Assessing the roles of temperature, carbon inputs and airborne pollen as drivers of fructification in European temperate deciduous forests
- 193 Downloads
We aimed at identifying which drivers control the spatio-temporal variability of fruit production in three major European temperate deciduous tree species: Quercus robur, Quercus petraea and Fagus sylvatica. We analysed the relations of fruit production with airborne pollen, carbon and water resources and meteorological data in 48 French forests over 14 years (1994–2007). In oak, acorn production was mainly related to temperature conditions during the pollen emission period, supporting the pollen synchrony hypothesis. In beech, a temperature signal over the two previous years eclipsed the airborne pollen load. Fruit production in Quercus and Fagus was related to climate drivers, carbon inputs and airborne pollen through strongly nonlinear, genus-specific relations. Quercus and Fagus also differed as regards the secondary growth versus fructification trade-off. While negative relationships were observed between secondary growth and fruit production in beech, more productive years benefited to both secondary growth and reproductive effort in oak.
KeywordsBeech Temperate oaks Fructification Gross primary productivity Pollen Temperature Secondary growth
This paper builds on data gathered over thousands of hours of field and technical work done by: the Office National des Forêts (ONF) foresters, who collected and classified litterfall data; and collaborators of the RNSA network who prepared and analysed pollen observation data. We warmly thank them for their work. We thank Hilaire Martin and Baco Said-Allaoui for their work on early related projects, Sebastien Daviller and Raphaël Aussenac for their helpful technical assistance, and Valentin Journé for pointing papers on the seasonality of fruit production in beech. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that helped improving the paper.
FL, ND and ED designed the research. FL and ND analysed the data and wrote the manuscript, with inputs from ED, SC, SM, LC, and MN collected and prepared the fructification data. FL collected and prepared the ring width and climate data. ND prepared the CASTANEA simulations and the pollen data.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aubin I, Munson AD, Cardou F, Burton PJ, Isabel N, Pedlar JH, Paquette A, Taylor AR, Delagrange S, Kebli H et al (2016) Traits to stay, traits to move: a review of functional traits to assess sensitivity and adaptive capacity of temperate and boreal trees to climate change. Environ Rev 24:164–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bogdziewicz M, Szymkowiak J, Kasprzyk I, Grewling L, Borowski Z, Borycka K, Kantorowicz W, Myszkowska D, Piotrowicz K, Ziemianin M, Pesendorfer MB (2017b) Masting in wind-pollinated trees: system-specific roles of weather and pollination dynamics in driving seed production. Ecology 98:2615–2625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonnet-Masimbert M (1984) Biologie florale et cycle de reproduction de quelques arbres forestiers. Douglas, pin sylvestre, chêne. In: Pesson P, Louveaux J (eds) Pollinisation et productions végétales. INRA éditions, Paris, pp 219–242Google Scholar
- Brêthes A, Ulrich E, Lanier M, Clausse M, Colombet M, Curt T, Delahaye-Panchout M, Bermaux B, Douzon G, Duthy X, Guitton J, Nouals D, Savoie JM, Sinet JF, Poulin F, Musch J (1997) Caractéristiques pédologiques des 102 peuplements du réseau. Office National des Forêts, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Crone EE, Rapp JM (2014) Resource depletion, pollen coupling, and the ecology of mast seeding. In: Ostfeld RS, Power AG (eds) Year in ecology and conservation biology. Wiley, New York, pp 21–34Google Scholar
- Delpierre N, Soudani K, Francois C, Le Maire G, Bernhofer C, Kutsch W, Misson L, Rambal S, Vesala T, Dufrene E (2012) Quantifying the influence of climate and biological drivers on the interannual variability of carbon exchanges in European forests through process-based modelling. Agric For Meteorol 154:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carre G, Marquez JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitao PJ, Munkemuller T, McClean C, Osborne PE, Reineking B, Schroder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ehrlinger J (2015) ggRandomForests: random forests for regression. [WWW document] URL. Accessed 1 Sept 2016Google Scholar
- Evans JS, Murphy MA, Holden ZA, Cushman SA (2009) Modeling Species Distribution and Change Using Random Forest. C.A. Drew et al. (eds.), Predictive Species and Habitat Modeling in Landscape Ecology, Concepts and Applications, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7390-0_8, Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2011, 139-159
- Guillemot J, Delpierre N, Vallet P, François C, Martin-StPaul NK, Soudani K, Nicolas M, Badeau V, Dufrêne E (2014) Assessing the effects of management on forest growth across France: insights from a new functional—structural model. Ann Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu059 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Guillemot J, Martin-StPaul NK, Dufrêne E, François C, Soudani K, Ourcival JM, Delpierre N (2015) The dynamic of the annual carbon allocation to wood in European tree species is consistent with a combined source–sink limitation of growth: implications for modelling. Biogeosciences 12:2773–2790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hedhly A, Hormaza JI, Herrero M (2007) Warm temperatures at bloom reduce fruit set in sweet cherry. J Appl Bot Food Qual 81:158–164Google Scholar
- Hurrell JW, Kushnir Y, Ottersen G, Visbeck M (2003) An overview of the North Atlantic oscillation. The North Atlantic oscillation: climatic significance and environmental impact. Geophys Monogr 134:1–35Google Scholar
- Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2–3:18–22Google Scholar
- McLaughlin JM, Greene DW (1991) Fruit and hormones influence flowering of apple. II. Effects of hormones. J Am Soc Hort Sci 116:450–453Google Scholar
- Miyazaki Y, Maruyama Y, Chiba Y, Kobayashi MJ, Joseph B, Shimizu KK, Mochida K, Hiura T, Kon H, Satake A (2014) Nitrogen as a key regulator of flowering in Fagus crenata: understanding the physiological mechanism of masting by gene expression analysis. Ecol Lett 17:1299–1309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nussbaumer A, Waldner P, Etzold S, Gessler A, Benham S, Thomsen IM, Jorgensen BB, Timmermann V, Verstraeten A, Sioen G et al (2016) Patterns of mast fruiting of common beech, sessile and common oak, Norway spruce and Scots pine in Central and Northern Europe. For Ecol Manag 363:237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oswald H (1984) Floraison, pollinisation et fructification chez le Hêtre (Fagus sylvatica L.). In: Pesson P, Louveaux J (eds) Pollinisation et productions végétales. INRA éditions, Paris, pp 243–258Google Scholar
- Peaucelle M (2011) Time trends in forest litterfall production and relationships with environmental changes: an exploratory approach on data collected from 1995 to 2007 in the RENECOFOR monitoring network. Office National des Forêts, Département des Recherches Techniques, FranceGoogle Scholar
- Stenseth NC, Ottersen G, Hurrell JW, Mysterud A, Lima M, Chan KS, Yoccoz NG, Adlandsvik B (2003) Studying climate effects on ecology through the use of climate indices: the North Atlantic Oscillation, El Nino Southern Oscillation and beyond. Proc Biol Sci 270:2087–2096CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1955) The water balance, vol 8. Drexel Institute of Climatology Laboratory, Climatology publication, Centerton, pp 1–104Google Scholar
- Wright SJ, Carrasco C, Calderon O, Paton S (1999) The El Nino Southern Oscillation variable fruit production, and famine in a tropical forest. Ecology 80:1632–1647Google Scholar