European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 132, Issue 5–6, pp 851–864 | Cite as

Productivity and optimal management of the uneven-aged hardwood forests of Hyrcania

  • Mohmoud Bayat
  • Timo Pukkala
  • Manouchehr Namiranian
  • Mahmoud Zobeiri
Original Paper

Abstract

Hyrcania is a productive region near the southern coast of Caspian Sea. Her forests are mostly uneven-aged beach-dominated hardwood mixtures. There is increasing willingness to treat these forests without clear-felling, following the ideas of continuous cover management. However, lack of growth and yield models have delayed this endeavor, and no instructions for uneven-aged management have been issued so far. This study developed a set of models that enable the simulation of stand development in alternative management schedules. The models were used to optimize stand structure and the way in which various initial stands should be converted to the optimal uneven-aged structure. The model set consists of individual-tree diameter increment model, individual-tree height model, survival model, and a model for ingrowth. The models indicate that the sustainable yield of the forests ranges from 2.2 to 7 mha−1 a−1 in uneven-aged management, depending on species composition. Better ingrowth would substantially enhance productivity. The optimal stand structure for maximum sustained yield has a wide descending diameter distribution, the largest trees of the post-cutting stand being 80–100 cm in dbh. If cuttings are conducted at 30- or 40-year intervals, they should remove 20–40 largest trees per hectare. Despite moderate growth rate, uneven-aged management produces high incomes, 850–1,000 UDS ha−1a−1, because the timber assortments that are obtained from the removed large trees have very high selling prices. Optimal conversion to uneven-aged structure showed that the steady-state stand structure depends on initial stand condition and discount rate when the length of the conversion period is fixed. Discount rates higher than 1 % lead to reduced wood production, heavy cuttings, and low basal areas of the steady-state forest.

Keywords

Individual-tree model Continuous cover forestry Conversion cutting Mixed stands Steady-state forest 

References

  1. Bailey RL, Dell TR (1973) Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. For Sci 19(2):97–104Google Scholar
  2. Bare BB, Opalach D (1987) Optimizing species composition in uneven-aged forest stands. For Sci 33:958–970Google Scholar
  3. Bayer H-G, Schwefel H-P (2002) Evolution strategies. A comprehensive introduction. Nat Comput 1:3–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkhart HE (1990) Status and future of growth and yield models. In: Proc. a Symp. on state-of the art methodology of forest inventory. USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW GTR-263, pp 409–414Google Scholar
  5. Calama R, Barbeito I, Pardos M, del Rio M, Montero G (2008) Adapting a model for even-aged Pinus pinea L. stands to complex multi-aged structures. For Ecol Manage 256:1390–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang SJ (1981) Determination of the optimal growing stock and cutting cycle for an uneven-aged stand. For Sci 27(4):739–744Google Scholar
  7. Chang SJ, Kv Gadow (2010) Application of the generalized Faustmann model to uneven-aged forest management. J For Econ 16(2010):313–325Google Scholar
  8. Eslami AR, Hasani M (2011) The comparison of diameter increment of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) in different regions of the Caspian forests. Food Agric Environ 9(3&4):754–757Google Scholar
  9. Farahmand K (2012) Economic analysis of optimal utilising at Northern forest of Iran. Int J Agri Sci 2(4):374–384Google Scholar
  10. Forest management project of Gorazbon section (2009) University of Tehran’s Kheyrud Experimental Forest in northern Iran. 440pGoogle Scholar
  11. Getz WM, Haight RG (1989) Population harvesting: demographic models for fish, forest and animal resources. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  12. Griess VC, Knoke T (2013) Bioeconomic modelling of mixed Norway spruce—European beech stands: economic consequences of considering ecological effects. Eur J For Res 132(3):511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griess VC, Acevedo R, Härtl F, Staupendahl K, Knoke T (2012) Does mixing tree species enhance stand resistance against natural hazards? A case study for spruce. For Ecol Manage 267:284–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haight RG (1985) A comparison of dynamic and static economic models of uneven-aged stand management. For Sci 31(4):957–974 Google Scholar
  15. Haight RG, Getz WM (1987) Fixed and equilibrium endpoint problems in uneven-aged stand management. For Sci 33:908–931Google Scholar
  16. Haight RG, Brodie JD, Adams DM (1985) Optimizing the sequence of diameter distributions and selection harvests for uneven-aged stand management. For Sci 31(2):451–462Google Scholar
  17. Heshmatol Vaezin SM, Attarod P, Bayramzadeh V (2008) Tree volume increment models of broadleaf species in the uneven-aged mixed Caspian forest. Asian J Plant Sci 7(8):700–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimmins JP (1990) Modeling the sustainability of forest production and yield for a changing and uncertain future. For Chron 66:271–280Google Scholar
  19. Kimmins JP (1997) Forest ecology: a foundation for sustainable management, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p 596Google Scholar
  20. Lähde E, Laiho O, Norokorpi Y (1999) Diversity-oriented silviculture in the Boreal zone of Europe. For Ecol Manage 118:223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liang J, Buongiorno J, Monserud RS (2005) Growth and yield of all-aged Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest stands: a matrix model with stand diversity effects. Can J For Res 35:2369–2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lohmander P (2007) Adaptive optimization of forest management in a stochastic world. In: Weintraib A, Romero C, Bjørndal T, Epstein R, Miranda J (eds) Handbook of operations research in natural resources. International series in operations research and management science, Vol. 99. Springer, p 525–543Google Scholar
  23. Lohmander P, Mohammadi-Limaei S (2008) Optimal continuous cover forest management in an uneven-aged forest in the North of Iran. J Appl Sci 8(11):1995–2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marvie-Mohadjer MR (2012) Silviculture. University of Tehran Press, TehranGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitchie BR (1985) Uneven-aged management and the value of forest land. For Sci 31:116–121Google Scholar
  26. Peng CH (1999) Growth and yield models for uneven-aged stands: past, present and future. For Ecol Manage 132:259–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pretzsch H, Bielak K, Block J, Bruchwald A, Dieler J, Ehrhart HP, Kohnle U, Nagel J, Spellmann H, Zasada M, Zingg A (2013) Productivity of mixed versus pure stands of oak (Quercus pretraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) along an ecological gradient. Eur J For Res. doi:10.1007/s10342-012-0673-y
  28. Pukkala T (2009) Population-based methods in the optimization of stand management. Silva Fenn 43(2):261–274Google Scholar
  29. Pukkala T, Kellomäki S (2012) Anticipatory vs. adaptive optimization of stand management when tree growth and timber prices are stochastic. Forestry 85(4):463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O (2009) Growth and yield models for uneven-sized forest stands in Finland. For Ecol Manage 258:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O (2010) Optimizing the structure and management of uneven-sized stands in Finland. Forestry 83(2):129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O (2012) Continuous cover forestry in Finland—recent research results. In: Pukkala T, von Gadow K (eds) Continuous cover forestry. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 85–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O (2013) Species interactions in the dynamics of even- and uneven-aged boreal forests. J Sust For 32:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rößiger J, Griess VC, Knoke T (2011) May risk aversion lead to near-natural forestry? A simulation study. Forestry 84(5):527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sefidi K, Marvie Mohadjer MR, Mosandl R, Copenheaver CA (2011) Canopy gaps and regeneration in old-growth Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands, northern Iran. For Ecol Manage 262(6):1094–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tahvonen O (2009) Optimal choice between even- and uneven-aged forestry. Nat Res Modelling 22:289–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tahvonen O (2011) Optimal structure and development of uneven-aged Norway spruce forests. Can J For Res 41:2389–2402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tahvonen O, Pukkala T, Laiho O, Lähde E, Niinimäki S (2010) Optimal management of uneven-aged Norway spruce stands. For Ecol Manage 260:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trasobares A, Pukkala T, Miina J (2004) Growth and yield model for uneven-aged mixtures of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus nigra Arn. in Catalonia, north-east Spain. Ann For Sci 6:9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vanclay JK (1994) Modelling forest growth and yield: applications to mixed tropical forests. CAB International, United KingdomGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohmoud Bayat
    • 1
  • Timo Pukkala
    • 2
  • Manouchehr Namiranian
    • 1
  • Mahmoud Zobeiri
    • 1
  1. 1.Natural Resources Faculty, Department of ForestryUniversity of TehranKarajIran
  2. 2.University of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations