Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 193–202 | Cite as

Comparative evaluation of effort, capture and handling effects of drive nets to capture roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica)

  • Jorge R. López-Olvera
  • Ignasi Marco
  • Jordi Montané
  • Encarna Casas-Díaz
  • Gregorio Mentaberre
  • Santiago Lavín
Original Paper

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the usefulness of drive nets to capture roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica), comparing the results obtained with other capture methods and amongst the three species. Sixty-five drive net capture operations using beaters were conducted from January 1998 to September 2004. A total of 161 wild ungulates (31 roe deer, 95 Southern chamois and 35 Spanish ibexes) were captured. The average number of animals captured per operation was 1.07 for roe deer, 3.96 for Southern chamois and 2.92 for Spanish ibex. The average number of person–days per captured animal was 21.5, 7.1 and 10.6 for roe deer, Southern chamois and Spanish ibex, respectively. Specificity was 100% for Southern chamois and Spanish ibex (only the target species captured) and 77.5% for roe deer. Risk for the animals (mortality plus injuries) was 3.23% for roe deer, 5.27% for Southern chamois and 0% for Spanish ibex, whereas injuries to the operators occurred with 3.1% of the handled animals. Sex ratio was skewed towards females in roe deer, towards males in Southern chamois and balanced in Southern chamois. Drive nets showed good performance, although many operators were required. Safety for the animals and specificity were higher than traditionally attributed to this capture method. It is concluded that drive nets are an efficient and safe method to capture many ungulate species.

Keywords

Wild ungulates Mortality Lesions Performance Sex ratio 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to greatly thank the rangers and staff of the National Game Reserves of Alt Pallars-Aran, Cadí, Cerdanya-Alt Urgell, Freser-Setcases and Ports de Tortosa i Beseït for their invaluable collaboration in the capture of the animals, as well as the volunteers participating in the captures. We are also grateful to Professor P.G. Meneguz for support in literature search and to Professor Meneguz and Fabio for organizing the roe deer capture operations in Italy. This work is part of the research projects ‘Capture and handling stress in roe deer’ (AGF97-0493), ‘Assessment of capture and handling stress in Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica)’ (AGF99-0763-C02), and ‘Assessment of capture and post-capture handling stress in Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica)’ (REN 2001-1989/GLO), all of them financed by the Spanish ‘Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología’ (CICYT). One of the authors had a grant from the ‘Direcció General de Recerca’ (DGR) of the Catalan government, and another one had a FPI grant of the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. All the projects and procedures included in this study were approved by the Autonomous University of Barcelona’s Animal Welfare Committee and comply with national laws. The English of the manuscript has been read and corrected by a native English-speaking instructor of the Autonomous University of Barcelona.

References

  1. Abderhalden W, Buchli C, Ratti P, Godli D (1998) Einfang und Immobilisation von Alpensteinböcken (Capra i. ibex). Z Jagdwiss 44:123–132 doi: 10.1007/BF02250739 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appolinaire J, Muller P, Berducou C (1984) Capture et marquage d’isards. Doc Sci Parc Natl Pyrén 3:1–110Google Scholar
  3. Ballesteros F, Benito JL (1992) Captures d’isards Cantabriques en Asturies. Bull Mens ONC 171:25–29Google Scholar
  4. Beasom SL, Evans W, Temple L (1980) The drive net for capturing western big game. J Wildl Manage 44:478–480 doi: 10.2307/3807981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berducou C (1993) Chamois et isards: bilan des captures par filets, pièges et engins divers réalisées en France au cours des trente dernières années (1958–1989). In: Dubray D (ed) Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages. FDC de l’Hérault, Montpellier, France, pp 113–120Google Scholar
  6. Boutin JM, Angibault JM, van Laere G, Delorme D (1993) Bilan des expériences françaises en matière de capture du chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus). In: Dubray D (ed) Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages. FDC de l’Hérault, Montpellier, France, pp 73–76Google Scholar
  7. Casas-Díaz E (2007) Evaluación del estrés de captura mediante métodos físicos y químicos en la cabra montés (Capra pyrenaica) y su modulación con tranquilizantes. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain http://www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-0423108-164930/index.html
  8. Casas-Díaz E, López-Olvera JR, Mentaberre G, Marco I, Lavín S (2008) Hematological and serum biochemical values of Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica) captured by drive-net and box-trap. J Wildl Dis (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Catusse M, Appolinaire J, Menaut P (1994) Traumatismes dus à la capture et à la détention d’isards. BIPAS 9:109–115Google Scholar
  10. Chapman NG, Claydon K, Claydon M (1993) Sympatric populations of muntjac (Muntjiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a comparative analysis of their ranging behaviour, social organization and activity. J Zool (Lond) 229:623–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cugnasse JM, Oasquier JJ, Michallet J (1988) Le lacet a patte: une nouvelle technique de capture du Mouflon de Corse. Bull Mens ONC 129:31–35Google Scholar
  12. Delmas M (1993) Comparaison de deux méthodes de capture de chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) en milieu ouvert dans le Parc National de la Vanoise. In: Dubray D (ed) Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages. FDC de l’Hérault, Montpellier, France, pp 127–133Google Scholar
  13. Dematteis A, Rossi L, Canavese G, Menzano A, Meneguz PG (2008) Immobilising free-ranging Alpine chamois with xylazine, reversed with atipamezole. Vet Rec 163:184–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Escós J, Alados CL (1993) Immobilization of Spanish ibex with etorphine plus acepromazine. Mammalia 57(4):601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernández-Arias A, Aymerich M, Guiral J, Rodríguez C (1993) La capture des ongulés sauvages vivants, en Espagne. In: Dubray D (ed) Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages. FDC de l’Hérault, Montpellier, France, pp 135–138Google Scholar
  16. Fowler ME (2003) Sheep, goats and goatlike animals. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE (eds) Zoo and wild animal medicine, fifth edition. Saunders, Saint Louis, USA, pp 675–683Google Scholar
  17. Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B, Pradel R (1993) Roe deer survival patterns: a comparative analysis of contrasting populations. J Anim Ecol 62(4):778–791 doi: 10.2307/5396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. García-González R, Hidalgo R, Berducou R, Marquina R, Guardas (1993) Capture et marquage d’isards (Rupicapra r. pyrenaica) dans le Parc National d’Ordesa et Monte Perdido (Espagne). In: Dubray D (ed) Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages. FDC de l’Hérault, Montpellier, France, pp 304–306Google Scholar
  19. Gauthier D, Michallet J (1993) Bilan des expériences françaises en matière de capture par engins du Bouquetin des Alpes (Capra ibex ibex). In: Dubray D (ed) Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages. FDC de l’Hérault, Montpellier, France, pp 139–145Google Scholar
  20. Gibert P (1993) Conséquences de la capture et des manipulations sur la physiologie des ongulés sauvages. Incidence pathologique. Bilan des conaissances. In: Dubray D (ed) Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages. FDC de l’Hérault, Montpellier, France, pp 169–177Google Scholar
  21. Hansen E, Richard-Hansen C, Menaut P (1993) Mise au point d’une méthode de captures multiples d’isard (Rupicapra pyrenaica) par enclos piège. In: Dubray D (ed) Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages. FDC de l’Hérault, Montpellier, France, pp 121–126Google Scholar
  22. Jedrzejewski W, Kamler JF (2004) Modified drop-net for capturing ungulates. Wildl Soc Bull 32(4):1305–1308 doi: 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032[1305:FTFMDF]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jessup DA (1999) Capture and handling of mountain sheep and goats. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE (eds) Zoo and wild animal medicine, current therapy 4. Saunders, Philadelphia, USA, pp 681–687Google Scholar
  24. Jessup DA, Clark RK, Weaver RA, Kock MD (1988) The safety and cost-effectiveness of net-gun capture of desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni). J Zoo Anim Med 19:208–213Google Scholar
  25. Jones DM (1984) Physical and chemical methods of capturing deer. Vet Rec 114:109–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jullien JM, Pepin G, Marouze E (2001) La cham’arche, un filet pour la capture des ongulés de montagne. Faune sauvage 254:16–21Google Scholar
  27. Kamler JF, Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B (2008) Home ranger of red deer in a European old-growth forest. Am Midl Nat 159:75–82 doi: 10.1674/0003-0031(2008)159[75:HRORDI]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenny D, DeNicola A, Amgalanbaatar S, Namshir Z, Wingard G, Reading R (2008) Successful field capture techniques for free-ranging Argali sheep (Ovis ammon) in Mongolia. Zoo Biol 26:137–144 doi: 10.1002/zoo.20168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kock MD, Jessup DA, Clark RK, Franti CE (1987a) Effects of capture on biological parameters in free-ranging bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis): evaluation of drop-net, drive-net, chemical immobilization and the net gun. J Wildl Dis 23:641–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kock MD, Jessup DA, Clark RK, Franti CE, Weaver A (1987b) Capture methods of free-ranging bighorn sheep: an evaluation of drop-net, drive-net, chemical immobilization and the net gun. J Wildl Dis 23:634–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamberti P, Mauri L, Merli E, Dusi S, Apollonio M (2006) Use of space and habitat selection by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a Mediterranean coastal area: how does woods landscape affect home range? J Ethol 24(2):181–188 doi: 10.1007/s10164-005-0179-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Linnell JDC, Andersen R (1998) Territorial fidelity and tenure in roe deer bucks. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 43:67–75Google Scholar
  33. Locati M, Gentile L, Mari F (1991) La cattura di Camosci appenninici: considerazioni gestionali e recenti esperienze. In: Spagnesi M, Toso S (eds) Atti del II Convegno Nazionale dei Biologi della Selvaggina. Suppl Ric Biol Selvag XIX. Tipolitografia FG, Savignano sul Panaro, pp 195–202Google Scholar
  34. Loison A, Darmon G, Cassar S, Jullien JM, Maillard D (2008) Age- and sex-specific settlement patterns of chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) offspring. Can J Zool 86(6):588–593 doi: 10.1139/Z08-031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. López-Olvera JR, Marco I, Montané J, Lavín S (2006a) Haematological and serum biochemical values of Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) captured by drive-net. Vet Rec 158(14):479–484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. López-Olvera JR, Marco I, Montané J, Lavín S (2006b) Transport stress in Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and its modulation by acepromazine. Vet J 172(2):347–355 doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.06.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. López-Olvera JR, Marco I, Montané J, Casas-Díaz E, Lavín S (2007) Effects of acepromazine on stress response in Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) captured by means of drive-nets. Can J Vet Res 71(1):41–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Marco I (1995) Modificaciones de las constantes clínicas sanguíneas debidas al estrés de manejo en el muflón (Ovis ammon). Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  39. Marco I, Lavín S (1999) Effect of the method of capture on the haematology and blood chemistry of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Res Vet Sci 66:81–84 doi: 10.1053/rvsc.1998.0248 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mattfeld GF, Wiley JE, Behrend DF (1972) Salt versus browse-seasonal baits for deer trapping. J Wildl Manage 36:996–996 doi: 10.2307/3799469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Menaut P (1994) Capture of izards, in spring and in autumn, with leg snare in the national reserve of Orlu (Pyrenees, France). Bull Mens ONC 194:2–8Google Scholar
  42. Menaut P, Loison A (1994) Capture of izards with propulsed nets. Bull Mens ONC 195:9–13Google Scholar
  43. Meneguz PG, Rossi L, de Meneghi D (1994) Esperienze di cattura de caprioli (Capreolus capreolus) e di camosci (Rupicapra rupicapra) con reti verticali. BIPAS 11:107–114Google Scholar
  44. Meneguz PG, Marco-Sánchez I, Rossi L, de Meneghi D, Isaia MC (1996) Misurazione dello stress negli ungulati selvatici. Esperienze su caprioli (Capreolus capreolus) catturati con rete verticali. Suppl Ric Biol Selvag 24:447–456Google Scholar
  45. Meneguz PG, Rossi L, De Meneghi D, Righero G, Pulzoni E (1997) Esperienze di cattura di capriole Capreolus capreolus e di camosci Rupicapra rupicapra con reti verticali. Note preliminare. Suppl Ric Biol Selvag XXVII:633–638Google Scholar
  46. Montané J (2002) Valoración del estrés de captura, manejo y transporte del corzo (Capreolus capreolus). Efecto de la acepromacina y de la cautividad. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain http://www.tdx.cbuc.es/TDX-0303103-204019/index.html#documents
  47. Montané J, Marco I, López-Olvera JR, Manteca X, Lavín S (2001) Multiple bilateral fractures of the lumbar transverse processes in a roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). J Zoo Wildl Med 32(3):387–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Montané J, Marco I, López-Olvera J, Manteca X, Lavín S (2002) Transport stress in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): effect of a short-acting antipsychotic. Anim Welf 11(4):405–417Google Scholar
  49. Montané J, Marco I, López J, Manteca X, Lavín S (2003) Effects of acepromazine on capture stress in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). J Wildl Dis 39(2):375–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nielsen L (ed) (1999) Chemical immobilization of wild and exotic animals. Iowa State University Press, Ames, USAGoogle Scholar
  51. Peinado VI, Fernández-Arias A, Viscor G, Palomeque J (1993) Haematology of Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica hispanica) restrained by physical or chemical means. Vet Rec 132:580–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Peracino V, Bassano B (1988) Metodologie di cattura di ungulati nel Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso. Prax Vet 11:25–26Google Scholar
  53. Peracino V, Bassano B (1993) Bilan de 30 annees d’experience de capture des ongules sauvages—Bouquetin des Alpes (Capra ibex ibex) et chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra rupicapra)—dans le Parc National du Grand Paradis (Italie). In: Dubray D (ed) Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages. FDC de l’Hérault, Montpellier, France, pp 37–44Google Scholar
  54. Pérez JM, Granados JE, Ruiz-Martínez I, Chirosa M (1997) Capturing Spanish ibexes with corral traps. Wildl Soc Bull 25:89–92Google Scholar
  55. Pérez JM, Granados JE, González FJ, Ruiz-Martínez I, Soriguer RC (1999) Hematologic parameters of the Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica). J Zoo Wildl Med 30:550–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Pérez JM, González FJ, Granados JE, Pérez MC, Fandós P, Soriguer RC, Serrano E (2003) Hematologic and biochemical reference intervals for Spanish ibex. J Wildl Dis 39:209–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pérez-Barbería FJ (1994) Biología, ecología y caracterización genética del rebeco cantábrico (Rupicapra pyrenaica parva). Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Oviedo, SpainGoogle Scholar
  58. Peterson MN, López RR, Frank PA, Peterson MJ, Silvy NJ (2003) Evaluating capture methods for urban white-tailed deer. Wildl Soc Bull 31:1176–1187Google Scholar
  59. Powell RA, Proulx G (2003) Trapping and marking terrestrial mammals for research: integrating ethics, performance criteria, techniques, and common sense. ILAR J 44:259–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Schemnitz SD (1994) Capturing and handling wild animals. In: Bookhout TA (ed) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. 5th edn. Wildlife Society, Bethesda, USA, pp 106–124Google Scholar
  61. Seddon PJ, VanHeezik Y, Maloney RF (1999) Short- and medium-term evaluation of foothold trap injuries in two species of fox in Saudi Arabia. In: Proulx G (ed) Mammal trapping. Alpha Wildlife Research and Management, Sherwood Park, Canada, pp 67–78Google Scholar
  62. Spraker TR (1982) An overview of the pathophysiology of capture myopathy and related conditions that occur at the time of capture of wild animals. In: Nielsen L, Haigh JC, Fowler ME (eds) Chemical immobilization of North American wildlife. Wisconsin Humane Society, Milwaukee, USA, pp 83–118Google Scholar
  63. Spraker TR (1993) Stress and capture myopathy in artiodactyls. In: Fowler ME (ed) Zoo and wild animal medicine. Current Therapy 3. Saunders, Philadelphia, USA, pp 481–488Google Scholar
  64. Struch M, Baumann M (2000) Experiences of catching chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) in a wooded mountain area in Switzerland. Oecol Mont 9:48–49Google Scholar
  65. Sullivan JB, de Young CA, Beason SL, Heffelfinger JR, Coughlin SP, Hellickson MW (1991) Drive-netting deer: incidence of mortality. Wildl Soc Bull 19:393–396Google Scholar
  66. Toigo C, Gaillard JM, Michallet J (1996) La taille des groupes: un bioindicateur de l’effectif des populations de bouquetin des Alpes (Capra ibex ibex)? Mammalia 60:463–472Google Scholar
  67. Van Laere J, Boutin JM (1990) Capture de chevreuils (Capreolus capreolus) aux filets. Bull Mens ONC 143:29–33Google Scholar
  68. Willisch CS, Ingold P (1996) Feeding or resting? The strategy of rutting male Alpine chamois. Ethology 113:97–104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge R. López-Olvera
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ignasi Marco
    • 1
  • Jordi Montané
    • 1
  • Encarna Casas-Díaz
    • 1
  • Gregorio Mentaberre
    • 1
  • Santiago Lavín
    • 1
  1. 1.Servei d’Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge, Facultat de Veterinària (Edifici V)Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (CSIC/UCLM)Ciudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations