The Effect of Microelements on Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics of Vitis vinifera cv. Thompson Seedless
- 30 Downloads
Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) are widely cultivated in Iran. One of the major problems involved in cultivating and exploiting this fruit crop is the deficiency of some nutrient elements including microelements. In general, due to the problems facing most of Iran’s soils such as lime and high pH, and the inability of these soils to absorb microelements, especially iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and manganese (Mn), foliar application of fertilizers has a significant effect on the quantitative and qualitative traits of grapevine. In addition, leaf spraying due to the high absorption of the elements by the vine can dramatically decrease fertilizer uses and increase the economic efficiency of the berries. It should not be forgotten that the foliar application of nutrient elements also solves the problems associated with the entry of elements into the groundwater and reduces significantly the environmental impact of soil application of fertilizers. Therefore, to solve this problem, the present study was conducted to investigate the effect of foliar application of micronutrients including Fe, Zn, and Mn on qualitative and quantitative characteristics of grapevine cv. Thompson Seedless. The experiment was conducted with four concentrations of Fe, Zn, and Mn combination (0.00, 2000, 3000, and 5000 mg/L) with three replications on vines at two times including before flowering (May) and after flowering (June). The results showed that the highest values for bunch length, number of berries, berry length, and total soluble solids were related to June application, and the highest values for bunch width, bunch weight, berry width, and berry weight were observed in May. Therefore, foliar application of microelements to save time and cost is recommended before flowering (in May).
KeywordsFoliar application Microelements Yield Vitis vinifera L.
Der Einfluss von Spurenelementen auf qualitative und quantitative Eigenschaften von Vitis vinifera ‘Thompson Seedless’
SchlüsselwörterBlattapplikation Spurenelemente Ertrag Vitis vinifera L.
Conflict of interest
A. Hosseinabad and A. Khadivi declare that they have no competing interests.
- Abdel-Razek E, Aml RM, Abdel-Hamed N (2015) Effect of chelated Fe, zn and mn soil application with spraying GA3 and ascorbic acid on growth, yield and fruit quality of flame seedless grapevines under calcareous soil conditions. Int J Chem Tech Res 8:44–451Google Scholar
- Agev NA (1985) Effects of boron on grapevines yield and quality. Hort Abs 54:2Google Scholar
- Ashoori M, Lolaei A, Ershadi A, Kalhor M, Rasoli A (2013) Effects of N, Fe and zn nutrition on vegetative and reproductive growth and fruit quality of grapevine (Vitis viniferea L.). JOP 3(1):49–58Google Scholar
- Crespean G, Zenarola G, Colugnati F, Bregant F, Gallas F, Tonetti I (2000) Fertilizer procedures and response of vines, preliminary results of an investigation in cabernet sauvignon. J Notiziaro ERSA 13:21Google Scholar
- Daulta BS, Kumar R, Ahlawat VP (1983) A note on the effect of micronutrients spray on quality of Beauty Seedless grapes. Haryana J Hortic Sci 12(3–4):198–199Google Scholar
- Ghaderi N, Vezvaei A, Talaei AR, Babalar M (2003) Effect of boron ans zinc foliar spraying as well as concentrations of these elements on some leaf and fruit characteristics of almond. Iran J Agric Sci 34:127–135Google Scholar
- IPGRI (1997) Descriptors for grapevine (Vitis spp.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Karami MJ (2009) Evaluation of major characteristics of irrigated grape cultivars of Kurdistan province. Seed Plant Improv J 25(1):1–31 (in Farsi)Google Scholar
- Khadivi A (2011) Pomology. Agriculture Education Press, TehranGoogle Scholar
- Lolaei A, Rezaei MA, Khoram Rad M, Kaviani B (2012) Effect of paclobutrazol and sulfate Zinc on vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa). Indian J Annu Biol Res 23:185–191Google Scholar
- Mass JL (1984) Compendium of strawberry diseases. American phytopathological society, St. Paul, pp 15–18Google Scholar
- May P (2004) Flowering and fruit set in grapevines. Lythrum Press, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
- McGovern PE (2003) Ancient wine: the search for the origins of viticulture. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 123Google Scholar
- Morshedi A (2001) Effects of nitrogen, boron and zinc spray on grapevine fruit set. In: Proceedings of the 7th Iranian Soil Science Congress Tehran, Iran, pp 494–495 (in Farsi)Google Scholar
- Moustafa AA, Elshazly SA, Eissa AM, Zahran MA (1986) Effect of foliar applications of chelated Fe, Zn and Mn on leaf mineral content, yield and fruit quality of Roumi Red grape-vines. J Ann Agric Sci 31:623–635Google Scholar
- Nejatian MA (2006) Collection and preliminary evaluation of grapevine cultivars of Qazvin province. Seed Plant 22:319–338 (in Farsi)Google Scholar
- Rohozinski J, Edwards GR, Hoskyns P (1986) Effect of brief exposure to nitrogenous compounds on floral initiation in apple trees. Physiol V6g(24):673–677Google Scholar
- Sachs RM (1977) Nutrient diversion: A hypothesis to explain the chemical control of flowering. J Hortic Sci 12:291–295Google Scholar
- Singh B, Rethy P (1996) Response of varying concentration of boron in yield and quality of grapes (Vitis vinifera). Sci Hortic 5:115–124Google Scholar
- Strrakhov VG (1988) Trace element fertilizer application in vineyards. Vliyanie udobrrenii Na omen veschstvi produktivnost. Rastenii 23:62–65Google Scholar
- Xiao WZ, Lena QM, Rong-Liang Q, Ye-Tao T (2010) Effects of Zn on plant tolerance and non-protein thiol accumulation in Zn hyper accumulator Arabis paniculata Franch. J Environ Exp Bot 70:23–34Google Scholar
- Yamdagni R, Singh D, Jindal PC (1979) A note on effect of zinc sprays on yield and quality of Thompson seedless grapes. Indian J Agric Res 13:117–118Google Scholar
- Zhou T (2003) The characters and effect of potassium in the aeolian sand soil on growth and quality of wine-grapes in Ningxia. J Agric Sci China 2(12):1345–1350Google Scholar