European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 136, Issue 3, pp 543–554 | Cite as

A management tool for reducing the potential risk of windthrow for coastal Casuarina equisetifolia L. stands on Hainan Island, China

  • Jinghui MengEmail author
  • Yanfeng Bai
  • Weisheng Zeng
  • Wu Ma
Original Paper


Coastal forests are normally established to mitigate coastal natural disasters instead of artificial barriers because of their low cost, ecological friendliness and economic benefits. The stand stability of coastal forests is of great importance to protect against coastal natural disasters. In the present study, we produced a stand density management diagram (SDMD) that can quantitatively guide the management of stand density to reduce the potential risk of windthrow in the coastal Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations in southern China. The SDMD was developed using a relative spacing index (RS), average slenderness coefficient (SC) and a system of two equations as the basic components. The RS was used to characterize the growing stock, and the average SC was included to assess stand stability. Finally, we illustrated the application of the SDMD in formulating thinning schedules to secure stand stability. For comparison purposes, management options both with and without considering stand stability were produced and discussed. The study indicated that the SDMD produced here can provide detailed quantitative guidance of regulating stand density to secure stand stability for C. equisetifolia plantations. Additionally, this SDMD can be used to develop thinning schedules for a wide range of site qualities and management objectives for C. equisetifolia plantations.


Coastal natural disasters Stand density management diagram Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantation Stand stability 



We thank the Daodong Forest Farm in northeast Hainan Province in South China for their support during our research. We thank Professor Yuanchang Lu in Chinese Academy of Forestry for providing the data. This study was supported by Research and Experimental Demonstration of Multi-functional Forest Silviculture Regimes in China and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31300532).


  1. Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309:1036–1039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alson R, Alexander D, Leonard RB, Stringer LW (1993) Analysis of medical treatment at a field hospital following Hurricane Andrew, 1992. Ann Emerg Med 22:1721–1728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrio-Anta M, Álvarez-González J (2005) Development of a stand density management diagram for even-aged pedunculate oak stands and its use in designing thinning schedules. Forestry 78:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becquey J, Riou-Nivert P (1987) L’existence de” zones de stabilité” des peuplements. Conséquences sur la gestion. Revue Forestière Française, 1987, 4, fascicule thématique” Les Chablis”Google Scholar
  5. Bern C, Sniezek J, Mathbor G, Siddiqi MS, Ronsmans C, Chowdhury A, Choudhury A, Islam K, Bennish M, Noji E (1993) Risk factors for mortality in the Bangladesh cyclone of 1991. Bull World Health Organ 71:73PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Borders BE (1989) Systems of equations in forest stand modeling. For Sci 35:548–556Google Scholar
  7. Burkhart HE, Tomé M (2012) Modeling forest trees and stands. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castano-Santamaria J, Barrio-Anta M, Alvarez-Alvarez P (2013) Regional-scale stand density management diagrams for Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) stands in north-west Spain. For Biogeosci For 6:113–122Google Scholar
  9. Castedo-Dorado F, Crecente-Campo F, Álvarez-Álvarez P, Barrio-Anta M (2009) Development of a stand density management diagram for radiata pine stands including assessment of stand stability. Forestry 82:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chowdhury AMR, Bhuyia AU, Choudhury AY, Sen R (1993) The Bangladesh cyclone of 1991: why so many people died. Disasters 17:291–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Combs DL, Parrish RG, McNABB SJ, Davis JH (1996) Deaths related to hurricane Andrew in Florida and Louisiana, 1992. Int J Epidemiol 25:537–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cremer K, Borough C, McKinnell F, Carter P (1982) Effects of stocking and thinning on wind damage in plantations. NZ J For Sci 12:244–268Google Scholar
  13. Cucchi V, Meredieu C, Stokes A, De Coligny F, Suarez J, Gardiner BA (2005) Modelling the windthrow risk for simulated forest stands of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). For Ecol Manag 213:184–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danso S, Bowen G, Sanginga N (1992) Biological nitrogen fixation in trees in agro-ecosystems. Plant Soil 141:177–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson JO, Gibson AH (1987) Sensitivity of selected Frankia isolates from Casuarina, Allocasuarina and North American host plants to sodium chloride. Physiol Plant 70:272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Zoysa M (2008) Casuarina coastal forest shelterbelts in Hambantota City, Sri Lanka: assessment of impacts. Small Scale For 7:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dean T, Baldwin Jr V (1993) Using a density-management diagram to develop thinning schedules for loblolly pine plantations. USDA Forest Service, South. For Expt Stn Res Pap SO-275Google Scholar
  18. Diagne N, Diouf D, Svistoonoff S, Kane A, Noba K, Franche C, Bogusz D, Duponnois R (2013) Casuarina in Africa: distribution, role and importance of arbuscular mycorrhizal, ectomycorrhizal fungi and Frankia on plant development. J Environ Manag 128:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dommergues Y (1997) Contribution of actinorhizal plants to tropical soil productivity and rehabilitation. Soil Biol Biochem 29:931–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drew TJ, Flewelling JW (1979) Stand density management: an alternative approach and its application to Douglas-fir plantations. For Sci 25:518–532Google Scholar
  21. El-Lakany M (1983) A review of breeding drought resistant Casuarina for shelterbelt establishment in arid regions with special reference to Egypt. For Ecol Manag 6:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evert F (1971) Spacing studies a review. In: Information report FMR-X-37 of the Forest Management Institute. Canadian Forestry Services, Department of the Environment, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  23. Fritz HM, Phillips DA, Okayasu A, Shimozono T, Liu H, Mohammed F, Skanavis V, Synolakis CE, Takahashi T (2012) The 2011 Japan tsunami current velocity measurements from survivor videos at Kesennuma Bay using LiDAR. Geophys Res Lett 39:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gómez-Vázquez I, Fernandes PM, Arias-Rodil M, Barrio-Anta M, Castedo-Dorado F (2014) Using density management diagrams to assess crown fire potential in Pinus pinaster Ait. stands. Ann For Sci 71:473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harada K, Kawata Y (2004) Study on the effect of coastal forest to tsunami reduction. Ann Disaster Prev Res Inst Kyoto UnivGoogle Scholar
  26. Harada K, Imamura F, Hiraishi TL (2002) Experimental study on the effect in reducing tsunami by the coastal permeable structures. In: The twelfth international offshore and polar engineering conference. International society of offshore and polar engineersGoogle Scholar
  27. Ho K, Yang J, Hsiao J (2002) An assessment of genetic diversity and documentation of hybridization of Casuarina grown in Taiwan using RAPD markers. Int J Plant Sci 163:831–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karthikeyan A, Deeparaj B, Nepolean P (2009) Reforestation in bauxite mine spoils with Casuarina equisetifolia frost. and beneficial microbes. For Trees Livelihoods 19:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kenk G (1984) Werteichenproduktion und ihre verbesserung in Baden-Wurttemberg. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift: 428–429Google Scholar
  30. Liu X, Lu Y (2013) Estimation method of wood carbon storage at scale of forest farm management unit. J Beijing For Univ 35:5–10Google Scholar
  31. López-Sánchez C, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R (2009) A density management diagram including stand stability and crown fire risk for Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco in Spain. Mt Res Dev 29:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luis JFS, Fonseca TF (2004) The allometric model in the stand density management of Pinus pinaster Ait. in Portugal. Ann For Sci 61:807–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martín-Alcón S, González-Olabarria JR, Coll L (2010) Wind and snow damage in the Pyrenees pine forests: effect of stand attributes and location. Silva Fenn 44:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mattsson E, Ostwald M, Nissanka S, Holmer B, Palm M (2009) Recovery and protection of coastal ecosystems after tsunami event and potential for participatory forestry CDM–examples from Sri Lanka. Ocean Coast Manag 52:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mazda Y, Parish F, Danielsen F, Imamura F (2007) Hydraulic functions of mangroves in relation to tsunamis. Mangrove Sci 4:57–67Google Scholar
  36. Meng X (1996) Forest mensuration. Chinese Forestry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  37. Meng X (2006) Forest mensuration. Chinese Forestry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller F, Thomalla F, Rockström J (2005) Paths to a sustainable recovery after the tsunami. Sustain Dev Update 5:2–3Google Scholar
  39. Mimura N, Yasuhara K, Kawagoe S, Yokoki H, Kazama S (2011) Damage from the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami-a quick report. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 16:803–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mitchell SJ (2000) Forest health: preliminary interpretations for wind damage. Ministry of Forests, Forest Practices Branch, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  41. Nagaraja B, Maskey N, Somashekara R (2011) Regeneration of native woody species under plantations in Kudremukh National Park, Western Ghats of South India. Int J Biodiv Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 7:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ndiaye P, Mailly D, Pineau M, Margolis HA (1993) Growth and yield of Casuarina equisetifolia plantations on the coastal sand dunes of Senegal as a function of microtopography. For Ecol Manag 56:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Newton P (1997) Stand density management diagrams: review of their development and utility in stand-level management planning. For Ecol Manag 98:251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olwig M, Sørensen M, Rasmussen M, Danielsen F, Selvam V, Hansen L, Nyborg L, Vestergaard K, Parish F, Karunagaran V (2007) Using remote sensing to assess the protective role of coastal woody vegetation against tsunami waves. Int J Remote Sens 28:3153–3169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pardé J, Bouchon J (1988) Forest mensuration. Ecole Nationale du Génie Rural, des Eaux et des Forêts, NancyGoogle Scholar
  46. Parrotta JA, Baker DD, Fried M (1994) Application of 15 N-enrichment methodologies to estimate nitrogen fixation in Casuarina equisetifolia. Can J For Res 24:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peoples MB, Craswell ET (1992) Biological nitrogen fixation: investments, expectations and actual contributions to agriculture. Plant Soil 141:13–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pérez-Cruzado C, Merino A, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R (2011) A management tool for estimating bioenergy production and carbon sequestration in Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens grown as short rotation woody crops in north-west Spain. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2839–2851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pinyopusarerk K, Williams E (2000) Range-wide provenance variation in growth and morphological characteristics of Casuarina equisetifolia grown in Northern Australia. For Ecol Manag 134:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Resh SC, Binkley D, Parrotta JA (2002) Greater soil carbon sequestration under nitrogen-fixing trees compared with Eucalyptus species. Ecosystems 5:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Samarakoon M, Tanaka N, Iimura K (2013) Improvement of effectiveness of existing Casuarina equisetifolia forests in mitigating tsunami damage. J Environ Manag 114:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. SAS I (2004) SAS/STAT® 9.1 user’s guide. SAS Institute Ine Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwintzer CR (2012) The biology of Frankia and actinorhizal plants. Elsevier, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  54. Shaw JD, Long JN (2007) A density management diagram for longleaf pine stands with application to red-cockaded woodpecker habitat. South J Appl For 31:28–38Google Scholar
  55. Sheather S (2009) A modern approach to regression with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Slodicak M (1995) Thinning regime in stands of Norway spruce subjected to snow and wind damage. Wind and Trees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 436–447Google Scholar
  57. Small C, Nicholls RJ (2003) A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. J Coast Res: 584–599Google Scholar
  58. Tanaka N, Sasaki Y, Mowjood M, Jinadasa K, Homchuen S (2007) Coastal vegetation structures and their functions in tsunami protection: experience of the recent Indian Ocean tsunami. Landsc Ecol Eng 3:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tanaka N, Jinadasa K, Mowjood M, Fasly M (2011) Coastal vegetation planting projects for tsunami disaster mitigation: effectiveness evaluation of new establishments. Landsc Ecol Eng 7:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tang X, Pérez-Cruzado C, Vor T, Fehrmann L, Álvarez-González JG, Kleinn C (2016) Development of stand density management diagrams for Chinese fir plantations. Forestry 89:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tani C, Sasakawa H (2003) Salt tolerance of Casuarina equisetifolia and Frankia Ceq1 strain isolated from the root nodules of C. equisetifolia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vacchiano G, Motta R, Long JN, Shaw JD (2008) A density management diagram for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.): a tool for assessing the forest’s protective effect. For Ecol Manag 255:2542–2554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vacchiano G, Derose RJ, Shaw JD, Svoboda M, Motta R (2013) A density management diagram for Norway spruce in the temperate European montane region. Eur J For Res 132:535–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang Y, Titus SJ, LeMay VM (1998) Relationships between tree slenderness coefficients and tree or stand characteristics for major species in boreal mixedwood forests. Can J For Res 28:1171–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wonn HT, O’Hara KL (2001) Height: diameter ratios and stability relationships for four northern Rocky Mountain tree species. West J Appl For 16:87–94Google Scholar
  66. Yang J, Chang T, Chen T, Chen Z (1995) Provenance trial of Casuarina equisetifolia in Taiwan. 1. Seed weight and seedling growth. Bull Taiwan For Res Inst 10:195–207Google Scholar
  67. Zhang L, Hui G, He C (2011) Polymorphic site index model of Casuarina equisetifolia fast-growing plantation. For Res 2:218–222Google Scholar
  68. Zhao H, Kang X, Guo Z, Yang H, Xu M (2012) Species interactions in spruce-fir mixed stands and implications for enrichment planting in the Changbai Mountains, China. Mt Res Dev 32:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhong C, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Jiang Q, Chen Z, Liang J, Pinyopusarerk K, Franche C, Bogusz D (2010) Casuarina research and applications in China. Symbiosis 50:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinghui Meng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yanfeng Bai
    • 2
  • Weisheng Zeng
    • 3
  • Wu Ma
    • 4
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Forest Resources and Ecosystem Processes of BeijingBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Research Institute of ForestryChinese Academy of ForestryBeijingChina
  3. 3.Academy of Forest Inventory and Planning, State Forestry AdministrationBeijingChina
  4. 4.School of Natural ResourcesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations