alonso JC, Alonso JA (1996) The great bustard Otis tarda in Spain: present status, recent trends and an evaluation of earlier censuses. Biol Conserv 77:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso JC, Palacín C, Martín CA (2003) Status and recent trends of the great bustard (Otis tarda) population in the Iberian peninsula. Biol Conserv 110:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso JC, Martín CA, Alonso JA, Palacín C, Magana M, Lane SJ (2004) Distribution dynamics of a great bustard metapopulation throughout a decade: influence of conspecific attraction and recruitment. Biodiv Conserv 13:1659–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alonso JC, Martín CA, Palacín C, Martín B, Magaña M (2005) The great bustard Otis tarda in Andalucía, southern Spain: status, distribution and trends. Ardeola 52:67–78Google Scholar
  5. Alonso JC, Martín CA, Alonso JA, Palacín C, Magana M, Lieckfeldt D, Pitra C (2009) Genetic diversity of the great bustard in Iberia and Morocco: risks from current population fragmentation. Conserv Genet 10:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angers B, Magnan P, Plante M, Bernatchez L (1999) Canonical correspondence analysis for estimating spatial and environmental effects on microsatellite gene diversity in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Mol Ecol 8:1043–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brotons LL, Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Hirzel AH (2004) Presence–absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography 27:437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costello AB, Down TE, Pollard SM, Pacas CJ, Taylor EB (2003) The influence of history and contemporary stream hydrology on the evolution of genetic diversity within species: an examination of microsatellite DNA variation in bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus (Pisces: Salmonidae). Evolution 57:328–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eastman JR (2000) Idrisi for Windows. User’s guide, Version 32. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Elith J et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frankham R (1995) Inbreeding and conservation: a threshold effect. Conserv Biol 9:792–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv Biol 10:1500–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franklin J, Miller JA (2009) Mapping species distributions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Fulgione D, Maselli V, Pavarese G, Rippa D, Rastogi RK (2009) Landscape fragmentation and habitat suitability in endangered Italian hare (Lepus corsicanus) and European hare (Lepus europaeus) populations. Eur J Wildl Res 55:385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. García J, Suárez-Seoane S, Miguélez D, Osborne PE, Zumalacárregui C (2007) Spatial analysis of the habitat quality in a fragmented population of little bustard. Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 137:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Modell 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guisan A, Edwards TC, Hastie T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Modell 157:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson MD (2007) Measuring habitat quality: a review. Condor 109:489–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lane SJ, Alonso JC (2001) Status and extinction probabilities of great bustard (Otis tarda) in Andalusia, southern Spain. Biodiv Conserv 10:893–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lane SJ, Alonso JC, Martín CA (2001) Habitat preferences of great bustard Otis tarda flocks in the arable steppes of central Spain: are potentially suitable areas unoccupied? J Appl Ecol 38:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehmann A, Leathwick JR, Overton JMcC (2003) GRASP v.2.5 User’s manual. Landcare Research, Hamilton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  22. Martín CA, Alonso JC, Alonso JA, Pitra C, Lieckfeldt D (2002) Great bustard population structure in central Spain: concordant results from genetic analysis and dispersal study. Proc R Soc B 269:119–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meynard CN, Quinn JF (2007) Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species. J Biogeogr 34:1455–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Montgomery ME, Woodworth LM, Nurthen RK et al (2000) Relationships between population size and loss of genetic diversity: comparisons of experimental results with theoretical predictions. Conserv Genet 1:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moritz C (1994) Defining “Evolutionarily Significant Units” for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Osborne PE, Alonso JC, Bryant RG (2001) Modelling landscape-scale habitat use using GIS and remote sensing: a case study with great bustards. J Appl Ecol 38:458–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palacín C, Alonso JC (2008) An updated estimate of the world status and population trends of the Great Bustard Otis tarda. Ardeola 55:13–25Google Scholar
  29. Pearce JL, Boyce MS (2006) Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. J Appl Ecol 43:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pearce JL, Ferrier S (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Modell 133:225–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinto M, Rocha P, Moreira F (2005) Long-term trends in great bustard (Otis tarda) populations in Portugal suggest concentration in single high quality area. Biol Conserv 124:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pitra C, Lieckfeldt D, Alonso JC (2000) Population subdivision in Europe’s great bustard inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence variation. Mol Ecol 9:1165–1170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pitra C, Watzke H, Lieckfeldt D, Litzbarski H (2007) Conservation genetics of the great bustard in the Ponto-Caspian steppes (Ukraine and the lower Volga basin). Bustard Stud 6:99–110Google Scholar
  35. Rozas J, Rozas R (1997) DnaSP, Version 2.0: a novel software package for extensive molecular population genetics analysis. CABIOS 13:307–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suárez-Seoane S, Osborne PE, Alonso JC (2002) Large-scale habitat selection by agricultural steppe birds in Spain: identifying species–habitat responses using generalized additive models. J Appl Ecol 39:755–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1980) Habitat evaluation procedures (HEP). U.S Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Division Ecological Services Manual 102, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  39. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1981) Standards for the development of habitat suitability index models for use in the habitat evaluation procedure. U.S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Division Ecological Services Manual 103, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Van der Lee GEM, Van der Molen DT, Van den Boogaard HFP, Van der Klis H (2006) Uncertainty analysis of a spatial habitat suitability model and implications for ecological management of water bodies. Landscape Ecol 21:1019–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Venables WN, Ripley BD (1999) Modern applied statistics with S-Plus. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Vergeer P, Rengelink R, Copal A, Ouborg NJ (2003) The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance of Succisa pratensis. J Ecol 91:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models. An introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Pitra
    • 1
    Email author
  • Susana Suárez-Seoane
    • 2
  • Carlos A. Martín
    • 3
    • 4
  • Wolf-Jürgen Streich
    • 1
  • Juan C. Alonso
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Evolutionary GeneticsInstitute for Zoo and Wildlife ResearchBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Area de Ecología, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Gestión Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y AmbientalesUniversidad de LeónLeonSpain
  3. 3.Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC)MadridSpain
  4. 4.Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos, IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM)Ciudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations