European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 36–43 | Cite as

Fate of recombinant DNA and Cry1Ab protein after ingestion and dispersal of genetically modified maize in comparison to rapeseed by fallow deer (Dama dama)

  • P. Guertler
  • B. Lutz
  • R. Kuehn
  • H. H. D. Meyer
  • R. Einspanier
  • B. Killermann
  • C. Albrecht
Original Paper

Abstract

The fate of recombinant DNA in fallow deer (Dama dama) was investigated by feeding a diet of isogenic or genetically modified (GM) maize expressing Cry1Ab protein against the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis). To study the degradability of ingested DNA, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were introduced to detect fragments of the endogenous, highly abundant chloroplast-specific rubisco gene, the maize-specific zein gene and the recombinant cry1Ab gene. PCR analysis revealed that small chloroplast- and maize-specific DNA fragments were detectable in contents of rumen, abomasums, jejunum, caecum and colon and occasionally in visceral tissues. In contrast, no fragments of the recombinant cry1Ab gene were detectable in gastrointestinal (GI) contents. The Cry1Ab protein was analysed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting technique. Neither ELISA nor immunoblotting yielded positive signals of immunoactive Cry1Ab protein in GI contents and tissues of fallow deer fed with GM maize. In conclusion, after uptake of GM maize, neither cry1Ab-specific gene fragments nor Cry1Ab protein were detected in the GI tract of fallow deer, indicating complete digestion of the GM maize. Additional investigations on the germination capacity of conventional rapeseed and maize seed after ingestion by fallow deer and faecal excretion (endozoochory) were performed to draw conclusions regarding a potential spreading of germinable GM crop seed by deer. Germination tests revealed that germinable rapeseed kernels were detectable in faeces; in contrast, no intact maize seeds were found in faeces.

Keywords

Genetically modified plants Bt-maize MON810 Bt176 Wildlife 

References

  1. Champolivier J, Gasquez J, Messéan A (1999) Crop management of transgenic rapeseed: risk assessment of gene flow. In: New horizons for an old crop. Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapman N (1993) Distribution and biology of fallow deer. In: Asher GW (ed) Proceedings of the first world forum on fallow deer farming, Mudgee, NSW, Australia, 10–13 March 1993, p 1Google Scholar
  3. Chapman D, Chapman N (1975) Fallow deer: their history, distribution and biology. Terence Dalton, Lavenham, Suffolk, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Chowdhury EH, Kuribara H, Hino A, Sutana P, Mikami O, Shimada N, Guruge KS, Saito M Nakajima Y (2003a) Detection of corn intrinsic and recombinant DNA fragments and Cry1Ab protein in the GI contents of pigs fed genetically modified corn Bt11. J Anim Sci 81:2546–2551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chowdhury EH, Shimada N, Murata H, Mikami O, Sultana P, Miyazaki S, Yoshioka M, Yamanaka N, Hirai N, Nakajima Y (2003b) Detection of Cry1Ab protein in GI contents but not visceral organs of genetically modified Bt11-fed calves. Vet Hum Toxicol 45:71–75Google Scholar
  6. Chowdhury EH, Mikami O, Murata H, Sultana P, Shimada N, Yoshioka M, Guruge KS, Yamamoto S. Miyazaki S, Yamanaka N, Nakajima Y (2004) Fate of maize intrinsic and recombinant genes in calves fed genetically modified maize Bt11. J Food Prot 67:365–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Einspanier R, Klotz A, Kraft J, Aulrich K, Poser R, Schwägele F, Jahreis G, Flachowsky G (2001) The fate of forage DNA in farm animals: a collaborative case study investigating cattle and chicken fed recombinant plant material. Eur Food Res Technol 212:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Einspanier R, Lutz B, Rief S, Berezina O, Zverlov V, Schwarz W, Mayer J (2004) Tracing residual recombinant feed molecules during digestion and rumen bacterial diversity in cattle fed transgenic maize. Eur Food Res Technol 218:269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flachowsky G, Chesson A, Aulrich K (2005) Animal nutrition with feeds from genetically modified plants. Arch Anim Nutr 59:1–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinken T, Raudnitschka D (2002) Do wild ungulates contribute to the dispersal of vascular plants in central European forests by epizoochory? A case study in NE Germany. Forstwiss Cent bl 121:179–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heinken T, Lees R, Raudnitschka D, Runge S (2001) Epizoochorous dispersal of bryophyte stem fragments by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa). J Bryol 23:293–300Google Scholar
  12. Heinken T, Oheimb G v, Schmidt M, Kriebitzsch W-U, Ellenberg H (2005) Schalenwild breitet Gefäßpflanzen in der mitteleuropäischen Kulturlandschaft aus-ein erster Überblick. Nat Landsch 4:141–147Google Scholar
  13. Höfte H, Whitely HR (1989) Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev 53:242–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. International Seed Testing Association (2004) International Rules for Seed Testing. ISTA, Switzerland (ISBN 3-906549-38-0)Google Scholar
  15. James C (2004) Preview: global status of commercialised biotech/GM crops. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY (ISAAA Briefs 32)Google Scholar
  16. Jennings JC, Albee LD, Kolwyck DC, Suber JB, Taylor ML, Hartnell GF, Lirette RP, Glenn KC (2003) Attempts to detect transgenic and endogenous plant DNA and transgenic protein in muscle from broilers fed YieldGard Corn borer corn. Poult Sci 82:371–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lutz B, Wiedemann S, Einspanier R, Mayer J, Albrecht C (2005) Degradation of Cry1Ab protein from genetically modified maize in the bovine gastrointestinal tract. J Agric Food Chem 53:1454–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayle B (1999) Domestic stock grazing to enhance woodland biodiversity. Forestry Commission Information Note 28. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  19. Pekrun C, Lutman PJW, Baeumer K (1998) Research on volunteer rape. A review. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 2:84–90Google Scholar
  20. Phipps RH, Deaville ER, Maddison BC (2003) Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA in rumen fluid, duodenal digesta, milk, blood and faeces of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 86:4070–4078PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Steward NC Jr, Halfhill MD, Warwick S (2002) Gene flow and its consequences: Brassica napus (canola, oilseed rape) to wild relatives. In: Gene flow workshop, The Ontario State University, March 2002, pp 106–112Google Scholar
  22. Wiedemann S, Lutz B, Kurtz H, Schwarz FJ, Albrecht C (2006) In situ studies on the time-dependent degradation of recombinant corn DNA and protein in the bovine rumen. J Anim Sci 84:135–144PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Guertler
    • 1
  • B. Lutz
    • 1
  • R. Kuehn
    • 2
  • H. H. D. Meyer
    • 1
  • R. Einspanier
    • 3
  • B. Killermann
    • 4
  • C. Albrecht
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Physiology WeihenstephanTechnical University MunichFreisingGermany
  2. 2.Wildlife Biology and Wildlife Management UnitTechnical University MunichFreisingGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Veterinary BiochemistryFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Institute for Crop Science and Plant BreedingBavarian State Research Center for AgricultureFreisingGermany
  5. 5.Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular MedicineUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations