European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 305–312 | Cite as

Space use patterns of mountain hare (Lepus timidus) on the Alps

  • Francesco Bisi
  • Mosé Nodari
  • Nuno Miguel Dos Santos Oliveira
  • Elisa Masseroni
  • Damiano G. Preatoni
  • Lucas A. Wauters
  • Guido Tosi
  • Adriano Martinoli
Original Paper

Abstract

Populations on the limits of species’ distribution can show different behavioral adaptations to strong ecological pressure than in the central part of the range. We investigated space use patterns of alpine mountain hare (Lepus timidus) at two areas on the southern edge of the species’ range. We monitored 34 hares between 2005 and 2008, estimating home range size, overlap, and site fidelity, and compared our results with space use in Scottish and North-European populations. Home ranges of mountain hares did not differ between two study areas with different habitat types. Subadult animals used larger ranges than adults and both age groups reduced home range size in autumn, a period that might be critical for hares due to changes in diet and/or high energy expenditure during the previous breeding season. Home ranges in these alpine populations were smaller than in Scandinavian populations but within the range of populations in different habitat types in Scotland. Seasonal home ranges overlapped considerably, but differed among the sexes: male–female overlap was higher than same sex (male–male and female–female) spatial overlap. Seasonal shifts of home ranges were small, and site fidelity remained high over the seasons, suggesting that resource distribution remained constant throughout the year and that the knowledge of an intensively frequented area is an important element of habitat quality. We concluded that habitat structure and availability of mates interact in affecting mountain hare space use in alpine habitats.

Keywords

Mountain hare Home range Site fidelity Overlap Distribution edge 

References

  1. Angerbjörn A, Flux JEC (1995) Lepus timidus. Mamm Species 495:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boutin S (1984) Effect of late winter food addition on numbers and movements of snowshoe hare. Oecologia 62:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conner M, Plowman B, Leopold BD, Lovell C (1999) Influence of time-in-residence on home range and habitat use of bobcats. J Wildl Manage 63:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Couturier M (1964) Le gibier des montagnes francaises. Arthaud, GrenobleGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahl F (2005a) Distinct seasonal habitat selection by annually sedentary mountain hares (Lepus timidus) in the boreal forest of Sweden. Eur J Wildl Res 51(3):163–169. doi:10.1007/s10344-005-0095-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahl F (2005b) Life and death of the mountain hare in the boreal forest of Sweden. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahl F, Willebrand T (2005) Natal dispersal, adult home ranges and site fidelity of mountain hares Lepus timidus in the boreal forest of Sweden. Wildl Biol 11:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eckert CG, Samis KE, Lougheed C (2008) Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol Ecol 17:1170–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03659.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ESRI Inc. (1999) Using ArcView GIS version 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Insitute, Inc., Redlands, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Flux JEC (1970a) Life history of the mountain hare (Lepus timidus scoticus) in north-east Scotland. J Zool (Lond) 161:75–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flux JEC (1970b) Colour change of mountain hares (Lepus timidus scoticus) in north-east Scotland. J Zool (Lond) 162:345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forys EA, Humprey SR (1996) Home range and movements of the lower marsh rabbit in a highly fragmented habitat. J Mammal 77(4):1042–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Genini-Gamboni AS, Bisi F, Masseroni E, Nodari M, Preatoni DG, Wauters LA, Martinoli A, Tosi G (2008) Home range dynamics of mountain hare (Lepus timidus) in the Swiss Alps. Hystrix It J Mammal 19(2):77–83Google Scholar
  14. Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8:461–467. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanski IK, Stevens PC, Ihalempia P, Selonen V (2000) Home range size, movements and nest-site use in the Siberian flying squirrel, Pteromys volans. J Mammal 81(3):798–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hewson R (1976) A population study of mountain hares (Lepus timidus) in North-East Scotland from 1956–1969. J Anim Ecol 45(2):395–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hewson R (1988) Spacing and habitat preference of mountain hares in Shetland. J Appl Ecol 25(2):397–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hewson R, Hinge MDC (1990) Characteristics of the home range of mountain hares Lepus timidus. J Appl Ecol 27(2):651–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hiltunen M (2006) The ecology of the mountain hare (Lepus timidus) in managed boreal forests: habitat associations at different forest scales. Dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  20. Hiltunen M, Kauhala K, Linden H (2004) Habitat use of the mountain hare Lepus timidus in summer: the importance of different vegetation layers. Acta Theriol 49(4):479–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holt R, Keitt T (2005) Species’ borders: a unifying theme in ecology. Oikos 108:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hulbert IAR, Iason GR, Elston DA, Racey PA (1996) Homerange sizes in a stratified upland landscape of two lagomorphs with different feeding strategies. J Appl Ecol 33(6):1479–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Isakovic I (1970) Game management in Yugoslavia. J Wildl Manage 34:800–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kauhala K, Hiltunen M, Salonen T (2005) Home ranges of mountain hares Lepus timidus in boreal forests of Finland. Wildl Biol 11(3):193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kenward RE, Clarke RT, Hodder KH, Walls SS (2001) Density and linkage estimators of home range: nearest-neighbour clustering defines multinuclear cores. Ecology 82:1905–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lurz PWW, Garson PJ, Wauters LA (2000) Effects of temporal and spatial variations in food supply on the space and habitat use of red squirrels, Sciurus vulgaris L. J Zool (Lond) 251:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marboutin E (1997) A note on home range size in the European hare (Lepus europaeus). Gibier Faune Sauvage 14(3):349–357Google Scholar
  29. Van der Merwe M, Racey PA (1991) Body composition and reproduction in mountain hares (Lepus timidus scoticus) in North-East Scotland. J Zool (Lond) 225:676–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W, Krystufek B, Reijnders PJH, Spitzenberger F, Stubbe M, Thissen JMB, Vohralik V, Zima J (1999) Atlas of European mammals. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Nams VO (2006) Locate III user’s guide. Pacer Computer Software, TatamagoucheGoogle Scholar
  32. Nodari M, Masseroni E, Preatoni DG, Wauters LA, Tosi G, Martinoli A (2005) Live-trapping success of the mountain hare (Lepus timidus) in the southern Italian Alps. Hystrix It J Mammal 16:143–148Google Scholar
  33. Ostfeld RS (1990) The ecology of territoriality in small mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 5:411–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pearson GA, Lago-Leston A, Mota C (2009) Frayed at the edges: selective pressure and adaptive response to abiotic stressors are mismatched in low diversity edge populations. J Ecol 97:450–462. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01481.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  36. Rao SJ, Iason GR, Hulbert IAR, Racey PA (2003) The effect of establishing native woodland on habitat selection and ranging of moorland hares (Lepus timidus), a flexible forager. J Zool (Lond) 260:1–9. doi:10.1017/S0952836903003534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rühe F, Hohmann U (2004) Seasonal locomotion and home-range characteristics of European hares (Lepus europaeus) in an arable region in central Germany. Eur J Wildl Res 50:101–111. doi:10.1007/s10344-004-0049-9 Google Scholar
  38. Sala OE, Chapin FSIII, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774. doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1770 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slotta-Bachmayr L, (1998) Biologie und Ökologie des Alpenschneehasen (Lepus timidus varronis Miller 1901). Verbreitung, Raumnutzung, Aktivität und Habitatwahl in den Hohen Tauern. Dissertation, Paris Lodron Universit, Salzburg, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  40. Stroh G (1931) Zwei sichere Altersmerkmale beim Hasen. Berl Tierärztl Wochenschr 12:180–181Google Scholar
  41. Swihart RK (1986) Home range—body mass allometry in rabbits and hares (Leporidae). Acta Theriol 31:139–148Google Scholar
  42. Thomas CD, Franco AM, Hill JK (2006) Range retractions and extinction in the face of climate warming. Trends Ecol Evol 21:415–416. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thulin C-G, Flux JEC (2003) Lepus timidus (Linnaeus 1758). Schneehase. In: Niethammer J, F Krapp (ed) Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas, Band 3/II, Lagomorpha. Aula Verlag, Wiebelsheim. pp 155–185.Google Scholar
  44. Wauters LA, Dhondt AA (1992) Spacing behaviour of the red squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris, variation between habitats and the sexes. Anim Behav 43:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wauters LA, Gurnell J, Preatoni D, Tosi G (2001) Effects of spatial variation in food availability on spacing behaviour and demography of Eurasian red squirrels. Ecography 24:525–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wauters LA, Bertolino S, Adamo M, van Dongen S, Tosi G (2005) Food shortage disrupts social organization: the case of red squirrels in conifer forests. Evol Ecol 19:375–404. doi:10.1007/s10682-005-8311-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wauters L, Preatoni DG, Molinari A, Tosi G (2007) Radio tracking squirrels: performance of home range density and linkage estimators with small range and sample size. Ecol Model 202:333–344. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolfe A, Hayden TJ (1996) Home range sizes of Irish mountain hares on coastal grassland. Biol Environ Proc Royal Ir Acad 96B(3):141–146Google Scholar
  50. Wooding JB, Hardisky TS (1994) Home range, habitat use and mortality of black bears in north-central Florida. Int Conf Bear Res Manage 9(1):349–356Google Scholar
  51. Worton B (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home range studies. Ecology 70:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Bisi
    • 1
  • Mosé Nodari
    • 1
  • Nuno Miguel Dos Santos Oliveira
    • 3
  • Elisa Masseroni
    • 2
  • Damiano G. Preatoni
    • 1
  • Lucas A. Wauters
    • 1
  • Guido Tosi
    • 1
  • Adriano Martinoli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department Environment-Health-SafetyUniversity of Insubria VareseVareseItaly
  2. 2.Oikos Institute Via Crescenzago 1MilanItaly
  3. 3.Animal Biology Department, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations