Abstract
Habitat used for predator escape may be a factor limiting restoration of desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) in small mountain ranges in New Mexico. Female bighorn sheep seek isolation in discrete areas for parturition. Although parturition sites are used only for <3 days they play an important role in neonate survival. We compared habitat characteristics at pre-parturition (n = 21), parturition (n = 38), random (n = 38), and post-parturition sites (n = 21). At each site we calculated distance to steep terrain, elevation, ruggedness, slope, and visibility. Parturition and post-parturition sites were higher in elevation and more rugged than sites used during pre-parturition. Post-parturition sites were closer to terrain with 100% slope than the pre-parturition or parturition sites. Post-parturition sites had higher visibility and steeper slopes than the pre-parturition sites. Parturition sites were steeper, higher in elevation, more rugged, and had lower visibility than the random sites. Fidelity to parturition sites was observed on 1 of 38 occasions. Because lambing sites are used for short periods they are poorly understood and often ignored by land managers. Additional research is recommended in other desert bighorn sheep populations to understand better and predict habitat use during the lambing period.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armentrout DJ, Brigham WR (1988) Habitat suitability rating system for desert bighorn sheep in the Basin and Range Province. US Bur Land Manage Tech Note 384
Bangs PD,Krausman PR, Kunkel KE, Parsons ZD (2005) Habitat use by female desert bighorn sheep in the Fra Cristobal Mountains, New Mexico, USA, Europe J Wildl Res 51:(in press)
Berger J (1991) Pregnancy incentives, predation constraints and habitat shifts: experimental and field evidence for wild bighorn sheep. Anim Behav 41:61–77
Bleich VC (1982) An illustrated guide to aging the lambs of mountain sheep (Ovis canadensis ssp.). Desert Bighorn Counc Trans 26:59–62
Bleich VC (1999) Mountain sheep and coyotes: patterns of predator evasion in a mountain ungulate. J Mammal 80:283–287
Bleich VC, Bowyer RT, Wehausen JD (1997) Sexual segregation in mountain sheep: resources or predation. Wildl Monog 134
Bunnel FL (1982) The lambing period of mountain sheep: synthesis, hypothesis, and tests. Can J Zool 60:1–14
Creeden PJ (1986) The ecology of desert bighorn sheep in Colorado. Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
DeForge JR, Scott JE (1982) Ecological investigations into high lamb mortality of desert bighorn sheep in the Santa Rosa Mountains, California. Desert Bighorn Counc Trans 26:65–76
Dunn WC (1994) Evaluation of desert bighorn sheep habitat in New Mexico. A revision of the final report. NM Dept Game and Fish, Fed Aid in Wildl Restor Proj W-127-R-7
Durrant AV (1996) Vectors in physics and engineering. Chapman and Hall, London, UK
Etchberger RC, Krausman PR (1999) Frequency of birth and lambing sites of a small population of mountain sheep. Southwest Nat 44:354–360
Festa-Bianchet (1988) Seasonal range selection in bighorn sheep: conflicts between forage quantity, forage quality, and predator avoidance. Oecologia 75:580–586
Field A (2000) Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. Sage Publ, London
Geist V (1971) Mountain sheep: a study in behavior and evolution. Univ Chicago, Chicago
Hansen CG (1965) Growth and development of desert bighorn sheep. J Wildl Manage 29:387–391
Hansen CG, Deming OV (1980) Growth and development. In: Monson G, Sumner L (eds) The desert bighorn. University of Arizona, Tucson, pp 152–171
Hobson RD (1972) Surface roughness in topography: quantitative approach. In: Chorley RJ (ed) Spatial analysis in geomorphology. Methuen and Company, London, pp 221–245
Krausman PR (2000) An introduction to the restoration of bighorn sheep. Restor Ecol 8:3–5
Krausman PR, Leopold BD (1986) The importance of small populations of desert bighorn sheep. Trans N A Wildl and Nat Resour Conf 51:52–61
Krausman PR, Hervert JJ, Ordway LL (1985) Capturing deer and mountain sheep with a net-gun. Wildl Soc Bull 13:71–73
Krausman PR, Dunn WS, Harris LK, Shaw WW, Boyce WM (2002) Can mountain sheep and humans coexist? Intern Wildl Manage Cong 2:224–227
Maloy MA, Dean DJ (2001) An accuracy assessment of various GIS-based viewshed delineation techniques. Photog Engin Remote Sens 67:1293–1298
McCarty CW, Bailey JA (1992) Measuring visual obstruction caused by discrete objects in bighorn sheep habitat. Desert Bighorn Counc Trans 36:1–3
McCarty CW, Bailey JA (1994) Habitat requirements of desert bighorn sheep. Colo Div of Wildl Spec Rep 69:1–36
Nelson EP (1986) Geology of the Fra Cristobal Range, south-central New Mexico. NM Geol Soc Guide 37:83–91
NM Dep Game and Fish (1995) New Mexico’s long-range plan for desert bighorn sheep management, 1995–2002, Final report, Fed Aid in Wildl Restor Proj W-127-R10, Job 1
Oehler MM Sr, Bowyer RT, Bleich VC (2003) Home ranges of mountain sheep: effects of precipitation in a desert ecosystem. Mammalia 69: 337–354
Papouchis CM, Singer FJ, Sloan WB (2001) Responses of desert bighorn sheep to increased human recreation. J Wildl Manage 65:573–582
Pincus HJ (1956) Some vector and arithmetic operations on two-dimensional orientation variates, with applications to geologic data. J Geol 64:533–557
Rachlow JL, Bowyer RT (1991) Interannual variation in timing and synchrony of parturition in Dall’s sheep. J Mamm 72:487–492
Rachlow JL, Bowyer RT (1998) Habitat selection by Dall’s sheep (Ovis dalli): maternal trade-offs. J Zool Lond 245:457–465
Ramsey FL, Shafer DW (2001) The statistical sleuth: a course in methods of data analysis, 2nd edn. Duxbury, Pacific Grove
Risenhoover KL, Bailey JA (1985) Foraging ecology of mountain sheep: implications for habitat management. J Wildl Manage 49:797–804
Rominger EM, Goldstein E (2001) Status of desert bighorn sheep in New Mexico–2000. Desert Bighorn Counc Trans 45:6–12
Scotton BD, Pletscher DH (1998) Evaluation of a capture technique for neonatal Dall sheep. Wildl Soc Bull 26:578–583
Smith TS, Flinders JT, Winn DS (1991) A habitat evaluation procedure for Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep in the intermountain west. Great Basin Natur 51:205–225
Sorensen P, Lanter D (1993) Two algorithms for determining partial visibility and reducing data structure induced error in viewshed analysis. Photog Engin and Remote Sens 59:1149–1160
Thompson RS, Turner JC (1982) Temporal geographic variation in the lambing season of bighorn sheep. Can J Zool 60:1781–1793
Tilton ME (1977) Habitat selection and use by bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) on a north-western Montana winter range. Thesis, University of Montana, Missoula
US Fish and Wildlife Service (1999) Draft recovery plan for the bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges, Portland
Warrick GD, Krausman PR (1989) Barrel cacti consumption by desert bighorn sheep. Southwest Nat 34: 483–486
Witham JH (1983) Desert bighorn sheep in southwestern Arizona. Dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
Zeigenfuss LC, Singer FJ, Gudorf MA (2000) Test of a modified habitat suitability model for bighorn sheep. Restor Ecol 8:38–46
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Sappington for providing GIS support and advice. We appreciate the field assistance of H. Provencio, K. Eulinger, D. Klinka, D. Verhelst, and A. Wright. We thank T. Waddell, D. Wayne, H. Whitlow, M. Phillips, E. Rominger,and other personnel of the Armendaris Ranch and NMDGF for logistical and finacial support. R. Steidl, M. Phillips, and R. Mannan reviewed an earlier draft of this paper and provided valuable advice. We obtained approval of the research protocol by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, The University of Arizona (no. 00–175). This study was funded by the Turner Endangered Species Fund, the School of Natural Resources, and the Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bangs, P.D., Krausman, P.R., Kunkel, K.E. et al. Habitat use by desert bighorn sheep during lambing. Eur J Wildl Res 51, 178–184 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0098-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0098-8