Abstract
Salinity is the most prevalent abiotic stress faced by plants. Crop improvement can be achieved using genetic diversity. Therefore, this study aimed to identify relative salinity tolerant varieties among five rice mutant genotypes, which were screened between 100 genotypes through fundamental germination and seedling evaluations. The experiment was conducted as split-plot arrangement based on a randomized complete block design with four replications. The treatments consisted of salinity levels (0, 45, 75 mM) as the main plot and mutant genotypes (Tarom Hashemi1 (TH-1), Tarom Hashemi2 (TH-2) and Tarom Hashemi3 (TH-3), Tarom Chaloosi (TC), and Nemat (N)) as subplots. Thirty-day-old rice seedlings were transferred to the plots. One week later, all genotypes were exposed to salinity stress. There has been a positive and significant correlation between shoot dry weight, catalase, and guaiacol peroxidase; in contrast, a significantly negative correlation was observed between shoot dry weight and malondialdehyde. The chlorophyll a and carotenoid contents significantly reduced under salinity, except for TC; while proline, catalase content, and root Na+/K+ ratio increased in all rice genotypes. The lowest and the highest malondialdehyde content was recorded in TC and TH‑1 under 75 mM, respectively. Overall, more salt-tolerant plants showed osmotic adaptation mechanisms by activating antioxidant enzymes, whereas MDA increased in sensitive cultivars. Furthermore, principal component analysis based on salinity tolerance indexes distinguished that TC could be a more tolerant genotype compared with others. Overall, this salt-tolerant genotype could be selected to develop salt-tolerant rice varieties with high yields in the future.
Zusammenfassung
Versalzung ist der häufigste abiotische Stress, dem Pflanzen ausgesetzt sind. Die Verbesserung von Kulturpflanzen kann durch genetische Vielfalt erreicht werden. Ziel dieser Studie war es daher, relativ salztolerante Sorten unter fünf Reis-Mutantengenotypen zu identifizieren, die unter 100 Genotypen durch grundlegende Keimungs- und Sämlingsbewertungen ausgewählt wurden. Der Versuch wurde als Split-Plot-Anordnung auf der Grundlage eines randomisierten vollständigen Blockversuchs mit vier Wiederholungen durchgeführt. Die Behandlungen bestanden aus den Salzgehaltsstufen (0, 45, 75 mM) als Hauptplot und den Mutantengenotypen (Tarom Hashemi1 (TH-1), Tarom Hashemi2 (TH-2) und Tarom Hashemi3 (TH-3), Tarom Chaloosi (TC) und Nemat (N)) als Subplots. Dreißig Tage alte Reissetzlinge wurden eingepflanzt. Eine Woche später wurden alle Genotypen dem Salzstress ausgesetzt. Es wurde eine positive und signifikante Korrelation zwischen dem Trockengewicht der Triebe, der Katalase und der Guajakolperoxidase festgestellt; im Gegensatz dazu wurde eine signifikant negative Korrelation zwischen dem Trockengewicht der Triebe und dem Malondialdehyd-Gehalt beobachtet. Die Gehalte an Chlorophyll a und Carotinoiden nahmen unter dem Salzgehalt signifikant ab, außer bei TC, während Prolin, der Katalasegehalt und das Na+/K+-Verhältnis der Wurzeln bei allen Reisgenotypen zunahmen. Der niedrigste bzw. höchste Malondialdehyd-Gehalt wurde bei TC und TH‑1 bei 75 mM festgestellt. Insgesamt zeigten salztolerantere Pflanzen osmotische Anpassungsmechanismen, indem sie antioxidative Enzyme aktivierten, während der MDA-Gehalt bei empfindlichen Sorten anstieg. Darüber hinaus ergab die Hauptkomponentenanalyse auf der Grundlage der Salztoleranzindizes, dass TC im Vergleich zu anderen ein toleranterer Genotyp sein könnte. Insgesamt könnte dieser salztolerante Genotyp ausgewählt werden, um in Zukunft salztolerante Reissorten mit hohen Erträgen zu entwickeln.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agami RA (2013) Alleviating the adverse effects of NaCl stress in maize seedlings by pretreating seeds with salicylic acid and 24-epibrassinolide. South Afr J Bot 88:171–177
Ajithkumar. P (2017) Morphological and biochemical response to salinity stress on Setaria italic seedlings. J Appl Adv Res 2(4):235–248
Alam N, Ahmad SR, Qadir A et al (2015) Use of statistical and GIS techniques to assess and predict concentrations of heavy metals in soils of Lahore City, Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess 187:1–11
Alam MS, Tester M, Fiene G, Mousa MAA (2021) Early growth stage characterization and the biochemical responses for salinity stress in tomato. Plants 10:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040712
Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39(1):205–207
Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu J‑K (2005) Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci 45(2):437–448
Chowdhury AD, Haritha G, Sunitha T et al (2016) Haplotyping of rice genotypes using simple sequence repeat markers associated with salt tolerance. Rice Sci 23:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2016.05.003
Chunthaburee S, Dongsansuk A, Sanitchon J et al (2016) Physiological and biochemical parameters for evaluation and clustering of rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance at seedling stage. Saudi J Biol Sci 23:467–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.05.013
Deng P, Jiang D, Dong Y, Shi X, Jing W, Zhang W (2015) Physiological characterization and fine mapping of a salt-tolerant mutant in rice (Oryza sativa). Funct Plant Biol 42(11):1026–1035
Edge R, Truscott TG (2018) Singlet oxygen and free radical reactions of retinoids and carotenoids—a review. Antioxidants 7:5
Ekbic E, Cagıran C, Korkmaz K et al (2017) Assessment of watermelon accessions for salt tolerance using stress tolerance indices. Ciên Agrotecnol 41:616–625. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542017416013017
El-Beltagi HS, Ahmad I, Basit A et al (2022) Ascorbic acid enhances growth and yield of sweet peppers (capsicum annum) by mitigating salinity stress. Gesunde Pflanz. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-021-00619-6
Elsheery NI, Cao K‑F (2008) Gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and osmotic adjustment in two mango cultivars under drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant 30(6):769–777
Farooq MA, Saqib ZA, Akhtar J, Faiq H, Pasala BR (2019) Protective role of silicon (si) against combined stress of salinity and boron (B) toxicity by improving antioxidant enzymes activity in rice. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-015-9346-z
Fernandez GCJ (1992) Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress Shanhua, Aug. 13–16, pp 257–270
Fischer RA, Maurer R (1978) Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res 29:897–912
Ghadirnezhad R, Fallah A (2014) Temperature effect on yield and yield components of different rice cultivars in flowering stage. Int J Agron. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/846707
Ghadirnezhad Shiade SR, Esmaeili M, Pirdashti, Nematzade GA (2020) Physiological and biochemical evaluation of six th generation of rice (Oryza sativa L. ) mutant lines under salinity stress. J Plant Process Funct 9:57–72 (In persian)
Ghosh B, Md AN, Gantait S (2016) Response of rice under salinity stress: a review update. Rice Res 4(2):2–9
Ghosh N, Adak MK, Ghosh PD, Gupta S, Gupta DNS, Mandal C (2011) Differential responses of two rice varieties to salt stress. Plant Biotechnol Rep 5(1):89–103
Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48(12):909–930
Hamada AM (1994) Effect of NaCl salinity on growth, pigment and mineral element contents, and gas exchange of broad bean and pea plants. Biol plant 36(1):75–81
Hernández JA, Almansa S (2002) Short-term effects of salt stress on antioxidant systems and leaf water relations of pea leaves. Physiol Plant 115(2):251–257
Hoai NTT, Shim IS, Kobayashi K, Kenji U (2003) Accumulation of some nitrogen compounds in response to salt stress and their relationships with salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Plant Growth Regul 41(2):159–164
Hoang T, Tran T, Nguyen T, Williams B, Wurm P et al (2016) Improvement of salinity stress tolerance in rice: challenges and opportunities. Agronomy 6(4):54
Ini DJ, Oseph BJ (2017) Physiological mechanism of salicylic acid for alleviation of Salt stress in rice. Rice Sci 24(2):97–108
Khare T, Srivastava AK, Suprasanna P, Kumar V (2020) Individual and additive stress impacts of Na+ and Cl‾ on proline metabolism and nitrosative responses in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem 152:44–52
Kibria MG, Hossain M, Murata Y, Hoque MA (2017) Antioxidant defense mechanisms of salinity tolerance in rice genotypes. Rice Sci 24(3):155–162
Kumar V, Shriram V, Nikam TD, Jawali N, Shitole MG (2008) Sodium chloride-induced changes in mineral nutrients and proline accumulation in indica rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance. J Plant Nutr 31(11):1999–2017
Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C (2001) Chlorophylls and Carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Handb Food Anal Chem 2:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471709085.ch21
Ma NL, Che Lah WA, Kadir NA et al (2018) Susceptibility and tolerance of rice crop to salt threat: Physiological and metabolic inspections. PLoS One 13:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192732
Manohara KK, Bhosle SP, Singh NP (2019) Phenotypic diversity of rice landraces collected from Goa state for salinity and agro-morphological traits. Agric Res 8(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-018-0354-2
Morton MJL, Awlia M, Al-Tamimi N et al (2019) Salt stress under the scalpel-dissecting the genetics of salt tolerance. Plant J 97:148–163
Mumtaz MZ, Saqib M, Abbas G, Akhtar J, Qamar Z (2017) Genotypic variation in rice for grain yield and quality as affected by salt-affected field conditions. J Plant Nutr 4167:1–10
Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681
Nakhoda B, Leung H, Mendioro MS, Mohammadi-nejad G, Ismail AM (2012) Isolation, characterization, and field evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa L., Var. IR64) mutants with altered responses to salt stress. F Crop Res 127:191–202
Oladi M, Nematzadeh GH, Rahimi M, Afkhami Ghadi A, Gholizadeh Ghara A, Mozaffari K, Ziaei A (2015) Effect of gamma ray irradiation on diversity in some local and modified rice cultivars. J Nucl Sci Technol 73:87–80 (In Persian)
Omamt EN, Hammes PS, Robbertse PJ (2006) Differences in salinity tolerance for growth and water-use efficiency in some amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) genotypes. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 34(1):11–22
Omisun T, Sahoo S, Saha B, Panda SK (2018) Relative salinity tolerance of rice cultivars native to North East India: a physiological, biochemical and molecular perspective. Protoplasma 255:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1142-8
Pongprayoon W, Tisarum R, Theerawittaya C, Cha-um S (2019) Evaluation and clustering on salt-tolerant ability in rice genotypes (Oryza sativa L. subsp. indica) using multivariate physiological indices. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 25(2):473–483
Rachmawati D, Fatikhasari Z, Lestari MF (2020) The potential of silicate fertilizer for salinity stress alleviation on red rice (Oryza sativa L. ‘SembadaMerah’). IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 423:12041
Rachoski M, Gazquez A, Calzadilla P et al (2015) Chlorophyll fluorescence and lipid peroxidation changes in rice somaclonal lines subjected to salt stress. Acta Physiol Plant. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1865-0
Rasel, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Hossain MA et al (2020) Discerning of rice landraces (Oryza sativa L.) for morpho-physiological, antioxidant enzyme activity, and molecular markers’ responses to induced salt stress at the seedling stage. J Plant Growth Regul 39:41–59
Rasel M, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Hossain MA et al (2021) Screening of salt-tolerant rice landraces by seedling stage phenotyping and dissecting biochemical determinants of tolerance mechanism. J Plant Growth Regul 40:1853–1868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10235-9
Reddy INBL, Kim BK, Yoon IS, Kim KH, Kwon TR (2017) Salt tolerance in rice: focus on mechanisms and approaches. Rice Sci 24(3):123–144
Ritchie SW, Nguyen HT, Holaday AS (1990) Leaf water content and gas-exchange parameters of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Sci 30(1):105–111
Rosielle AA, Hamblin J (1981) Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment 1. Crop Sci 21:943–946
RoyChoudhury A, Roy C, Sengupta DN (2007) Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the heterologous lea gene Rab16A from rice during high salt and water deficit display enhanced tolerance to salinity stress. Plant Cell Rep 26(10):1839–1859
Sadeghi H, Rostami L (2017) Changes in biochemical characteristics and Na and K content of caper (Capparis spinosa L.) seedlings under water and salt stress. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop 118(2):199–206
Saini P, Gani M, Kaur JJ et al (2018) Reactive oxygen species (ROS): A way to stress survival in plants. In Abiotic stress-mediated sensing and signaling in plants: An omics perspective. Springer, Singapore, pp 127–153
Saleh J, Najafi N, Oustan S, Ghasemi-Golezani K, Aliasghrzad N (2019) Silicon affects rice growth, superoxide dismutase activity and concentrations of chlorophyll and proline under different levels and sources of soil salinity. Silicon 11(6):2659–2667
Sharma A, Kumar V, Shahzad B et al (2020) Photosynthetic response of plants under different abiotic stresses: a review. J Plant Growth Regul 39:509–531
Shiade SRG, Boelt B (2020) Seed germination and seedling growth parameters in nine tall fescue varieties under salinity stress. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 70:485–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2020.1779338
Shrivastava P, Kumar R (2015) Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth-promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci 22(2):123–131
Singh AP, Dixit G, Mishra S, Dwivedi S, Tiwari M et al (2015) Salicylic acid modulates arsenic toxicity by reducing its root to shoot translocation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front Plant Sci 6:1–12
Sivakumar J, Prashanth JEP, Rajesh N et al (2020) Principal component analysis approach for comprehensive screening of salt stress-tolerant tomato germplasm at the seedling stage. J Biosci 45:1–11
Sohag AAM, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Brestič M, Afrin S, Sakil MA et al (2020) Exogenous salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide attenuate drought stress in rice. Plant Soil Environ 66(1):7–13
Tabassum R, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Hasanuzzaman M et al (2021) Screening salt-tolerant rice at the seedling and reproductive stages: an effective and reliable approach. Environ Exp Bot 192:104629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104629
Taïbi K, Taïbi F, AitAbderrahim L, Ennajah A, Belkhodja M, Mulet JM (2016) Effect of salt stress on growth, chlorophyll content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defence systems in Phaseolus vulgaris L. South Afr J Bot 105:306–312
Zhang Y, Fang J, Wu X, Dong L (2018) Na+/K+ Balance and transport regulatory mechanisms in weedy and cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) under salt stress. BMC Plant Biol 18:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1586-9
Zhani K, Mariem BF, Fardaous M, Cherif H (2012) Impact of salt stress (NaCl) on growth, chlorophyll content and fluorescence of Tunisian cultivars of chili pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.). J Stress Physiol Biochem 8(4):236–252
Funding
This research was supported by the Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (SANRU).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
S.R. Ghadirnezhad Shiade, H. Pirdashti, M.A. Esmaeili and G.A. Nematzade declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Availability of data and material
“Not applicable”.
Code availability
“Not applicable”.
Supplementary Information
10343_2022_701_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Supplementary file consisted of the physical and chemical characters of the soil table, and Analysis of variance of the effects of salinity and lines and their interaction on studied traits table
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghadirnezhad Shiade, S.R., Pirdashti, H., Esmaeili, M.A. et al. Biochemical and Physiological Characteristics of Mutant Genotypes in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Contributing to Salinity Tolerance Indices. Gesunde Pflanzen 75, 303–315 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00701-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00701-7