Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 183–189 | Cite as

Selection of resting sites by the European hare as related to habitat characteristics during agricultural changes

  • Dominique Pépin
  • Jean Marc Angibault
Original Paper

Abstract

The decline of the European hare Lepus europaeus populations has been shown to be correlated with agricultural intensification, which has caused loss of habitat heterogeneity. We aimed to investigate the diurnal spring habitat selection using Jacobs’ second selection index in an intensively cultivated farmland to reveal how the habitat choice by resting hares was affected by changes in the habitat availability. Clearance counts of hares driven out of known areas were made during an 11-year field investigation within two sectors of a private hunting ground located in the Paris basin (France). The loss of habitat heterogeneity included the disappearance of pastures dedicated to a last remaining sheep farm in the area, the removal of non-cropped areas and field boundaries and the increase of mean field size. Breeding stocks of hare declined during the study. Harrowed fields were always avoided. Pastures, alfalfa fields, thickets and fallow land were selected at the start of our study, whereas the remaining part was avoided at the end. The preference for ploughed fields decreased with the growth of vegetation in the winter-wheat fields. To benefit hares, land management should provide year-round vegetative cover and food from non-cropped areas in intensive arable farms.

Keywords

Arable farmland Field margin Habitat heterogeneity Habitat selection Lepus europaeus Population decline 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Partial financial support for this study was provided by the National Game and Wildlife Agency (Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage). We are grateful to Mr. de Boisgelin for permitting us to work on his farm. We are very grateful to the volunteers who helped us to carry out the spring censuses, and especially to Marcel Birkan. Assistance for the ANCOVA was kindly provided by Nicolas Morellet. Two anonymous referees provided very helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.

References

  1. Angelici FM, Riga F, Boitani L, Luiselli L (1999) Use of dens by radio-tracked brown hares Lepus europeaus. Behav Processes 47:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baudry J, Bunce RGH, Burel F (2000) Hedgerow: an international perspective on their origin, function and management. J Environ Manag 60:7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Critchley CNR, Allen DS, Fowbert JA, Mole AC, Gundrey AL (2004) Habitat establishment on arable land: assessment of an agri-environment scheme in England, UK. Biol Conserv 119:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Vos A, Dean PB (1967) The distribution of and the use of forms by European hares, Lepus europaeus hybridus (Desmaret, 1882), in southern Ontario. Säugetierkdl Mitt 15:57–61Google Scholar
  6. Edwards PJ, Fletcher MR, Berny P (2000) Review of the factors affecting the decline of the European brown hare, Lepus europaeus (Pallas, 1778) and the use of wildlife incident data to evaluate the significance of paraquat. Agr Ecosyst Environ 79:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris S, Morris P, Wray S, Yalden D (1995) A review of British mammals: population estimates and conservation status of British mammals other than cetaceans. JNCC Rep, Peterborough. http://www.jncc.gov.uk/pdf/pub03_areviewofbritishmammalsall.pdf Google Scholar
  8. Hutchings MR, Harris S (1996) The current status of the brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Britain. JNCC Rep, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs J (1974) Quantitative measurements of food selection. A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev’s electivity index. Oecologia 14:413–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jennings NV, Smith RK, Hackländer K, Harris S, White PCL (2006) Variation in demography, condition and dietary quality of hares Lepus europeaus from high-density and low-density populations. Wildlife Biol 12:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jezierski W (1973) Environmental conditioning of the space structure and shyness in hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778). Ekol Pol 21:1–12Google Scholar
  12. Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Panek M, Kamieniarz R (1999) Relationships between density of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) and landscape structure in Poland in the years 1981–95. Acta Theriol 44:67–75Google Scholar
  14. Pépin D (1986) Spring density and daytime distribution of the European hare in relation to habitat in an open field agrosystem. Z Saügetierkd 51:79–86Google Scholar
  15. Pielowski Z (1966) Forschungen über den Feldhasen. XII. Die Raumstruktur der Population. Acta Theriol 11:449–484Google Scholar
  16. Pielowski Z, Raczynski J (1976) Ecological conditions and rational management of hare populations. In: Pielowski Z, Pucek Z (eds), Ecology and management of European hare populations, Polish Hunting Association, Warsaw, pp 269–286Google Scholar
  17. Reichlin T, Klansek E, Hackländer K (2006) Diet selection by hares (Lepus europaeus) in arable land and its implication for habitat management. Eur J Wildl Res 52:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schmidt NM, Asferg T, Forchhammer MC (2004) Long-term patterns in European brown hare population dynamics in Denmark: effects of agriculture, predation and climate. BMC Ecology 4:15. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/4/15 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Slamečka J (1991) The influence of ecological arrangements on brown hare population. In: Csányi S, Ernhaft J (eds) Proceedings of XXth Congress International Union of Game Biologists, Univ Agricultural Sciences, Gödöllö, Hungary, pp 340–346Google Scholar
  20. Smith RK, Jennings NV, Robinson A, Harris S (2004) Conservation of European hares Lepus europaeus in Britain: is increasing habitat heterogeneity in farmland the answer? J Appl Ecol 41:1092–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith RK, Jennings NV, Harris S (2005a) A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mamm Rev 35:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith RK, Jennings NV, Tataruch F, Hackländer K, Harris S (2005b) Vegetation quality and habitat selection by European hares Lepus europaeus in pastural landscape. Acta Theriol 50:391–404Google Scholar
  23. Sotherton NW (1998) Land use changes and the decline of farmland wildlife: an appraisal of the set-aside approach. Biol Conserv 83:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tapper SC, Barnes RFW (1986) Influence of farming practice on the ecology of the brown hare (Lepus europeaus). J Appl Ecol 23:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Comportement et Ecologie de la Faune SauvageInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)Castanet-Tolosan cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations