European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 271–276 | Cite as

Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: uptake studies of new baits and investigations on the stability of lyophilised C-strain vaccine

  • A. Brauer
  • E. Lange
  • V. KadenEmail author
Original Paper


The aim of this study was to investigate the uptake of new spherical and cuboid baits by wild boar and domestic pigs and to evaluate the stability of lyophilised C-strain vaccine stored at different environmental temperatures. New baits were designed to improve the consumption of the vaccine against classical swine fever by young wild boar. Our uptake studies showed that neither wild boar nor domestic pigs at the age of 2 months picked up the baits at all. Although the animals began to pick up the baits incompletely at the age of 3 months, a complete uptake of both the new baits and the older ones was only observed from the age of 4 (domestic pigs) and 4.5 (wild boar) months on. Nevertheless, the larger spherical baits with a diameter of 3 cm were taken up more effectively than the recent vaccine baits. As expected, lyophilised vaccine showed a higher stability than liquid vaccine, especially at temperatures ≥24°C. Independently of the stabiliser (GS4 or TSM) used, there are no differences between the virus titres detected within a storage period of 7 days. As the lyophilised C-strain vaccine was more stable at higher temperatures than the liquid vaccine formulation, we recommend to use lyophilised vaccine for oral immunisation of wild boar in the future, as oral vaccination is also carried out in the summertime.


Classical swine fever Wild boar Oral immunisation New baits Bait uptake Stability of vaccine 



We thank Malte Adelmann for his assistance in the preparation of the vaccine formulation; Dr. B. Lange, RIEMSER Arzneimittel AG, for kindly providing vaccine virus and vaccine stabilisers; and Jana Vesely for orienting us with the statistical analysis. We are also grateful to Anette Beidler for helpful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript. This study was supported by the EC project ‘CSF Vaccine & Wild Boar’ (contract number SSP 1-501599).


  1. Hohne J, Stone CP (1989) A comparison and evaluation of feral pig management in two national parks. Wildl Soc Bull 17:419–425Google Scholar
  2. Kaden V (1999) Bekämpfung der Klassischen Schweinepest beim Schwarzwild. Z Jagdwiss 45:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaden V, Lange E (1998) Vaccination as strategy of CSF control in wild boar. In: Measures to control classical swine fever in European wild boar. Perugia, Italy, 6–7 April 1998, European Commission, Doc. VI/196/98 AL, pp 110–114Google Scholar
  4. Kaden V, Lange B (2001) Oral immunisation against classical swine fever (CSF): onset and duration of immunity. Vet Microbiol 82:301–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaden V, Lange E (2004) Development of maternal antibodies after oral vaccination of young female wild boar against classical swine fever. Vet Microbiol 103:115–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaden V, Lange E, Steyer H (1999) Orale Immunisierung gegen Klassische Schweinepest beim Schwarzwild: Bewertung maternaler Antikörper. Amtstierärztl Dienst u Lebensmittelkontrolle 6:302–305Google Scholar
  7. Kaden V, Lange E, Fischer U, Strebelow G (2000) Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany. Vet Microbiol 73:239–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaden V, Heyne H, Kiupel H, Letz W, Kern B, Lemmer U, Gossger K, Rothe A, Böhme H, Tyrpe P (2002) Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: concluding analysis of the recent field trials in Germany. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr 115:179–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaden V, Renner Ch, Rothe A, Lange E, Hänel A, Gossger K (2003a) Evaluation of the oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever in Baden-Württenberg. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr 116:362–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaden V, Irsch B, Schwickert St, Blicke J, Straubinger B (2003b) State of the art of oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever in Rhineland-Palatinate. Report on Annual Meeting of National Classical Swine Fever Laboratories, Brussels, Belgium, 12–13 May, European Commission, Doc. SANCO/10457/2003, pp 32–39Google Scholar
  11. Kaden V, Hänel A, Renner Ch, Gossger K (2005a) Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever in Baden-Württenberg: development of the seroprevalence based on the hunting bag. Eur J Wildl Res 51:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaden V, Kramer M, Kern B, Hlinak A, Teuffert J, Staubach C, Mewes L, Hänel A, Renner Ch, Dedek J, Kiupel H, Bruer W, Blicke J (2005b) Orale immunisierung gegen klassische Schweinepest beim Schwarzwild: Empfehlungen zur Diagnose nach Einstellung der Impfung. Amtstierärztl Dienst u Lebensmittelkontrolle 12:266–271Google Scholar
  13. Kern B, Lahrmann KH (2000) Orale Immunisierung gegen klassische Schweinepest (KSP) beim Schwarzwild in Brandenburg 1995 bis 1997. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr 107:469–544Google Scholar
  14. Loepelmann H (1994) Impfstoffe. In: Dedek J, Steineck Th (eds) Wildhygiene. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, pp 277–285Google Scholar
  15. Loepelmann H, Dedek J (1991) Orientierende Untersuchungen zur oralen Immunisierung freilebenden Schwarzwildes. Tierärztl Umsch 46:775–778Google Scholar
  16. McIlroy JC, Braysher M, Saunders GR (1989) Effectiveness of a warfarin-poisoning campaign against feral pigs, Sus scrofa, in Namadgi National Park, A.C.T. Aust Wildl Res 16:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meynhardt H (1984) Schwarzwild report. Neumann Verlag, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  18. Saunders G, Kay B, Parker B (1990) Evaluation of a warfarin poisoning programme for feral pigs (Sus scrofa). Aust Wildl Res 17:525–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schuster P (1996) Untersuchungen zur Köderung des Schwarzwildes als Grundlage zur Applikation von Arzneimitteln und Impfstoffen. Thesis, University LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  20. van Regenmortel MHV, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL, Carstens EB, Estes MK, Lemon SM, Maniloff J, Mayo MA, McGeoch DJ, Pringle CR, Wickner RB (2000) Virus taxonomy, VIIth Report of the ICTV. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Infectology, Friedrich-Loeffler-InstitutFederal Research Institute for Animal HealthGreifswald-Insel RiemsGermany

Personalised recommendations