Patterns of hunting mortality in Norwegian moose (Alces alces) populations

Abstract

We used a simple life table approach to examine the age-specific patterns of harvest mortality in eight Norwegian moose populations during the last 15 years and tried to determine if the observed patterns were caused by hunter selectivity. The general opinion among local managers is that hunters prefer to shoot female moose not in company with calves to keep a high number of reproductive females in the population (and because of the emotional stress involved in leaving the calf/calves without a mother), and relatively large males because of the higher return with respect to meat and trophy. In support of the former view, we found the harvest mortality of adult females to be higher among pre-prime (1–3 years old) than prime-aged age classes (4–7 years old). This is probably because prime-aged females are more fecund and, therefore, more likely to be in company with one or two calves during the hunting season. As the season progressed, however, the selection pressure on barren females decreased, probably due to more productive females becoming ‘legal’ prey as their calf/calves were harvested. In males, we did not find any evidence of strong age-specific hunter selectivity, despite strong age-dependent variation in body mass and antler size. We suggest that this was due to the current strongly female-biased sex ratio in most Norwegian moose populations, which leaves the hunters with few opportunities to be selective within a relatively short and intensive hunting season. The management implications of these findings and to what extent the results are likely to affect the future evolution of life histories in Norwegian moose populations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Boer AH (1988) Mortality rates of moose in New Brunswick—a life table analysis. J Wildl Manage 52:21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information–theoretic approach. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bronikowski AM, Clark ME, Rodd FH, Reznick DN (2002) Population-dynamic consequences of predator-induced life-history variation in the guppy (Poecilia reticulate). Ecology 83:2194–2204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Case TJ (2000) An illustrated guide to theoretical ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caughley G (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chamberlain MJ, Leopold BD, Burger LW, Plowman BW, Conner LM (1999) Survival and cause-specific mortality of adult bobcats in central Mississippi. J Wildl Manage 63:613–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coltman DW, O’Donoughue P, Jorgenson JT, Hogg JT, Strobeck C, Festa-Bianchet M (2003) Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426:655–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coulson T, Guinness F, Pemberton J, Clutton-Brock T (2004) The demographic consequences of releasing a population of red deer from culling. Ecology 85:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Courtois R, Labonte J, Ouellet JP (1998) Movements and location of home range of moose, Alces alces, in eastern Quebec. Can Field Nat 112:602–610

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crete M, Taylor RJ, Jordan PA (1981) Optimization of moose harvest in southwestern Quebec. J Wildl Manage 45:598–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ericsson G (2001) Reversed cost of reproduction in moose Alces alces through human harvest. Alces 37:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ericsson G, Wallin K (1999) Hunter observations as an index of moose Alces alces population parameters. Wildlife Biol 5:177–185

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ericsson G, Wallin K (2001) Age-specific moose (Alces alces) mortality in a predator-free environment: evidence for senescence in females. Ecoscience 8:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ericsson G, Boman M, Mattsson L (2000) Selective versus random moose harvesting: does it pay to be a prudent predator? J Bioecon 2:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ericsson G, Wallin K, Ball JP, Broberg M (2001) Age-related reproductive effort and senescence in free-ranging moose, Alces alces. Ecology 82:1613–1620

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ernande B, Dieckmann U, Heino M (2004) Adaptive changes in harvested populations: plasticity and evolution of age and size at maturation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferguson (2002) Using survivorship curves to estimate age at first reproduction in moose Alces alces. Wildlife Biol 8:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ginsberg JR, Milner-Gulland EJ (1994) Sex-biased harvesting and population-dynamics in ungulates—implications for conservation and sustainable use. Conserv Biol 8:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haagenrud H (1978) Layers of secondary dentine in incisors as age criteria in moose (Alces alces). J Mammal 59:857–858

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanks J (1981) Characterization of population condition. In: Fowler CW, Smith TD (eds) Dynamics of large mammal populations. Wiley, New York, pp 47–73

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harris RB, Wall WA, Allendorf FW (2002) Genetic consequences of hunting: what do we know and what should we do? Wildl Soc Bull 30:634–643

    Google Scholar 

  22. Koivula M, Koskela E, Mappes T, Oksanen TA (2003) Cost of reproduction in the wild: manipulation of reproductive effort in the bank vole. Ecology 84:398–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Langvatn R (1992) Analysis of ovaries in studies of reproduction in red deer (Cervus elaphus): applications and limitations. Rangifer 12:67–91

    Google Scholar 

  25. Langvatn R, Bakke O, Engen S (1994) Retrospective studies of red deer reproduction using regressing luteal structures. J Wildl Manage 58:654–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lavsund S, Nygren T, Solberg EJ (2003) Status of moose populations and challenges in moose management in Fennoscandia. Alces 39:109–130

    Google Scholar 

  27. Noyce KV, Garshelis DL, Coy PL (2001) Differential vulnerability of black bears to trap and camera sampling and resulting biases in mark–recapture estimates. URSUS 12:211–226

    Google Scholar 

  28. Olsen EM, Heino M, Lilly GR, Morgan MJ, Brattey J, Ernande B, Dieckmann U (2004) Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod. Nature 428:932–935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Palkovacs EP (2003) Explaining adaptive shifts in body size on islands: a life history approach. Oikos 103:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peterson RL (1955) North American moose. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2005) Can commercial fishing cause evolution? Answers from guppies (Poecilia reticulate). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:791–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sand H (1996) Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia 106:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sand H (1998) Costs of reproduction in female moose (Alces alces) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations. Can J Zool 76:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sibly RM, Barker D, Denham MC, Hone J, Page M (2005) On the regulation of populations of mammals, birds, fish and insects. Science 309:607–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E (1994) Male traits as life-history variables—Annual variation in body-mass and antler size in moose (Alces alces). J Mammal 75:1069–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E (1999) Hunter observations of moose Alces alces as a management tool. Wildlife Biol 5:107–117

    Google Scholar 

  37. Solberg EJ, Heim M, Sæther B-E, Holmstrøm F (1997) Oppsummering overvåkningsprogram for hjortevilt-Elg. NINA Fagrapp 30:1–68 (in Norwegian with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E, Strand O, Loison A (1999) Dynamics of a harvested moose population in a variable environment. J Anim Ecol 68:186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Solberg EJ, Loison A, Sæther B-E, Strand O (2000) Age-specific harvest mortality in a Norwegian moose Alces alces population. Wildlife Biol 6:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  40. Solberg EJ, Loison A, Ringsby TH, Sæther B-E, Heim M (2002) Biased adult sex ratio can affect fecundity in primiparous moose Alces alces. Wildlife Biol 8:117–128

    Google Scholar 

  41. Solberg EJ, Loison A, Gaillard JM, Heim M (2004) Lasting effects of conditions at birth on moose body mass. Ecography 27:677–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Solberg EJ, Grøtan V, Rolandsen C, Brøseth H, Brainerd S (2005) Change-in-sex ratio as an estimator of population size for Norwegian moose Alces alces. Wildlife Biol 11:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  44. Storaas T, Gundersen H, Henriksen H, Andreassen HP (2001) The economic value of moose in Norway—a review. Alces 37:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stubsjøen T, Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Heim M, Rolandsen CM (2000) Moose (Alces alces) survival in three populations in northern Norway. Can J Zool 78:1822–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sutherland WJ (1990) Evolution and fisheries. Nature 344:814–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Swenson JE, Sandegren F, Bjarvall A, Soderberg A, Wabakken P, Franzen R (1994) Size, trend, distribution and conservation of the brown bear Ursus arctos population in Sweden. Biol Conserve 70:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sæther B-E, Haagenrud H (1985) Life history of the moose Alces alces: relationship between growth and reproduction. Holarct Ecol 8:100–106

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sæther B-E, Heim M (1993) Ecological correlates of individual variation in age at maturity in female moose (Alces alces): the effects of environmental variability. J Anim Ecol 62:482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sæther BE, Engen S, Solberg EJ (2001) Optimal harvest of age-structured populations of moose Alces alces in a fluctuating environment. Wildlife Biol 7:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Heim M (2003) Effects of altering sex ratio on the demography of an isolated moose population. J Wildl Manage 67:455–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Heim M, Stacy JE, Jakobsen KS, Olstad R (2004) Offspring sex ratio in moose Alces alces in relation to paternal age: an experiment. Wildlife Biol 10:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tavecchia G, Coulson T, Morgan BJT, Pemberton JM, Pilkington JC, Gulland FMD, Clutton-Brock TH (2005) Predictors of reproductive cost in female Soay sheep. J Anim Ecol 74:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Testa JW (2004) Population dynamics and life history trade-offs of moose (Alces alces) in south-central Alaska. Ecology 85:1439–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Statistics and computing. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wabakken P, Sand H, Liberg O, Bjarvall A (2001) The recovery, distribution, and population dynamics of wolves on the Scandinavian peninsula, 1978–1998. Can J Zool 79:710–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wallin K, Cederlund G, Pehrson Å (1996) Predicting body mass from chest circumference in moose Alces alces. Wildlife Biol 2:53–58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jos Milner, Nils Chr. Stenseth, Anne Loison and two anonymous referees for useful comments on the manuscript. EBN was funded by a grant from Norwegian Research Council (NFR proj. nr 156367/530).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erlend B. Nilsen.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nilsen, E.B., Solberg, E.J. Patterns of hunting mortality in Norwegian moose (Alces alces) populations. Eur J Wildl Res 52, 153–163 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0023-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hunter selectivity
  • Life table analysis
  • Moose
  • Mortality