European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 127, Issue 4, pp 327–336 | Cite as

Surface temperature change of spruce forest as a result of bark beetle attack: remote sensing and GIS approach

  • Martin HaisEmail author
  • Tomáš Kučera
Original Paper


In the 1990s, a bark beetle (Ips typographus [L.]) infection caused the decay of spruce forest (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in the central part of the Šumava Mountains, the Czech Republic, bordering the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany, where the bark beetle infection started in the late 1980s. Some areas were left without human intervention and, consequently, the trees around these areas were removed to stop further bark beetle outbreak. The objective of our study was the assessment of surface temperature (ST) change in spruce forest decayed under bark beetle and following clear-cutting. The change detection of ST is based on the comparison of modelled values and thermal satellite data. For this purpose, Landsat scenes from July 11th, 1987 and July 28th, 2002 were used. The models describe the dependence of ST of living spruce forest on topography. The topography effect is based on the Altitude and Hillshade index, which expresses the influence of Aspect and Slope on the relief illumination. Then the modelled ST values were extrapolated for decayed spruce forest and clear-cut areas. In order to increase model accuracy, the forest edge zones (90 m wide) were removed because of their different energy balance; then explained variability value (R 2) increased from 0.37 to 0.55. The results of comparing modelled values with satellite ST in the decayed spruce forest and clear-cut areas show an average increase of ST by 5.2 and 3.5°C, respectively. The thermal satellite data from 1987 were used for model validation. This showed that the accuracy of ST modelling using topography was sufficient, because the difference between the modelled ST with and without decayed spruce forest and clear-cut areas was at most only 0.4°C.


Surface temperature Landsat Spruce forest Topography 



We are grateful to Dr. Keith Edwards for language improvement. M.H. was supported by the Institutional research project MSM 6007665806. T.K. was supported by the Institutional research project AV0Z60870520.


  1. Ahern FJ, Erdle T, Maclean DA, Kneppeck ID (1991) A quantitative relationship between forest growth rates and Thematic Mapper reflectance measurements. Int J Remote Sens 12(3):387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey RG (1996) Ecosystem geography. Springer, New York Google Scholar
  3. Barry RG (1992) Mountain weather and climate, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker F, Li ZL (1990) Towards a local split window method over land surfaces. Int J Remote Sens 11:369–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosveld FC, Holtslag AAM, Van den Hurk BJJM (1999) Interpretation of crown radiation temperatures of a Dense Douglas fir forest with similarity theory. Bound Layer Meteorol 92:429–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burrough PA, McDonell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell GS (1977) An introduction to environmental biophysics. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell JB (2002) Introduction to remote sensing. The Guildford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell GS, Norman JM (1998) An introduction to environmental biophysics, 2nd edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen WB, Spies TA (1992) Estimating structural attributes of Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest stands from LANDSAT and SPOT imagery. Remote Sens Environ 41:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ESRI, ARC/Info 7 (1994) Environmental systems. Research Institute Inc, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  12. Gates DM (2003) Biophysical ecology. Dover, Mineola, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Geiger R (1965) The climate near the ground. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  14. Geiger R, Aron RH, Todhunter P (2003) The climate near the ground, 6th edn. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Langham Google Scholar
  15. Geomatica Algorithm Reference (2003) PCI Geomatics, 50 West Wilmot Street, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada, L4B 1M5Google Scholar
  16. Hais M (2004) Influence of drainage on landscape functioning in Sumava National Park. In: Hermann A (ed) Extended abstract—international conference on hydrology of mountains environments. Berchtesgaden, Federal Republic of Germany, 27 September–1 October 2004, p 125Google Scholar
  17. Hais M (2006) Changes in land cover temperature and humidity parameters resulting from spruce forests decay in the centre of the Sumava National Park. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica 2:95–105Google Scholar
  18. Hashimoto S, Suzuki M (2004) The impact of forest clear-cutting on soil temperature: a comparison between before and after cutting, and between clear-cut and control sites. J For Res 9:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heurich M, Reinelt A, Fahse L (2001) Die Buchdruckermassenvermehrung im Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald. In: Nationalparkverwaltung Bayerischer Wald: Waldentwicklung im Bergwald nach Windwurf und Borkenkäferbefall. Bayerische Staatsforstverwaltung 9–48Google Scholar
  20. Hojdová M, Hais M, Pokorný J (2005) Microclimate of a peat bog and of the forest in different states of damage in the National Park Šumava. Silva Gabreta 11(1):13–24Google Scholar
  21. Hutchinson MF (1993) Development of a continent-wide DEM with applications to terrain and climate analysis. In: Goodchild MF et al (eds) Environmental modeling with GIS. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 392–399Google Scholar
  22. Jensen JR (2000) Remote sensing of the environment: an earth resource perspective. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonášová M, Prach K (2004) Central-European mountain spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests: regeneration of tree species after a bark beetle outbreak. Ecol Eng 23:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klassen W, van Breugel PB, Moors EJ, Nieveen JP (2002) Increased heat fluxes near a forest edge. Theor Appl Climatol 72:231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2004) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Lookingbill TR, Urban DL (2003) Spatial estimation of air temperature differences for landscape-scale studies in montane environments. Agric For Meteorol 114:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCune B, Keon D (2002) Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. J Veg Sci 13:603–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pierce KB, jun. Lookingbill T, Urban D (2005) A simple method for estimating potential relative radiation (PRR) for landscape-scale vegetation analysis. Landsc Ecol 20:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pokorný J (2001) Dissipation of solar energy in landscape-controlled by management of water and vegetation. Renewable Energy 24:641–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quattrochi DA, Luval JC (2000) Thermal remote sensing in land surface processes. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Richter R (1990) A fast atmospheric correction algorithm applied to LANDSAT TM images. Int J Remote Sens 11(1):159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ripl W (1992) Management of water cycle and energy flow for ecosystem control—the Energy-Transport-Reaction (ETR) model. Ecol Modell 78:61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ripl W, Pokorný J, Eiseltová M, Ridgill S (1994) A holistic approach to the structure and function of wetlands and their degradation. IWRB Publ 32:16–35Google Scholar
  34. Schmid JM (1976) Temperatures, growth, and fall of needles on Engelmann spruce infested by spruce beetles. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note RM-331, 4 p. Rocky Mt. For. and Range Exp. Stn., Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  35. Schulze ED, Beck E, Müller-Hohenstejn K (2005) Plant ecology. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin D, Lee K (2005) Use of remote sensing and geographical information systems to estimate green space surface-temperature change as a result of urban expansion. Landsc Ecol Eng 1:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siitonen J, Martikainen P, Punttila P, Rauh J (2000) Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecol Manage 128(3):211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skuhravý V (2002) Lýkožrout smrkový (Ips typographus L.) a jeho kalamity. Der Buchdrucker und seine Kalamitäten. Agrospoj, Praha (in czech)Google Scholar
  39. Strnad E (2003) Climate of Šumava. In: Šumava, nature, history, life (in czech), pp 35–44Google Scholar
  40. Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ 8:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waring RH, Running SW (1998) Forest ecosystems: concept and management. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  42. Weber FP (1971) The use of airborne spectrometers and multispectral scanners for previsual detection of ponderosa pine trees under stress from insects and disease In: Monit. for. Iand from high aft. and from space. Annul rep. to Earth Resour. Surv. Prog., Off. Space Sci. and Appl. NASA, Houston, TX, pp 94–104Google Scholar
  43. Yoshino MM (1975) Climate in a small area. An introduction to local meteorology. University of Tokyo Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  44. Zielonka T, Piatek G (2004) The herb and dwarf shrubs colonization of decaying logs in subalpine forest in the Polish Tatra Mountains. Plant Ecol 172(1):63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Ecology LaboratoryUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Systems Biology and Ecology, ASCRČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations