Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Forests for wood production and stress recovery: trade-offs in long-term forest management planning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forests play an important role, contributing to human health and well-being as environments for recreation and rehabilitation. Stress has become a significant problem in modern societies, and the importance of forests as environments for stress relief has been recognized in recent years. To maintain and create forests for rehabilitation, consideration of their rehabilitation value needs to be incorporated into forest management planning and to do this, we need to define and quantify the characteristics of good rehabilitation forests. This study presents an approach for including rehabilitation value as an aspect of forest management planning. This approach is applied to three case study areas in northern, middle and southern Sweden to identify trade-offs between maintaining high wood production while creating forest areas suitable for rehabilitation from stress-related diseases. The results show that quite large areas of rehabilitation forest (10–15 % of total forest area) can be maintained at a relatively small loss in economic net present value (NPV) of wood production (ca 2 % of maximum NPV). When using the rehabilitation value indicator defined in this study, age and spatial variables (distance to roads and water) seem to be the most limiting factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adevi A, Mårtensson F (2013) Stress rehabilitation through garden therapy: the garden as a place in the recovery from stress. Urban For Urban Green. 12(2):30–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annerstedt M, Norman J, Boman M, Mattsson L, Grahn P, Währborg P (2010) Finding stress relief in a forest. Ecol Bull 53:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunberg T (1995) Basic data for productivity norms for heavy-duty single-grip harvesters in final felling. Skogforsk, Redogörelse 8. (In Swedish with English summary.)

  • Brunberg T (1997) Underlag för produktionsnorm för engreppsskördare i gallring. Skogforsk, Redogörelse 8. (In Swedish with English summary.)

  • Brunberg T (2004) Underlag till produktionsnorm för skotare. Skogforsk, Redogörelse 3. (In Swedish with English summary.)

  • Davis LS, Johnson KN, Bettinger PS, Howard TE (2001) Forest Management, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DM, Jay M, Jensen FS, Lucas B, Marzano M, Montagné C, Peace A, Weiss W (2010) Public preferences for silvicultural attributes of European forests. EFORWOOD Report D2.3.3, Forest Research, UK

  • Edwards DM, Jay M, Jensen FS, Lucas B, Marzano M, Montagné C, Peace A, Weiss G (2012) Public preferences across Europe for different forest stand types as sites for recreation. Ecol Soc. 17(1): article 27

  • Eriksson L, Lindhagen A (2001) A model indicating effects of multi-purpose use of forestry at the stand level. In: Niskanen A, Väyrynen J (eds) Economic sustainability of small-scale forestry. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben B, Andrews M (2013) When walking in nature is not restorative—the role of prospect and refuge. Health Place 20:91–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gesler WM (1992) Therapeutic landscapes: medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Soc Sci Med 34(7):735–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gesler WM (1993) Therapeutic landscapes: theory and a case study of Epidaurus Greece. Environ Plan D Soc Space 34(7):735–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Glise K (2014) Exhaustion disorder—identification, characterization and course of illness. Doctoral thesis. The Sahlgrenska Academy and the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg

  • Grahn P, Stigsdotter U (2010) The relationship between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress recovery. Landsc Urban Plan 94:264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen VS, Frivold LH (2008) Public preferences for forest structures: a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban For Urban Green 7:241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T (2004) Restorative environments. In: Spielberger C (ed) Encyclopedia of applied psychology, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Cooper Marcus C (2006) Essay. Healing gardens—places for nature in health care. Lancet 368:36–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Gärling T (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol 23(2):109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KN, Scheurman HL (1977) Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvest and investment under different objectives—discussion and synthesis. For Sci. Monograph 18 (Supplement to For Sci 23(1))

  • Kangas J, Store R, Kangas A (2005) Socioecological landscape planning approach and multicriteria acceptability analysis in multiple-purpose forest management. For Policy Econ 7(4):603–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15:169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpela KM (2003) Negative mood and adult place preference. Environ Behav 35(3):331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morita E, Fukuda S, Nagano J, Hamajima N, Yamamoto H, Iwai I, Nakashima T, Ohira H, Shirakawa T (2007) Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: Shinrin-yoku (forest-air bathing, walking) as a possible method of stress reduction. Public Health 121(1):54–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson K, Sangster M, Konijnendijk CC (2011) Forest, trees and human health and wellbeing: inroduction. In: Nilsson K, Sangster M, Gallis C, Hartig T, de Vries S, Seeland K, Schipperijn J (eds) Forest, trees and human health. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nordh H, Grahn P, Währborg P (2009) Meaningful activities in the forest, a way back from exhaustion and long-term sick leave. Urban For Urban Green 8(3):207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordström E-M, Eriksson LO, Öhman K (2011) Multiple criteria decision analysis with consideration to place-specific values in participatory forest planning. Silva Fenn 45(2):253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman K, Edenius L, Mikusiński G (2011) Optimizing spatial habitat suitability and timber revenue in long-term forest planning. Can J Forest Res 41(3):543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottosson J, Grahn P (2008) The role of natural settings in crisis rehabilitation: how does the level of crisis influence the response to experiences of nature with regard to measures of rehabilitation? Landsc Res 33(1):51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pálsdottír AM, Persson D, Persson B, Grahn P (2014) The journey of recovery and empowerment embraced by nature—clients’ perspectives on nature-based rehabilitation in relation to the role of the natural environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(7):7094–7115

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala T, Kellomäki S, Mustonen E (1988) Prediction of the amenity of a tree stand. Scand J Forest Res 3:533–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala T, Nuutinen T, Kangas J (1995) Integrating scenic and recreational amenities into numerical forest planning. Landsc Urban Plan 32(3):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag-Öström E (2014) Forests for rest. Recovery from exhaustion disorder. Doctoral Dissertation. Umeå University, Umeå

  • Sonntag-Öström E, Nordin M, Slunga Järvholm L, Lundell Y, Brännström R, Dolling A (2011) Can the boreal forest be used for rehabilitation and recovery from stress-related exhaustion? A pilot study. Scand J For Res 26(3):245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag-Öström E, Nordin M, Lundell Y, Dolling A, Wiklund U, Karlsson M, Carlberg B, Slunga Järvholm L (2014) Restorative effects of visits to urban and forest environments in patients with exhaustion disorder. Urban For Urban Green 13(2):344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigsdotter UK, Palsdottir A-M, Burls A, Chermaz A, Ferrini F, Grahn P (2011) Nature-based therapeutic interventions. In: Nilsson K, Sangster M, Gallis C, Hartig T, de Vries S, Seeland K, Schipperijn J (eds) Forests, trees and human health and well-being. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–342

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz J, Grahn P, Skärbäck E, van den Bosch M, Lundell Y, Nordström E-M, Dolling A (under review) Evaluation of restorative qualities in forest stands using available forest stand data. Eur J For Res

  • Store R (2009) Sustainable locating of different forest uses. Land Use Policy 26(3):610–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenngart Ivarsson C, Abramsson K (2006) Nature and health in Sweden. In: Hassink J, van Dijk M (eds) Farming for health. Green-care farming across Europe and the United States of America. Springer, Berlin, pp 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen L, Ojala A, Korpela K, Lanki T, Tsunetsugu Y, Kagawa T (2014) The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: a field experiment. J Environ Psychol 38:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224(4647):420–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umaerus P, Lidestav G, Eriksson LO, Högvall Nordin M (2013) Gendered business activities in family farm forestry: from round wood delivery to health service. Scand J For Res 28(6):596–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velarde MD, Fry G, Tveit M (2007) Health effects of viewing landscapes—landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban For Urban Green 6:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Währborg P, Petersson I, Grahn P (2014) Nature-assisted rehabilitation for reactions to severe stress and/or depression in a rehabilitation garden: long-term follow-up including comparisons with a matched population-based reference cohort. J Rehabil Med 46(3):271–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield S, McMullan C (2005) Healing in places of decline: (re)imagining everyday landscapes in Hamilton Ontario. Health Place 11(4):299–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward Thompson C (2011) Linking landscape and health: the recurring theme. Landsc Urban Plan 99(3–4):187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White M, Smith A, Humphryes K, Pahl S, Snelling D, Depledge M (2010) Blue space: the importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. J Environ Psychol 30(4):482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikström P, Edenius L, Elfving B, Eriksson LO, Lämås T, Sonesson J, Öhman K, Wallerman J, Waller C, Klintebäck F (2011) The Heureka forestry decision support system: an overview. Math Comput For Nat Resour Sci 3(2):87–95

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Forest Society Foundation (Stiftelsen Skogssällskapet) under Grant 1011-78/150-7 and by the Faculty of Forest Sciences at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences as a part of the research program Forest and Health. We thank Karin Öhman, Hampus Holmström and Ljusk Ola Eriksson for Heureka support as well as creative discussions about treatment simulations and the optimization model. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 901 83, Umeå, Sweden

    Eva-Maria Nordström

  2. Department of Forest Ecology and Management, SLU, 901 83, Umeå, Sweden

    Ann Dolling & Ylva Lundell

  3. Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, SLU, P.O. Box 58, 230 53, Alnarp, Sweden

    Erik Skärbäck

  4. Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden

    Jonathan Stoltz

  5. Department of Work Science, Business Economics and Environmental Psychology, SLU, P.O. Box 88, 230 53, Alnarp, Sweden

    Patrik Grahn

Authors
  1. Eva-Maria Nordström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann Dolling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erik Skärbäck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jonathan Stoltz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Patrik Grahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ylva Lundell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva-Maria Nordström.

Additional information

Communicated by Martin Moog.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nordström, EM., Dolling, A., Skärbäck, E. et al. Forests for wood production and stress recovery: trade-offs in long-term forest management planning. Eur J Forest Res 134, 755–767 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-015-0887-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-015-0887-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation