Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors influencing vole bark damage intensity in managed mountain-forest plantations of Central Europe

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the impact of vole bark gnawing in forest plantations dominated by European beech in two Czech mountain ranges (the Hrubý Jeseník Mts, the Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts) with different habitat conditions. Of the four present vole species, only the field vole caused significant damage, the impact of the bank vole being inconclusive. In both ranges, the key factor determining the presence and abundance of voles (Microtus sp.) was the occurrence of grasses. Saplings in the Hrubý Jeseník Mts suffered significantly higher damage than those in the Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts (13.6 vs. 3.3 % damaged seedlings), with degree of damage closely related to the abundance and spatial distribution of voles. We relate it to lower carrying capacity caused by poor herb layer and higher proportion of spruce monocultures surrounding the plantations in the Hrubý Jeseník Mts. Our results indicate that artificial beech regeneration is more successful in mixed and spruce forests with rich undergrowth (the Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts) than in large spruce stands with reduced herb undergrowth (the Hrubý Jeseník Mts).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baxter R, Hansson L (2001) Bark consumption by small rodents in the northern and southern hemispheres. Mamm Rev 31:47–59. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2001.00078.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson J, Nilsson SG, Franc A, Menozzi P (2000) Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. For Ecol Manag 132:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron J (1996) The use of seedling bark by voles sustained by high proteinic content of food. Ann Zool Fennici 33:259–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Birney EC, Grant WE, Baird DD (1976) Importance of vegetative cover to cycles of Microtus populations. Ecology 57:1043–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D (2008) Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89:2623–2632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borowski Z (2007) Damage caused by rodents in polish forests*. Int J Pest Manag 53:303–310. doi:10.1080/09670870701497253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHKO Beskydy (2015) http://beskydy.ochranaprirody.cz/charakteristika-oblasti/lesnictvi/. In: Lesnictví

  • CHKO Jeseníky (2015) http://jeseniky.ochranaprirody.cz/charakteristika-oblasti/. In: Charakt. Obl

  • Culek M, Grulich V, Laštůvka Z, Divíšek J (2013) Biogeografické regiony České republiky/Biogeographic regions of The Czech Republic. MUNI Press, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies RJ, Pepper HW (1989) The influence of small plastic guards, tree shelters and weed control on damage to young broadleaved trees by field voles (Microtus agrestis). J Environ Manag 28:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F et al (2005) Silviculture-driven vegetation change in a European temperate forest. Ann For Sci 62:313–323. doi:10.1051/forest

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drożdż A (1966) Food habits and food supply of rodents in the beech forest. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 11:363–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durak T (2012) Changes in diversity of the mountain beech forest herb layer as a function of the forest management method. For Ecol Manag 276:154–164. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew JR, Gurnell J, Gipps JHW (1985) The ecology of woodland rodents: bank voles and wood mice: the proceedings of a symposium held at the Zoological Society of London on 23rd and 24th of November 1984. In: The Ecology of woodland rodents: bank voles and wood mice: the proceedings of a symposium held at the Zoological Society of London on 23rd and 24th of November 1984. Oxford University Press, London, p 418

  • Gilbert S, Martel J, Klemola T, Norrdahl K (2013a) Increasing vole numbers cause more lethal damage to saplings in tree monocultures than in mixed stands. Basic Appl Ecol 14:12–19. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2012.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S, Norrdahl K, Martel J, Klemola T (2013b) Vole damage to woody plants reflects cumulative rather than peak herbivory pressure. Ann Zool Fennici 50:189–199. doi:10.5735/085.050.0402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in North temperate forests. 3. Deer. Forestry 65:145–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government decree of The Czech Republic No. 83/1996 M of A (1996) Vyhláška Ministerstva zemědělství o zpracování oblastních plánů rozvoje lesů a o vymezení hospodářských souborů (in Czech)

  • Hansson L (1986) Bark consumption of voles in relation to snow cover, population density and grazing impact. Ecography (Cop) 4:312–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L (1991) Bark consumption by voles in relation to mineral contents. J Chem Ecol 17:735–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L (1992) Vole densities and consumption of bark in relation to soil type and bark mineral content. Scand J For Res 7:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L (2002) Consumption of bark and seeds by voles in relation to habitat and landscape structure. Scand J For Res 17:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L, Henttonen H (1985) Gradients in density variations of small rodents: the importance of latitude and snow cover. Oecologia 67:394–402. doi:10.1007/BF00384946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L, Zejda J (1977) Plant damage by bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus Schreber) and related species in Europe. EPPO Bull 7:223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heroldova M, Suchomel J, Purchart L et al (2007) Small forest rodents—an important factor in the regeneration of forest stands. Beskydy 1:217–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Heroldova M, Janova E, Suchomel J et al (2009) Bark chemical analysis explains selective bark damage by rodents. Beskydy 2:137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Heroldova M, Bryja J, Janova E et al (2012) Rodent damage to natural and replanted mountain forest regeneration. Sci World J 2012:1–6. doi:10.1100/2012/872536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton GM, Packham JR (1997) A sixteen-year record of regional and temporal variation in the fruiting of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in England (1980–1995). Forestry 70:7–16. doi:10.1093/forestry/70.1.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homolka M, Heroldova M, Kamler J (2011) Plant biomass and prediction of debarking caused by rodents in artificial regeneration of forest stands. In: 8th European vertebrate pest management conference, pp 99–100

  • Huitu O, Kiljunen N, Korpimäki E et al (2009) Density-dependent vole damage in silviculture and associated economic losses at a nationwide scale. For Ecol Manag 258:1219–1224. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitu O, Rousi M, Henttonen H (2013) Integration of vole management in boreal silvicultural practices. Pest Manag Sci 69:355–361. doi:10.1002/ps.3264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korslund L, Steen H (2006) Small rodent winter survival: snow conditions limit access to food resources. J Anim Ecol 75:156–166. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01031.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyly M, Klemola T, Koivisto E et al (2014) Varying impacts of cervid, hare and vole browsing on growth and survival of boreal tree seedlings. Oecologia 174:271–281. doi:10.1007/s00442-013-2761-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequentional bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100:403–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S (2004) A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol 15:1044–1045. doi:10.1093/beheco/arh107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesvadbová J, Gaisler J (2000) Communities of terrestrial small mammals in two mountain ecosystems influenced by air pollution. Folia Zool 49:295–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer H, Haase R (2002) The fate of young beech with their stem girth completely debarked by common vole in an afforstation in eastern Holstein. Forst und Holz 57:342–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2002) Understory species patterns and diversity in old- growth and managed northern hardwood forests. Ecol Appl 12:1329–1343. doi:10.2307/3099975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft I (2012) StatSoft. http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/. In: Electron. Stat. Textb

  • Suchomel J, Čepelka L, Purchart L (2012a) Relationship between rodent density, environmental factors and tree damage caused by rodent species. J For Sci 2012:545–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchomel J, Čepelka L, Purchart L (2012b) Small mammals at forest plantations in the Jeseníky Mts (Czech Republic). Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brun 60:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchomel J, Purchart L, Heroldova M et al (2012c) Vole damage to planted tree regeneration conditioned by some environmental factors. Austrian J For Sci 129:56–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchomel J, Purchart L, Čepelka L, Heroldova M (2014) Structure and diversity of small mammal communities of mountain forests in Western Carpathians. Eur J For Res 133:481–490. doi:10.1007/s10342-013-0778-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS (2008) Vole-feeding damage and forest plantation protection: large-scale application of diversionary food to reduce damage to newly planted trees. Crop Prot 27:775–784. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2007.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tast J, Kalela O (1971) Comparisons between rodent cycles and plant production in Finnish Lapland. Ann Acad Sci Fenn B 186:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY

  • Vintonn MA, Burke IC (1995) Interactions between individual plant species and soil nutrient status in shortgrass steppe. Ecology 76:1116–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virjamo V, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Henttonen H et al (2013) Differences in vole preference, secondary chemistry and nutrient levels between naturally regenerated and planted Norway spruce seedlings. J Chem Ecol 39:1322–1334. doi:10.1007/s10886-013-0352-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vooková B (1985) Caloric values of some woody plant species of forest ecosystems of the Malé Karpaty Mountains. Ekológia Bratislava 4:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Zejda J (1981) The small mammal community of a spruce monoculture. Acta Sci Nat Brno 15:1–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Social Fund and the State Budget of the Czech Republic under the project ‘Indicators of Tree Vitality’—Reg. No. CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0265 and with support of RVO 68081766. The authors are very much obliged to Kevin Roche and Eva Čepelková for language correction and the anonymous reviewers for improving of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ladislav Čepelka.

Additional information

Communicated by Claus Bassler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suchomel, J., Purchart, L., Čepelka, L. et al. Factors influencing vole bark damage intensity in managed mountain-forest plantations of Central Europe. Eur J Forest Res 135, 331–342 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-0938-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-0938-y

Keywords

Navigation