Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 723–728 | Cite as

Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a giant panda reserve

  • Jing Cai
  • Zhigang Jiang
  • Yan Zeng
  • Chunwang Li
  • Benjamin D. Bravery
Original Paper

Abstract

In China, following the introduction of protection measures, wild boar (Sus scrofa) are returning to forested mountains they previously inhabited and conflict in villages near or within areas under protection has intensified. We studied this phenomenon around a giant panda nature reserve in the Qinling Mountains, China to determine the incidence and frequency of wild boar damage and methods of mitigation. Over a 3-year period, we found that almost half of households in the local village sustained crop damage, that wild boar frequently raided maize (Zea mays), potato (Ipomoea batatas), and wheat (Triticum aestivum) adjoining the reserve, and that boar usually raided croplands at night and preferred the actual crops. The distance between maize fields and mountains or a stream predicted the probability of a field being raided and also the severity of the damage. Local farmers used many methods to protect their crops; however, all were ineffective except increasing the presence of humans in fields.

Keywords

Animal–human conflict Maize Watching hut Ecotourism Qinling Mountains 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Chinese Academy of Sciences Innovative Research International Partnership Project (CXTDS2005-4), Columbus Zoo and Aquarium, and UAS field conservation funds for financial support. Thank you to staff of Laoxiancheng Nature Reserve for their assistance and to Jing yu, Xueli Lu, and Yankuo Li for their help in the survey. Finally, we thank everyone living in the Laoxiancheng village that participated in the study.

References

  1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker SE, Ellwood SA, Watkins RW, Madonald DW (2005) Non-lethal control of wildlife: using chemical repellents as feeding deterrents for the European badger Meles meles. J Appl Ecol 42:921–931, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01069.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balmford A, Moore JL, Streams T, Burgess N, Hansen LA, Williams P et al (2001) Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291:2616–2619, doi: 10.1126/science.291.5513.2616 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berrutti MA, Frade J, Amorin O (1998) Wild Boar status in Uruguay. Third workshop of the European wild boar research group. Insituto Pirenaico de Ecología (CSIC), ZaragozaGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg WR, Gall MD (1989) Educational research. Longman, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Bullock J (1996) Plants. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census technique: a hand book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 111–138Google Scholar
  7. Cai J, Jiang Z (2006) Human–large mammals conflicts: a new challenge of wildlife conservation. Acta Theriol Sin 26:183–190Google Scholar
  8. Calenge C, Maillard D, Fournier P, Fouque C (2004) Efficiency of spreading maize in the garigues to reduce wild boar (Sus scrofa) damage to Mediterranean vineyards. Eur J Wildl Res 50:112–120Google Scholar
  9. Choquenot D, McIlroy J, Korn T (1996) Managing vertebrate pests: feral pigs. Bureau of Resource Sciences, Australian Government, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  10. Conover MR, Decker DJ (1991) Wildlife damage to crops: perceptions of agricultural and wildlife professionals in 1957 and 1987. Wildl Soc Bull 19:46–52Google Scholar
  11. Fall MW, Jackson WB (1998) A new era of vertebrate pest control? An introduction special issue. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 42:85–91, doi: 10.1016/S0964-8305(98)00058-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernández-Llario P, Mateos-Quesada P, Silvério CA, Évora PS (2003) Habitat effects and shooting techniques on two wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations in Spain and Portugal. Z Jagdwiss 49:120–129, doi: 10.1007/BF02190452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fournier CC, Maillard D, Foumi P (1996) Variability of the diet of wild boars (Sus Scrofa) in the Montpellier garrigue arrigue (Herault). Gibier Faune Sauvage 13:1457–1476Google Scholar
  14. Fruziński B, Poznań LŁ (2002) Management of wild boar in Poland. Z Jagdwiss 48(Supplement):201–207 doi: 10.1007/BF02192409 Google Scholar
  15. Fwenández-llario P, Maeos-quesada P (1998) Body size and reproductive parameters in the wild boar. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 43:439–444Google Scholar
  16. Geisser H (1998) The wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Thurgau (Northeastern Switzerland): population status, damage and the influence of supplementary feeding on damage frequency. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15:547–554Google Scholar
  17. Geisser H (2000) Das Wildschwein (Sus scrofa) im Kanton Thurgau (Schweiz): Analyse der Populationsdynamik, der Habitatansprüche und der Feldschäden in einem anthropogen beeinflussten Lebensraum. Thesis, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Geisser H, Reyer H (2004) Efficiency of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crops damage by wild boars. J Wildl Manage 68:939–946, doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0939:EOHFAF]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Genov PV, Tonini L, Massei G (1995) Crops damage by wild ungulates in a Mediterranean area. In: Botev N (ed) The game and the man. Proc IUGB, Sofia, pp 214–215Google Scholar
  20. Herrero J, García-Serrano A, Couto S, Ortuño VM, García-González R (2006) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. Eur J Wildl Res 52:245–250, doi: 10.1007/s10344-006-0045-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoare R (2000) African elephants and humans in conflict: the outlook for co-existence. Oryx 34:34–38, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3008.2000.00092.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hone J (2002) Feral pigs in Namadgi National Park, Australia: dynamics, impacts and management. Biol Conserv 105:231–242, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00185-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiang Z (2004) Behavioral interaction between wild animals and human beings. In: Jiang Z (ed) Animal behavior principles and species conservation methods. Science, Beijing, China, pp 327–339Google Scholar
  24. Jiang Z (2005) On the upper limit of the protected areas in China. Acta Ecol Sin 25:14–21Google Scholar
  25. Jiang Z (2006) Biodiversity in the Shaanxi Laoxiancheng Nature Reserve. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  26. Kristiansson H (1985) Crop damage by wild boars in Central Sweden. Proceedings of the XVIIth Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists, Brussels, Belgium, pp 605–609Google Scholar
  27. Linkie M, Dinata Y, Nofrianto A, Leader-Williams N (2007) Patterns and perceptions of wildlife crop raiding in and around Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra. Anim Conserv 10:127–135, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00083.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mackin R (1970) Dynamics of damage caused by wild boar to different agricultural crops. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 15:447–458Google Scholar
  29. Messmer TA (2000) The emergence of human–wildlife conflict management: turning challenges into opportunities. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 45:97–102, doi: 10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00045-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Messmer TA, George S, Copsicelli L (1997) Legal considerations regarding lethal and nonlethal approaches to managing urban deer. Wildl Soc Bull 25:424–429Google Scholar
  31. Muthmainnah RH, Supardi (1998) Integrated wild pig (Sus scrofa) control in Camming sugar manufacture. Ber Pus Penelit Perkeb Gula Indones 23:20–22Google Scholar
  32. Naughton-Treves L (1998) Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conserv Biol 12:156–158, doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96346.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Naughton-Treves L, Mena JL, Treves A, Alvares N, Radeloff VC (2003) Wildlife survival beyond park boundaries: the impact of slash-and-burn agriculture and hunting on mammals in Tambopata, Perú. Conserv Biol 17:1106–1117, doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02045.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nyhus P, Tilson R (2004) Agroforestry, elephants, and tigers: balancing conservation theory and practice in human-dominated landscapes of Southeast Asia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:87–97, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pérez E, Luis FP (2006) Damage by large mammals to subsistence crops within a protected area in a montane forest of Bolivia. Crop Prot 25:933–939, doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richard H, Lamprey RH, Reid RS (2004) Expansion of human settlement in Kenya’s Maasai Mara: what future for pastoralism and wildlife? J Biogeogr 31:997–1032, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01062.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saj TL, Pascale SS, Paterson JD (2001) The conflict between vervet monkeys and farmers at the forest edge in Entebbe, Uganda. African wildlife society. J Afr Ecol 39:195–199, doi: 10.1046/j.0141-6707.2000.00299.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schley L (2000) The badger Meles meles and the wild boar (Sus scrofa): distribution and damage to agricultural crops in Luxembourg. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, UKGoogle Scholar
  39. Schley L, Roper TJ (2003) Diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mamm Rev 33:43–56, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00010.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schley L, Roper TJ (2004) Distribution and population density of badgers Meles meles in Luxembourg. Mamm Rev 34:233–240, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2004.00040.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Siex KS, Struhsaker TT (1999) Colobus monkeys and coconuts: a study of perceived human–wildlife conflicts. J Appl Ecol 36:1009–1020, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00455.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spitz F, Lek S (1999) Environmental impact prediction using neural network modeling: an example in wildlife damage. J Appl Ecol 36:317–326, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00400.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sukumar R (1991) The management of large mammals in relation to male strategies and conflict with people. Biol Conserv 55:93–102, doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(91)90007-V CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sun C, Zhang Z, Jin X (2005) The division of sub-population of giant panda in Qinling and its quantitative distribution. Chin Wildl 26:51–54Google Scholar
  45. Treves A, Karanth KU (2003) Human–carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore managements worldwide. Conserv Biol 17:1491–1499, doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vassant J (1996) Evolution of wild boar populations and damage to crops in France between 1978 and 1993. In CIC, Proceeding of Schwarzwild Symposium, Sopron, Ungarn, pp 131–141Google Scholar
  47. Vijayan S, Pati BP (2002) Impact of changing cropping patterns on man–animal conflicts around Gir Protected Area with specific reference to Talala Sub-District, Gujarat, India. Popul Environ 23:541–559, doi: 10.1023/A:1016317819552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu S, Chen H (2000) Preliminary study on the population structures and reproductive habit in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Dawuling nature reserve. Acta Theriol Sin 20:151–156Google Scholar
  49. Zhang L, Wang N (2003) An initial study on habitat conservation of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), with a focus on human elephant conflict in Simao, China. Biol Conserv 112:453–459, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00335-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing Cai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhigang Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yan Zeng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chunwang Li
    • 1
  • Benjamin D. Bravery
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of ZoologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Hainan Datian National Nature ReserveDongfangChina

Personalised recommendations