Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do mature pine plantations resemble deciduous natural forests regarding understory plant diversity and canopy structure in historically modified landscapes?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the structure of the arboreal layer and the diversity and species composition of the understory vegetation of three types of mature forest communities: oak (Quercus pyrenaica) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) forests and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) plantations. Our main aim was to determine whether differences in these variables existed and were due to the identity of the dominant tree species. We selected four stands or replicates per forest type located geographically close and with relatively similar conditions. We found no differences in the arboreal structure of oak and beech forests, which were characterised by great variability in tree size, while in case of plantations, this variability was lower at both the intra-stand (estimated by the coefficient of variation) and inter-stand (i.e. the four replicates harboured trees of similar sizes) scales. However, the highest variability in the canopy layer of natural forests was not consistently linked to greater understory species richness. Indeed, the lowest plant species richness was found in beech forests, while oak forests harboured the highest value at either the sampling unit (per m2) or stand scales. The greatest negative correlation between plant diversity and the environmental variables measured was found for litter depth, which was the highest in beech forests. The results obtained by the CCA indicated that the four replicates of each forest type clustered together, due to the presence of characteristic species. We concluded that pine plantations did not approach the environmental conditions of native forests, as plantations were characterised by singular understory species composition and low arboreal layer variability, compared to natural woodlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibold OW (1995) Ecology of world vegetation. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Augusto L, Dupouey JL, Ranger J (2003) Effects of tree species on understory vegetation and environmental conditions in temperate forests. Ann For Sci 60:823–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P (2008) Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved-A critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 254:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosofske KD, Chen J, Crow TR (2001) Understory vegetation and site factors: implications for a managed Wisconsin landscape. For Ecol Manage 146:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet J, Falkengren-Grerup U, Tyler G (1996) Herb layer vegetation of south Swedish beech and oak forests-effects of management and soil acidity during one decade. For Ecol Manage 88:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant DM, Ducey MJ, Innes JC, Lee TD, Eckert RT, Zarin DJ (2004) Forest community analysis and the point-centered-quarter method. Plant Ecol 175:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2005) Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples v. 7.5 (URL: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates)

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil Trans Royal Soc 345:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa M, Morla C, Sainz H (eds) (1998) Los Bosques Ibéricos. Una Interpretación Geobotánica. Planeta, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam G, Curtis JT (1956) The use of distance method in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal RL (2007) Management strategies to increase stand structural diversity and enhance biodiversity in coastal rainforest of Alaska. Biol Conserv 137:520–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estevan H, Lloret F, Vayreda J, Terradas J (2007) Determinants of woody species richness in Scot pine and beech forests: climate, forest match size and forest structure. Acta Oecol 31:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forteza J, Lorenzo LF, Najac N, Cuadrado S, Ingelmo F, Hernandez J, Garcia P, Prat L, Muñez C, Macarro C, Rivas D (1987) Memoria y mapa de suelos de Castilla y León. Junta de Castilla y León

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gracia M, Montané F, Piqué J, Retana J (2007) Overstory structure and topographic gradients determining diversity and abundance of understory shrub species in temperate forests in central Pyrenees (NE Spain). For Ecol Manage 242:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härdtle W, von Oheimb G, Westphal C (2003) The effects of light and soil conditions on the species richness of the ground vegetation of deciduous forests in northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein). For Ecol Manage 182:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Tecnológico Geominero de España (1995) Atlas del Medio Natural de la Provincia de León. ITGE and Diputación de León, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Valverde A, Hortal J (2003) Las curvas de acumulación de especies y la necesidad de evaluar la calidad de los inventarios biológicos. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología 8:151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Kint V (2005) Structural development in ageing temperate Scots pine stands. For Ecol Manage 214:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kint V, Geudens G, Mohren GMJ, Lust N (2006) Sylvicultural interpretation of natural vegetation dynamics in ageing Scots pine stands for their conversion into mixed broadleaved stands. For Ecol Manage 223:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luis-Calabuig E, Tárrega R, Calvo L, Marcos E, Valbuena L (2000) History of landscape changes in Northwest Spain according to land use and management. In: Trabaud L (ed) Life and environment in the Mediterranean. WIT Press, UK, pp 43–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1989) Diversidad ecológica y su medición. Vedrà, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos JA, Marcos E, Taboada A, Tárrega R (2007) Comparison of community structure and soil characteristics in different aged Pinus sylvestris plantations and a natural pine forest. For Ecol Manage 247:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcos E, Calvo L, Marcos JM, Taboada A, Tárrega R (2010) Tree effects on the chemical topsoil features of oak, beech and pine forests. Eur J Forest Res 129:25–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Medio Ambiente (2002) Plan Forestal Español (2002–2032). Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann M, Starlinger F (2001) The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests. For Ecol Manage 145:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North M, Oakley B, Fiegener R, Gray A, Barbour M (2005) Influence of light and soil moisture on Sierrran mixed-conifer understory communities. Plant Ecol 177:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onaindía M, Dominguez I, Albizu I, Garbisu C, Amezaga I (2004) Vegetation diversity and vertical structure as indicators of forest disturbance. For Ecol Manage 195:341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oria de Rueda JA (2003) Los Bosques de Castilla y León. Ámbito Ediciones, Valladolid

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken GF (1996) Natural woodland ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozas V, Zas R, Solla A (2009) Spatial structure of deciduous forest stands with contrasting human influence in northwest Spain. Eur J Forest Res 128:273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer EJ (2006) Using experimental manipulation to assess the roles of leaf litter in the functioning of forest ecosystems. Biol Rev 81:1–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summers RW, Mavor RA, MacLennan AM, Rebecca GW (1999) The structure of ancient native pinewoods and other woodlands in the Highlands of Scotland. For Ecol Manage 119:231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tárrega R, Calvo L, Marcos E, Taboada A (2006) Forest structure and understory diversity in Quercus pyrenaica communities with different human uses and disturbances. For Ecol Manage 227:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tárrega R, Calvo L, Marcos E, Taboada A (2007) Comparison of understory plant community composition and soil characteristics in Quercus pyrenaica stands with different human uses. For Ecol Manage 241:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF (1991) CANOCO (version 3.12). A FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by/partial/detrended/canonical/correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis. TNO, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges DH, Valentine DH, Moore DM, Walters SM, Webb DA (1964–1980) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Servicio Territorial de Medio Ambiente de la Junta de Castilla y León and several forest guards for collaboration. This study was supported by the C.I.C.Y.T. (Research Project REN 2003-05432/GLO) and by the Junta de Castilla y León (Research Project 2003/25, ref. LE031/03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reyes Tárrega.

Additional information

Communicated by G. Brazaitis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tárrega, R., Calvo, L., Taboada, Á. et al. Do mature pine plantations resemble deciduous natural forests regarding understory plant diversity and canopy structure in historically modified landscapes?. Eur J Forest Res 130, 949–957 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0493-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0493-5

Keywords

Navigation