Skip to main content

The effect of thinning on ground spider diversity and microenvironmental factors of a subtropical spruce plantation forest in East Asia

Abstract

Currently, information about the effect of forest management on biodiversity of subtropical plantation forests in Asia is quite limited. In this study, we compared the spider community structures and guild compositions of subtropical Cryptomeria japonica plantation forests receiving different degree of thinning (0, 25 and 50 %) in central Taiwan. The ground spider diversities and environmental variables were sampled/measured once every 3 months for 1 year before thinning and 2 years after thinning. Results showed that before thinning spider compositions did not differ significantly among three plantation forest types. Two years after thinning, spider species and family compositions of three plantation forest types differed significantly. In all three plantation forest types, the spider composition differed from year to year, indicating existence of temporal variations in spider diversity. Ground hunters (increased 200–600 % in thinned forests), sheet web weavers (increased 50–300 % in thinned forests) and space web weavers (decreased 30–50 % in thinned forests) were the major contributors of the observed spider composition differences among plantation forests receiving different treatments. The stands receiving thinning treatments also had higher illumination, litter decomposition rate, temperature and understory vegetation density. Thinning treatments might have changed the structures of understory vegetation and canopy cover and consequently resulted in abundance and diversity changes of these guilds. Moreover, the heterogeneity in understory vegetation recovery rate and temporal variation of spider composition might further generate spider diversity variations in subtropical forests receiving different degree of thinning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMQNOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

  2. Bonte D, Vanhoutte PCL, Thournout IV, Maelfait JP (2003) The importance of habitat productivity, stability and heterogeneity for spider species richness in coastal grey dunes along the North Sea and its implications for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 13:2119–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bultman TL, Uetz GW (1982) Abundance and community structure of forest floor spider following litter manipulation. Oecologia 55:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cardoso P, Silva I, de Oliverira NG, Serrano ARM (2004a) Higher taxa surrogates of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation. Biol Conserv 117:453–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardoso P, Silva I, de Oliverira NG, Serrano ARM (2004b) Indicator taxa of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation. Biol Conserv 120:517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardoso P, Pekár S, Jocqué R, Coddington JA (2011) Global patterns of guild composition and functional diversity of spiders. PLoS One 6:e21710

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Technical Report, PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clough Y, Kruess A, Kleijn D, Tscharntke T (2005) Spider diversity in cereal fields: comparing factors at local, landscape and regional scales. J Biogeogr 32:2007–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DeBell DS, Thomas G, Whitesell CD (1997) Growth, development, and yield in pure and mixed stands of eucalyptus and albizia. For Sci 43:286–298

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fermon H, Waltert M, Larsen TB, Dall’Asta U, Mühlenberg M (2000) Effects of forest management on diversity and abundance of fruit-feeding nymphalid butterflies in south-eastern Côte d’Ivoire. J Insect Conserv 4:173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Finch OD (2005) Evaluation of mature conifer plantations as secondary habitat for epigeic forest arthropods (Coleoptera: Carabidae; Araneae). For Ecol Manage 204:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP (1999) Gap light analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fujimori T (2001) Ecological and silvicultural strategies for sustainable forest management. Elsevier Science, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gurdebeke S, Bakker DD, Vanlanduyt N, Maelfait JP (2003) Plans for a large regional forest in eastern Flanders (Belgium): assessment of spider diversity and community structure in the current forest remnants. Biodivers Conserv 12:1883–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hatley CL, Macmahon JA (1980) Spider community organization: seasonal variation and the role of vegetation architecture. Environ Entomol 9:632–639

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hobbs RJ, Norton DA (1996) Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 4:93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Holst T, Mayer H, Schindler D (2004) Microclimate within beech stands part II: thermal conditions. Eur J For Res 123:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Homyack JA, Harrison DJ, Krohn WB (2005) Long-term effects of precommercial thinning on small mammals in northern Maine. For Ecol Manage 205:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang PS, Tso IM, Lin HC, Lin LK, Lin CP (2011) Effects of thinning on spider diversity of an East Asian subtropical plantation forest. Zool Stud 50:705–717

    Google Scholar 

  20. Igarashi T, Kiyono Y (2008) The potential of hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa [Sieb. Et Zucc.]) endlicher plantation forests for the restoration of the original plant community in Japan. For Ecol Manage 255:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ito S, Nakagawa M, Buckley GP, Nogami K (2003) Species richness in sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in southeastern Kyushu, Japan: the effects of stand type and age on understory trees and shrubs. J For Res 8:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kerr G (1999) The use of silvicultural systems to enhance the biological diversity of plantation forests in Britain. Forestry 72:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper Collins Publishers, New York 620

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lövei GL, Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Ködöböcz V (2006) The influence of matrix and edges on species richness patterns of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in habitat islands. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maeto K, Sato S, Miyata H (2002) Species diversity of longhorn beetles in humid warm-temperate forests: the impact of forest management practices on old-growth forest species in southwestern Japan. Biodivers Conserv 11:1919–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Magura T, Horváth R, Tóthmérész B (2010) Effect of urbanization on ground-dwelling spiders in forest patches, in Hungary. Landsc Ecol 25:621–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maleque MA, Ishii HT, Maeto K, Taniguchi S (2007a) Line thinning enhances diversity of Coleoptera in overstocked Cryptomeria japonica plantations in central Japan. Arthropod Plant Interact 1:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maleque MA, Ishii HT, Maeto K, Taniguchi S (2007b) Line thinning fosters the abundance and diversity of understory Hymenoptera (Insecta) in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations. J For Res 12:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marañón T, Ajbilou R, Ojeda F, Arroyo J (1999) Biodiversity of woody species in oak woodlands of southern Spain and northern Morocco. For Ecol Manag 115:147–156

    Google Scholar 

  30. Marc P, Canard A (1997) Maintaining spider biodiversity in agroecosystems as a tool in pest control. Agric Ecosyst Environ 62:229–235

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marra JL, Edmonds RL (2005) Soil arthropod responses to different patch types in a mixed-conifer forest of the Sierra Nevada. For Sci 51:255–265

    Google Scholar 

  32. Montaña EDL, Rey-Benayas JM, Carrascal LM (2006) Response of bird communities to silvicultural thinning of Mediterranean maquis. J Appl Ecol 43:651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Muff P, Kropf C, Frick H, Nentwig W, Schmidt-Entling MH (2009) Co-existence of divergent communities at natural boundaries: spider (Arachnida: Araneae) diversity across an alpine timberline. Insect Conserv Divers 2:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Niemelä J, Haila Y, Punttila P (1996) The importance of small-scale heterogeneity in boreal forests: variation in diversity in forest-floor invertebrates across the succession gradient. Ecography 19:352–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nyffeler M (2000) Ecological impact of spider predation: a critical assessment of Bristowe’s and Turnbull’s estimates. Bull Br Arachnol Soc 11:367–373

    Google Scholar 

  37. Oheimb GV, Westphal C, Tempel H, Härdtle W (2005) Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica) (Serrahn, North–east Germany). For Ecol Manage 212:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ohsawa M (2004) Species richness of Cerambycidae in larch plantations and natural broad-leaved forests of the central mountainous region of Japan. For Ecol Manage 189:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ohsawa M (2005) Species richness and composition of Curculionidae (Coleoptera) in a conifer plantation, secondary forest, and old-growth forest in the central mountainous region of Japan. Ecol Res 20:632–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ohsawa M (2007) The role of isolated old oak trees in maintaining beetle diversity within larch plantations in the central mountainous region of Japan. For Ecol Manage 250:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ohsawa M, Nagaike T (2006) Influence of forest types and effects of forestry activities on species richness and composition of Chrysomelidae in the central mountainous region of Japan. Biodivers Conserv 15:1179–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Oxbrough AG, Gittings T, O’Halloran J, Giller PS, Smith GF (2005) Structural indicators of spider communities across the forest plantation cycle. For Ecol Manage 212:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pearce JL, Venier LA (2005) The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spider (Araneae) as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: A review. Ecol Ind 6:780–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pearce JL, Venier LA, Eccles G, Pedlar J, McKenney D (2004) Influence of habitat and microhabitat on epigeal spider (Araneae) assemblages in four stand types. Biodivers Conserv 13:1305–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pinkus-Rendón MA, León-Cortés JL, Ibarra-Núñez G (2006) Spider diversity in a tropical habitat gradient in Chiapas, Mexico. Divers Distrib 12:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schmidt MH, Roschewitz I, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2005) Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity and density of ground-dwelling farmland spiders. J Appl Ecol 42:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Son Y, Lee YY, Jun YC, Kim ZS (2004) Light availability and understory vegetation 4 years after thinning in a Larix leptolepis plantation of central Korea. J For Res 9:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Taiwan Forestry Bureau (1995) Third national census on forest resources and land utilization of Taiwan. Bureau of Forestry and Agriculture, Taiwan (in Chinese)

  49. Taki H, Inoue T, Tanaka H, Makihara H, Sueyoshi M, Isono M, Okabe K (2010) Responses of community structure, diversity, and abundance of understory plants and insect assemblages to thinning in plantations. For Ecol Manage 259:607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Thomas SC, Halpern CB, Falk DA, Liguori DA, Austin KA (1999) Plant diversity in managed forests: understory responses to thinning and fertilization. Ecol Appl 9:864–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tsai ZI, Huang PS, Tso IM (2006) Habitat management by aboriginals promotes high spider diversity on an Asian tropical island. Ecography 29:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Uetz GW (1975) Temporal and spatial variation in species diveristy of wandering spider (Araneae) in deciduous forest litter. Environ Entomol 4:719–724

    Google Scholar 

  53. Waltz AEM, Covington WW (2004) Ecological restoration treatments increase butterfly richness and abundance: mechanisms of response. Restor Ecol 12:85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Weng SH, Kuo SR, Guan BT, Chang TY, Hsu HW, Shen CW (2007) Microclimatic responses to different thinning intensities in a Japanese cedar plantations of northern Taiwan. For Ecol Manage 241:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Whitehouse MEA, Shochat E, Shackak M, Lubin Y (2002) The influence of scale and patchiness on spider diversity in a semi-arid environment. Ecography 25:395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wise DH (1993) Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 328

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Wise DH, Snyder WE, Tuntibunpakul P (1999) Spiders in decomposition food webs of agroecosystems: theory and evidence. J Arachnol 27:363–370

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yuan HW, Ding TS, Hsieh HI (2005) Short-term responses of animal communities to thinning in a Cyptomeria japonica (Taxodiaceae) plantation in Taiwan. Zool Stud 44:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zausen GL, Kolb TE, Bailey JD, Wagner MR (2005) Long-term impacts of stand management on ponderosa pine physiology and bark beetle abundance in northern Arizona: a replicated landscape study. For Ecol Manage 218:291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ziesche TM, Roth M (2008) Influence of environmental parameters on the small-scale distribution of soil-dwelling spiders in forests: what makes the difference, tree species or microhabitat? For Ecol Manage 255:738–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by National Science Council, Taiwan grants (NSC 96-2628-B-029-001-MY3; NSC 100-2311-B-029-001-MY3) to I. M. T and Tunghai University Global Research & Education on Environment and Society (GREEnS) project grants to H. C. L. and I. M. T.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Min Tso.

Additional information

Communicated by: Jörg Müller.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 10.

Table 10 Main inhabiting zone, activity period and prey capture strategies of spider guilds (modified from Marc and Canard 1997)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, PS., Lin, HC., Lin, CP. et al. The effect of thinning on ground spider diversity and microenvironmental factors of a subtropical spruce plantation forest in East Asia. Eur J Forest Res 133, 919–930 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0808-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cryptomeria japonica
  • Forest management
  • Araneae
  • Taiwan
  • Thinning