Physiological response of irrigated and non-irrigated Norway spruce trees as a consequence of drought in field conditions
- 346 Downloads
Physiological reactions of 25-year-old Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) trees to drought were examined during 2009 vegetation period. During the second half of summer, the decrease in soil water content was observed and irrigation was applied to a group of spruce trees, while the second group was treated under natural soil drought. The response to water deficit was recorded at the level of leaf water potential (ΨL). However, it appears that ΨL plays minor role in early stomata regulation of Norway spruce as CO2 assimilation rate (P N) and stomatal conductance (g S) were reduced already before water potential decrease. Leaf water potential decreased significantly only in case when soil water content was low in the long run and when transpiration losses were simultaneously relatively high. Almost complete stomatal closure even of the irrigated trees was caused by the increase in the vapour pressure deficit of the air (D) above the value of approximately 1.5 kPa. Low values of D were accompanied by partial stomata opening of drought-treated trees. In non-irrigated spruce trees, the values of P N decreased by 35–55% in comparison with irrigated trees. No drought-induced significant changes were found either in chlorophyll and carotenoid concentration (chl a + b, car) or in maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (F v/F m). High rates of sap flow (F) did not always lead to stomatal closure during midday. It appears that high transpiration rates do not control stomatal response to D.
KeywordsPicea abies Water deficit Leaf water potential Transpiration Photosynthesis Stomatal closure Vapour pressure deficit
This publication is the result of the project implementation Extension of the Centre of Excellence “Adaptive Forest Ecosystems”, ITMS: 26220120049, supported by the Research & Development Operational Programme funded by the ERDF. This work was also supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-0022-07.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bolhar-Nordenkampf HR, Haumann J, Lechner EG, Postl WF, Schreier V (1992) Seasonal changes in photochemical capacity, quantum yield, P700-absorbance and carboxylation efficiency in needles from Norway spruce. In: Yamamoto HY, Smith CM (eds) Photosynthetic response to the environment. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Washington, pp 193–200Google Scholar
- Brestič M (2002) Determination of sensitive sites in photosynthesis during longtermplant dehydration. (In Slovak, with English detailed abstract) J Cent Eur Agric 2:217–226Google Scholar
- Brestič M, Cornic G, Fryer MJ, Baker NR (1995) Does photorespiration protect the photosynthetic apparatus in French bean leaves from photoinhibition during drought stress? Planta 196:450–457Google Scholar
- Centritto M, Tognetti R, Leitgeb E, Strelcova K, Cohen S (2011a) Above ground processes: anticipating climate change influences. In: Bredemeier M, Cohen S, Godbold LD, Lode E, Pichler V, Schleppi P (eds) Forest management and the water cycle: an ecosystem-based approach ecological studies. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–64Google Scholar
- FAO (2006) World reference base for soil resources. World soil resources reports 103. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Gartner K, English M, Leitgeb E (2011) Effects of climate change on the vulnerability of Norway spruce stands—soil hydrological constraints for forest management in Austria’s lowlands. In: Bredemeier M, Cohen S, Godbold LD, Lode E, Pichler V, Schleppi P (eds) Forest management and the water cycle: an ecosystem-based approach ecological studies. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 127–140Google Scholar
- Gömöry D, Longauer R, Hlásny T, Pacalaj M, Strmeň S, Krajmerová D (2011) Adaptation to common optimum in different populations of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.). Eur J Forest Res. doi: 10.1007/s10342-011-0512-6
- Jones HG (1998) Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J Exp Bot 49:387–398Google Scholar
- Konôpka B (2009) Differences in fine root traits between Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)—a case study in the Kysucké Beskydy Mts. J For Sci 55:56–566Google Scholar
- Kronfuss G, Polle A, Tausz M, Havranek WM, Weisner G (1998) Effects of ozone and mild drought stress on gas exchange, antioxidants and chloroplast pigments in current-year needles of young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L] Karst.). Trees 12:482–489Google Scholar
- Larcher W (1988) Physiological plant ecology. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
- Máliš J (2007) The interpretation of a tomographic reflection of electrical resistivity in the Javorie massif. (In Slovak, with English abstract). Acta Fac For Zvolen 49:73–83Google Scholar
- Minďáš J, Škvarenina J, Střelcová K, Priwitzer T (2000) Influence of climatic changes of Norway spruce occurrence in the west Carpathians. J For Sci 46:249–259Google Scholar
- Przybylski T (1998) Morphology. In: Tjoelker MG, Boratynski A, Bugala W (eds) Biology and ecology of Norway spruce. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, PoznańGoogle Scholar
- Urban O, Janouš D, Acosta M, Czerný R, Marková I, Navrátil M, Pavelka M, Pokorný R, Šprtová M, Zhang R, Špunda V, Grace J, Marek MV (2007) Ecophysiological controls over the net ecosystem exchange of mountain spruce stand. Comparison of the response in direct vs. diffuse solar radiation. Glob Change Biol 13:157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Woo SY (2009) Forest decline of the world: a linkage with air pollution and global warming. Afr J Biotechnol 8:7409–7414Google Scholar