Advertisement

Erwerbs-Obstbau

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 23–27 | Cite as

Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on Sex Expression and Flower Development in Pomegranates

  • Hakan Engin
  • Zeliha GökbayrakEmail author
Original Article
  • 212 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of external treatments with gibberellin, brassinosteroid and auxin on sexual determination and flower development in pomegranate (Punica granatum L. cv. Çekirdeksiz) were investigated. Eigth treatments with three growth regulators, viz., epibrassinolide at 0.01 and 0.1 ppm, homobrassinolide at 0.01 and 0.1 ppm, GA3 at 10 and 25 ppm, NAA at 5 and 15 ppm and control (water spray) were sprayed at the time of initiation of new sprouts. Effects of the plant growth regulators on the percent of the flowers types were not clear. Plants produced considerably more male flowers. Although no statistical importance was detected, it was clear that all growth regulators decreased bisexual flowers and increased male flowers. There were no significant effects of growth regulators on the formation of bisexual flowers at different positions in the plants. The percentage of single bisexual flower was significantly higher than terminal or lateral bisexual flower in a cluster in the control plants. Effects of the plant growth regulators on the size of the parts of the bisexual pistils were, however, found important. The smallest ovaries were obtained from 0.1 ppm HBr, base to sepal notch was the only characteristic which was not influenced by the treatments and stayed between 15 and 18 mm. Total pistil length of the bisexual flowers was greatest with EBr applications and the shortest with the HBr treatments (about 27.5 mm). Length of the style and stigma was mostly shorter, but 0.1 ppm EBr boosted it up comparably more than the rest of the applications including the control. Stigma, on the other hand, was widest in the control flowers, closely followed by all except 0.1 ppm EBr application.

Keywords

Punica granatum Flower Brassinosteroid Gibberellic acid NAA 

Einfluss von Wachstumsregulatoren auf Geschlechtsausprägung und Blütenentwicklung bei Granatapfel

Schlüsselwörter

Granatapfel (Punica granatum) Blüte Brassinosteroide Gibberellinsäure NAA 

Notes

Conflict of interest

H. Engin and Z. Gökbayrak declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Abubakar AR, Ashraf N, Ashraf M (2012) Effect of plant biostimulants on flowering, fruit drop, yield, and return bloom of pomegranate cv. Kandhari Kabuli. Asian J Hortic 7(2):473–477Google Scholar
  2. Ahire GZ, Desai UT, Chaudhari SW, Masalkar SD (1993) Crop regulation in pomegranate: 1. Effect of growth regulators on flower induction, sex and flower drop. Ann Arid Zone 32(2):97–98Google Scholar
  3. Anawal VV, Narayanaswamy P, Kumar HS (2015) Effects of plant growth regulators on induction of flowering in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. Int J Sci Res 4(12):7–9Google Scholar
  4. Arteca RN, Tsai DS, Schlagnhaufer C, Mandava NB (1983) The effect of brassinosteroid on auxin-induced ethylene production by etiolated mung bean segments. Physiol Plant 59:539–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaudhari SM, Desai UT (1993) Effects of plant growth regulators on flower sex in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Indian J Agric Sci 63:34–35Google Scholar
  6. Engin H, Gökbayrak Z (2017) Flower biology of some Turkish pomegranates. Vocarstwo- Journal of Pomology 51(197–198): 47–52.Google Scholar
  7. Freeman DC, Harper KT, Charnov EL (1980) Sex change in plants: old and new observations and new hypotheses. Oecologia 47:222–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goswami JD, Patel NM, Bhadauria HS, Wankhade VR (2013) Effect of plant growth regulators on quality traits of pomegranate cv. Sindur. Asian J Hortic 8(1):361–363Google Scholar
  9. Khryanin VN (2002) Role of phytohormones in sex differentiation in plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 49:545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Manzano S, Martinez C, Megias Z, Gomez P, Garrido D (2011) The role of ethylene and brassinosteroids in the control of sex expression and flower development in Cucurbita pepo. Plant Growth Regul 65:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mars M (2000) Pomegranate plant material: genetic resources and breeding, a review. Options Mediterraneennes Serie A 42, pp 55–62Google Scholar
  12. Papadopoulou E, Little HA, Hammar SA, Grumet R (2005) Effect of modified endogenous ethylene production on sex expression bisexual flower development and fruit production in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Sex Plant Reprod 18:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vardhini BV, Rao SSR (2002) Acceleration of ripening of tomato pericarp discs by brassinosteroids. Phytochemistry 61:843–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wetzstein HY, Ravid N, Wilkins E, Martinelli AP (2011) A morphological and histological characterization of bisexual and male flower types in pomegranate. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 136(2):83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Woeste KE, Ye C, Kieber JJ (1999) Two Arabidopsis mutants that overproduce ethylene are affected in the posttranscriptional regulation of 1‑aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase. Plant Physiol 119:521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yılmaz C (2007) Nar. Hasad Yayıncılık, İstanbul, p 190 (in Turkish)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Horticulture, Faculty of AgricultureCanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityCanakkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations