Skip to main content
Log in

Quality Response of Minimally Processed ‘Alphonse Lavallée’ Table Grapes During Cold Storage as Influenced by Preharvest Sustained Deficit Irrigation and Postharvest UV-C Irradiation

Einfluss von defizitärer Wasserversorgung vor der Ernte und UV-C-Bestrahlung nach der Ernte auf die Qualität von Tafeltrauben der Sorte ‘Alphonse Lavallée‘ während der Kühllagerung

  • Original Article / Originalbeitrag
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The postharvest life of table grape is restricted by quality deterioration from harvest to retail, mainly due to water loss, accelerated berry softening, pathogen attract and senescence. Preharvest cultivation practices, as well as postharvest treatments, are effective on postharvest life of the grape. Remarkable part of the grapevines experience seasonal or long term drought stress across the world. Therefore, the present study was conducted to reveal the quality response of stem detached berries of ‘Alphonse Lavallée’ table grapes during cold storage as influenced by preharvest sustained deficit irrigation (DI) and postharvest UV‑C irradiation as non-chemical disinfection method. The soilless grown experimental grapevines in protected cultivation were divided into two lines as full irrigation (maintaining the substrate water holding capacity at 100%) and DI (fifty percent of FI) sustained during the vegetation in glasshouse. The representative berries from each irrigation practices were stored with or without UV‑C postharvest irradiation at 1 ± 0.5 °C, 80–90% RH during 21 d. Berry visual quality did not change up to the 14th d of storage across the grapes, while the berries underwent noticeable decreases in visual quality after the 14th d, except for FI plus UV‑C treatments. UV‑C helped to maintain the moisture content and skin rupture force of the stemless berries during the storage. Color, SSC, acidity and pH values of the stored berries did not display considerable response to UV‑C. In certain cases, antioxidant and total phenol were considerably higher in the must of the berries subjected to UV‑C. Overall, postharvest UV‑C irradiation retained the loss in physical and biochemical properties of minimally processed table grape and thus it would be recommadable for both DI and FI grapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott JA (1999) Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol Technol 15:207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allende A, Marín B, Buendía B, Tomás-Barberán F, Gil MI (2007) Impact of combined postharvest treatments (UV‑C light gaseous O3, superatmospheric O2 and high CO2) on bioactive constituents and shelf-life of strawberries. Postharvest Biol Technol 46:201–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC (1984) Official methods of analysis, 4th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, pp 414–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzie IFF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”, the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239:70–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cadiz-Gurrea MD, Borras-Linares I, Lozano-Sanchez J, Joven J, Fernandez-Arroyo S, Segura-Carretero A (2017) Cocoa and grape seed by products as a source of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory proanthocyanidins. Int J Mol Sci 18:376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020376

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cagnasso E, Caudana A, Rolle L, Gerbi V (2005) Profili di maturazione e scelta di vinificazione per la valorizzazione varietale. Inf Agrar Suppl 1–14:23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves M, Zarrouk O, Francisco R, Costa JM, Santos T, Regalado AP, Rodrigues ML, Lopes CM (2010) Grapevine under deficit irrigation: Hints from physiological and molecular data. Ann Bot 105:661–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cia P, Benato EA, Valentini SRT, Anjos VDA, Ponzo FS, Sanches J, Terra MM (2009) Ultraviolet radiation (UV-C) on the postharvest control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in ‘Niagara Rosada’ grapes. Bragantia 68:1009–1015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton PM (2004) Effect of grape seed extract and quercetin on cardiovascular and endothelial parameters in high-risk subjects. J Biomed Biotechnol 5:272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidelibus MW, Cathline KA, Burns J (2007) Potential abscission agents for raisin, table, and wine grapes. HortScience 42:1626–1630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo V, Mastrorilli P, Cafagna I, Nitti GI, Latronico M, Longobardi F, Minoja AP, Napoli C, Romito VA, Schäfer H, Schütz B, Spraul M (2014) Effects of agronomical practices on chemical composition of table grapes evaluated by NMR spectroscopy. J Food Compos Analys 35:44–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu L, Kelm M, Hammerstone J, Beecher G, Holde J, Haytowitz D, Gebhardt S, Prior R (2004) Concentrations of proanthocyanidins in common foods and estimations of normal consumption. J Nutr 134:613–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hui YH, Nip WK, Nollet LML, Paliyath G, Simpson BK (2006) Food biochemistry and food processing. Blackwell, Ames

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iannone M, Mare R, Paolino D, Gagliardi A, Froiio F, Cosco D, Fresta M (2017) Characterization and in vitro anticancer properties of chitosan-microencapsulated flavan-3-ols-rich grape seed extracts. Int J Biol Macromol 104:1039–1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imlak M, Randhawa MA, Hassan A, Ahmad N, Nadeem M (2017) Postharvest shelf life extension and nutritional profile of Thompson Seedless table grapes under calcium chloride and modified atmospheric storage. J Food Process Technol 8:648. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7110.1000648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jang M, Cai L, Udeani GO, Slowing KV, Thomas CF, Beecher CW, Fong HH, Farnsworth NR, Kinghorn AD, Mehta RG, Moon RC, Pezzuto JM (1997) Cancer chemopreventive activity of resveratrol, a natural product derived from grapes. Science 275:218–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kader AA (2002) Postharvest biology and technology: an overview. In: Kader AA (ed) Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. Publication 3311. University of California and Agricultural and Natural Resources, Berkeley, pp 145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevers C, Falkowski M, Tabart J, Defraigne JO, Dommes J, Pincemail J (2007) Evolution of antioxidant capacity during storage of selected fruits and vegetables. J Agric Food Chem 55:8596–8603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kou L, Lou Y, Liu X (2007) Effects of mild heat treatment on microbial growth and product quality of packaged fresh-cut table grapes. J Food Sci 72:567–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang A, During H (1990) Grape berry splitting and some mechanical properties of the skin. Vitis 29:61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CY, Bourne MC (1980) Changes in grape firmness during maturation. J Texture Stud 11:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovisolo C, Hartung W, Schubert A (2002) Whole-plant hydraulic conductance and root-to-shoot flow of abscisic acid are independently affected by water stress in grapevines. Funct Plant Biol 29:1349–1356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma C, Fu Z, Xu M, Trebar M, Zhang X (2016) Evaluation on home storage performance of table grape based on sensory quality and consumers’ satisfaction. J Food Sci Technol 53:1363–1370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire R (1992) Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 27:1254–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myburgh PA, van der Walt LD (2005) Cane water content and yield responses of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultanina to overhead irrigation during the dormant period. S Afr J Enol Vitic 26:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • del Nobile MA, Conte A, Scrocco C, Brescia I, Speranza B, Sinigaglia M, Perniola R, Antonacci D (2009) A study on quality loss of minimally processed grapes as affected by film packaging. Postharvest Biol Technol 51:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A (2016) Physiological and morphological responses of grapevine (V. vinifera L. cv. ‘Italiaʼ) leaf to water deficit under different rootstock effects. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus 15:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A, Sari G (2019) Zinc pulverization alleviates the adverse effect of water deficit on plant growth, yield and nutrient acquisition in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.). Sci Hortic 244:61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabir FK, Sabir A (2013) Quality response of table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) during cold storage to postharvest cap stem excision and hot water treatments. Int J Food Sci Technol 48:999–1006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabir FK, Sabir A (2017) Postharvest quality maintenance of table grapes cv. ‘Alphonse Lavallée’ by exogenous applications of salicylic acid, oxalic acid and MAP. Erwerbs-Obstbau 59:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabir FK, Sabir A (2019) Pre-harvest micronized calcium and postharvest uv‑c treatments extend the quality of ‘Crimson Seedless’ (Vitis vinifera L.) grapes. Erwerbs-Obstbau 61(Suppl 1):S25–S32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A, Sabir FK, Kara Z (2011) Effects of modified atmosphere packing and honey dip treatments on quality maintenance of minimally processed grape cv. Razaki (V. vinifera L.) during cold storage. J Food Sci Technol 48:312–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satisha J, Prakash GS, Venugopalan R (2006) Modeling of the effect of physio-biochemical parameters in water use efficiency of grape varieties, rootstocks and their stionic combinations under moisture stress conditions. Turk J Agric For 30:261–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selma MV, Freitas PM, Almela L, González-Barrio R, Espín JC, Suslow T, Tomás-Barberán F, Gil MI (2008) Ultraviolet‑C and induced stilbenes control ochratoxigenic aspergillus in grapes. J Agric Food Chem 56:9990–9996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM (1999) Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol 299:152–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thaipong K, Boonprakob U, Crosby K, Byrne DH (2006) Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, RAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava extracts. J Food Compos Anal 19:669–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaisman N, Niv E (2015) Daily Consumption of red grape cell powder in a dietary dose improves cardiovascular parameters: A. double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Int J Food Sci Nutr 66:342–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wills R, Mcglasson B, Graham D, Joyce D (1998) Postharvest; an introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit, vegetable and ornamentals, 4th edn. UNSW Press, Sydney, p 262

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S, Moffat M (2010) Using a Delphi survey to identify priorities. Br J Health Manag 16:284–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Young MH, Sisson JB (2002) Tensiometery. In: Dane JH, Topp CG (eds) Methods of soil analysis: part: 4 physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 575–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobeidi T, Yazdanpanah M, Bakhshi A (2020) Climate change risk perception among agriculture students: the role of knowledge, environmental attitude, and belief in happening. J Agr Sci Technol 22:43–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Sabir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

F. Sabir, A. Sabir and S. Unal declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabir, F., Sabir, A. & Unal, S. Quality Response of Minimally Processed ‘Alphonse Lavallée’ Table Grapes During Cold Storage as Influenced by Preharvest Sustained Deficit Irrigation and Postharvest UV-C Irradiation. Erwerbs-Obstbau 63 (Suppl 1), 141–148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00592-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00592-4

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation