Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Migratory strategies, fawn recruitment, and winter habitat use by urban and rural mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the migratory strategies of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) using adjacent urban and rural winter ranges in northern Utah in relation to deer demography and patterns of habitat use. Urban deer were more likely to be migratory than rural deer, even though migratory animals from the two herds intermixed on a common, high-elevation summer range. Urban deer exhibited lower fawn recruitment than rural deer; but within each herd, demographic characteristics of migratory and nonmigratory animals suggested that game theory explained the ratios of deer adopting each behavior. Estimates of animal numbers and available habitat did not reveal clearly whether deer densities differed on the two winter ranges. However, patterns of habitat use by urban deer were so clustered around areas of concealment vegetation that animals probably experienced higher local densities than rural animals. In addition, the clustered patterns of habitat use by urban deer resulted in incomplete use of available forage. This may have contributed to the relatively poor fawn recruitment by urban deer, a phenomenon that appeared to be perpetuated by their strong fidelity to winter range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin DD, Urness PJ (1983) Overwinter forage selection by mule deer on seeded big sagebrush-grass range. J Wildl Manag 47:1203–1207

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CG (1992) Movement and migration patterns of mule deer in southeastern Idaho. J Wildl Manag 56:242–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter LH, Wallmo OC, Gill RB (1979) Forage diversity and dietary selection by wintering mule deer. J Range Manag 32:226–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D (1967) Optimization of seasonal migratory behavior. Am Nat 101:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on acceptable field methods in mammalogy: preliminary guidelines approved by the American Society of Mammalogists (1987). J Mammal 68(Suppl):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover MR (1995) What is the urban deer problem and where did it come from? In: McAninch JB (ed) Proceedings of the 1993 symposium of the north central section—The Wildlife Society, pp 11–18

  • Etter DR, Hollis KM, Van Deelen TR, Ludwig DR, Chelsvig JE, Anchor CL, Warner RE (2002) Survival and movements of white-tailed deer in suburban Chicago, Illinois. J Wildl Manag 66:500–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD (1972) Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM, Sinclair ARE (1988) Causes and consequences of migration by large herbivores. Trends Ecol Evol 3:237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrot RA, White GC, Bartmann RM, Carpenter LH, Alldredge AW (1987) Movements of female mule deer in northwest Colorado. J Wildl Manag 51:634–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist V (1981) Behavior: adaptive strategies in mule deer. In: Wallmo OC (ed) Mule and black-tailed deer of North America. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 157–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruell GE, Papez NZ (1967) Movements of mule deer in Northwestern Nevada. J Wildl Manag 27:414–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Grund MD, McAnnich JB, Wiggers EP (2001) Seasonal movement and habitat use of female white-tailed deer associated with an urban park. J Wildl Manag 66:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs NT (1989) Linking energy balance to survival in mule deer: development and test of a simulation model. Wildl Monogr 101:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Kie JG, Baldwin JA, Evans CJ (1994) CALHOME: home range analysis program. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southeast Research Station, Fresno

  • Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu CW, Byers CR, Peek JM, Boy V (1974) A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J Wildl Manage 38:541–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson MC, Bowyer RT, Kie JG (1997) Habitat selection and survival of mule deer: tradeoffs associated with migration. J Mammal 78:483–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DF (1981) Conflicts with civilization. In: Wallmo OC (ed) Mule and black-tailed deer of North America. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 509–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinette WL (1967) Mule deer home range and dispersal in Utah. J Wildl Manage 30:335–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel CP (1932) Seasonal migration of mule deer. Ecol Monogr 2:1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc (1988) SAS/STAT user’s guide, release 6.03 edition. SAS Institute, Cary

  • Smith DO, Donner M, Loft ER (1989) The distribution of winter mule deer use around home sites. Trans Western States Sect Wildl Soc 25:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel WO (1989) Response of deer to density and distribution of housing in Montana. Wildl Soc Bull 17:406–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallmo OC, Regelin WL (1981) Rocky Mountain and Intermountain habitats. In: Wallmo OC (ed) Mule and black-tailed deer of North America. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 387–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren RJ (1997) The challenge of deer overabundance in the 21st century. Wildl Soc Bull 25:213–214

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC (1996) NOREMARK: population estimation from mark-resighting surveys. Wildl Soc Bull 24:50–52

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Garrot RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Shenk TM (2001) Population estimation with radio-marked animals. In: Millspaugh JJ, Marzluff JM (eds) Radiotracking of animal populations. Academic, New York, pp 329–350

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial and logistical support for this research was provided by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UTDWR), the Boone and Crockett Club, the Jack Berryman Institute, and the Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. We thank DD Austin, J Kimball, and W Shields of UTDWR for their personal contributions to this study. Field assistance by CB McClure, CE Shaw, G Tucker, T Veenendaal, and GR Wiscomb was appreciated greatly. We especially thank the homeowners that allowed us to capture deer in their yards. We extend special thanks posthumously to JB Low and PJ Urness who provided helpful advice during the early stages of this project. All aspects of this project complied with the laws of the United States and the laws of the two states (Utah and Idaho) where study animals lived. An anonymous reviewer greatly improved this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark F. McClure.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McClure, M.F., Bissonette, J.A. & Conover, M.R. Migratory strategies, fawn recruitment, and winter habitat use by urban and rural mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Eur J Wildl Res 51, 170–177 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0086-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0086-z

Keywords

Navigation