Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing camera traps for surveying the European mink, Mustela lutreola (Linnaeus, 1761), distribution

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the suitability of camera trapping as a method for detecting the European mink and determining its distribution in a region located in southwestern Europe. Using this technique, 98 river stretches were surveyed, resulting in the detection of 11 species of carnivores. A high photographic rate was obtained for the European mink, and we were able to get a picture of its distribution area in the year 2000. No seasonal differences were found in the efficiency of the method used. Camera trapping is an effective technique that provides quick updates of the distribution of the European mink and may be used in programs monitoring this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–c
Fig. 2

References

  • Buskirk SW, Lindstedt SL (1989) Sex biases in trapped samples of Mustelidae. J Mammal 70:88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone C, Christie S, Conforti K, Coulson T, Franklin N, Ginsberg JR, Griffiths M, Holden J, Kawanishi K, Kinnaird M, Laidlaw R, Lynam A, MacDonald DW, Martyr D, McDougal C, Narth L, O’Brien T, Seidensticker J, Smith DJL, Sunquist M, Tilson R, Wan Shahruddin WN (2001) The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Anim Conserv 4:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castién E, Mendiola I (1985) Atlas de los mamíferos continentales de Álava, Vizcaya y Guipúzcoa. In: Álvarez J, Bea A, Faus JM, Castién E, Mendiola I (eds) Atlas de los vertebrados continentales de Álava, Vizcaya y Guipúzcoa. Gobierno Vasco, Vitoria-Gasteiz, pp 271–325

  • Cutler TL, Swann DE (1999) Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildl Soc Bull 27:571–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge S, Sandell M (1986) Seasonal changes in the social organisation of male stoats, Mustela erminea: an effect of shifts between two decisive resources. Oikos 47:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Garin I, Zuberogoitia I, Zabala J, Aihartza J, Clevenger AP, Rallo A (2002) Home ranges of European mink, Mustela lutreola, in southwestern Europe. Acta Theriol 47:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LLC, Raphael MG (1993) Inexpensive camera systems for detecting martens, fishers, and other animals: guidelines for use and standardization. United States Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon

  • Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucera TE, Soukkala AM, Zielinski WJ (1995) Photographic bait stations. In: Zielinski WJ, Kucera TE (eds) American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine: survey methods for their detection. United States Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Berkeley, California

  • Maizeret CH, Migot P, Galineau H, Grisser P, Lode T (1998) Répartition et habitats du Vison d’Europe (Mustela lutreola) en France. Actes du Colloque Francophone de Mammalogie (Amiens 4–5 octobre 1997). N° spécial Arvicola, pp 67–72

  • Maran T (1999) Mustela lutreola (Linnaeus, 1761). In: Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W, Krystufek B, Reijnders PJH, Spitzenberger F, Stubbe M, Thissen JBM, Vohralík V, Zima J (eds) The atlas of European mammals. T & AD Poyser, London, pp 78–79

  • Moruzzi TL, Fuller TK, de Graaf RM, Brooks RT, Li W (2002) Assessing remotely triggered cameras for surveying carnivore distribution. Wildl Soc Bull 30:380–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazón S, Ruiz-Olmo J (1997) El visón europeo y el visón americano en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid

  • Tuyttens FAM, MacDonald DW, Delahay R, Rogers LM, Mallinson PJ, Donnelly CA, Newman C (1999) Differences in trapability of European badgers Meles meles in three populations in England. J Appl Ecol 36:1051–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Iñaki Aizpuru and Iñigo Mendiola (Agriculture and Environment Department, Provincial Council of Gipuzkoa), Jaime Feliú (Agriculture and Fishing Department, Basque Government), and Luis Mariano González (Directorate-General for Nature Conservation, Spain) for their assistance in making this work possible. This study was funded by the Agriculture and Environment Department of the Provincial Council of Gipuzkoa, the Agriculture and Fishing Department of the Basque Government, and the Directorate-General for Nature Conservation, Spain. The suggestions of one anonymous referee substantially improved the original manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. González-Esteban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González-Esteban, J., Villate, I. & Irizar, I. Assessing camera traps for surveying the European mink, Mustela lutreola (Linnaeus, 1761), distribution. Eur J Wildl Res 50, 33–36 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-003-0031-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-003-0031-y

Keywords

Navigation