Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Grape Growth, Anthocyanin and Phenolic Compounds Content of Early Ripening Cv. Cardinal Table Grape (V. vinifera L.) as Affected by Various Doses of Foliar Biostimulant Applications with Gibberellic Acid

Traubenwachstum, Anthocyan- und Phenolgehalt bei der früh reifenden Tafeltraubensorte (V. vinifera L.) ‘Cardinal’ in Abhängigkeit von der Blattspritzung unterschiedlicher Konzentrationen von Gibberellinsäure als Biostimulator

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uneven skin coloration of early ripening table grapes is characterized by a lack of coloring berries within a cluster and the failure of some berries to develop color even with an uncertain delay of harvest. Biostimulants and plant growth regulators are known to have considerable roles on skin color development in the course of grape maturation. This study was carried out to compare the effects of different biostimulant doses, including 0, 1000, 2000 and 4000 ppm (BSt 0, BSt 1, BSt 2 and BSt 4, respectively) with or without gibberellic acid (GA3; 20 ppm) on grape characteristics and chemical composition of early ripening cv. Cardinal grape. Study results of cv. Cardinal grape revealed that alone effects of biostimulant doses had more effective on grape characteristics, total anthocyanin content and total phenolic compounds content from phytochemical characteristics. Although different foliar spray applications had varying effects on physical and chemical parameters; BSt 2 application had especially more superior effects on grape growth and phytochemical characteristics of cv. Cardinal grape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Celik S (2011) Bağcılık (Ampeloloji), 3rd edn. vol I. Avcı Ofset, Istanbul, p 428

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen LP (2000) Raisin production manual. University of California, Los Angeles, p 295

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanoock JF (2008) Temperate fruit crop breeding: germplasm to genomics. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, p 454

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Liu Y, Cao W, Hua M, Xu B, Huang B (2005) Effects of salicylic acid on heat tolerance associated with antioxidant metabolism in Kentucky blue grass. Crop Sci 45:988–955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann M (1991) Elektrochemische Merkmale zur Differenzierung von Lebensmitteln. In: Meier-Ploeger A, Vogtmann H (eds) Lebensmittelqualitat – Ganzheitliche Methoden und Konzepte – Alternative Konzepte, vol 66. CF Müller, Karlsruhe, pp 67–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwatani SI, Yakushiji H, Mitani N, Sakurai N (2011) Evaluation of grape flesh texture by an acoustic vibration method. Postharvest Biol Technol 62:305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardin PD (2015) Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci Hortic 196:3–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamiloglu O (2011) Influence of some cultural practices on yield, fruit quality and individual anthocyanins of table grape cv. Horoz Karasi. J Anim Plant Sci 21:240–245

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kara Z, Akay A, Ateş F, Yağmur B (2008) The P‑value as A tool for quality measurements in grape industry. 31. World Congress of Vine and Wine, 6. General Assembly of the O.I. V., Growing Techniques. Sustainability and Specificity of Production, Verona, 15–20 June 2008 ,

  • Kara Z, Ateş F, Sabir A (2012) Some quality parameters investigated in Sultani Çekirdeksiz (Vitis vinifera L.) clones during ripening period. 47th Croatian and 7th International symposium on Agriculture, Opatija-Croatia, 13–17 February 2012 (Hrvatska)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok D (2011) Influences of pre- and post-verasion cluster thinning treatments on grape composition variables and monoterpene levels of Vitis vinifera L. Cv. Sauvignon Blanc. J Food Agric Environ 9(1):22–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kok D (2016a) Effects of foliar seaweed and humic acid treatments on monoterpene profile and biochemical properties of cv. Riesling berry (V. vinifera L.) throughout the maturation period. J Tekirdag Agric Fac 13(2):67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok D (2016b) Variation in total phenolic compounds, anthocyanin and monoterpene content of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ table grape variety (V. vinifera L.) as affected by cluster thinning and early and late period basal leaf removal treatments. Erwerb Obstbau 58(4):241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok D, Bal E (2016) Seedless berry growth and bioactive compounds of cv. ‘Recel Uzümü’ (V. vinifera L.) as affected by application doses and times of pre-harvest Thidiazuron. Erwerb Obstbau 58(4):253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok D, Bal E (2017) Electrochemical properties and biochemical composition of cv. Shiraz wine grape (V. vinifera L.) depending on various dose and application time of foliar microbial fertilizer treatment. Erwerb Obstbau. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0319-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok D, Bal E, Celik S (2013) Influences of various canopy management techniques on wine grape quality of V. vinifera L. cv. Kalecik Karası. Blg J Agric Sci 19(6):1247–1252

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo JC, Saayman D (1990) Optimum harvesting stage for Sultanina as table grape. Decid Fruit Grow 40(3):101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Pan Q, Cui X, Duan C (2010) Optimization on anthocyanins extraction from wine grape skins using orthogonal test design. Food Sci Biotechnol 19:1047–1053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Looney NE (1993) Improving fruit size, appearance and other aspects of fruit crop quality with plant bioregulating chemicals. Acta Hortic 329:120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majo DD, Giammanco M, Guardia ML, Tripoli E, Giammanco S, Finotti E (2005) Flavanones in citrus fruit: Structure-antioxidant activity relationships. Food Res Int 38:1161–1166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz I, Beno Moualem D, Kaplunov T, Lewinsohn E, Lichter A (2016) Uneven distribution of flavour components in table grape berries. Aust J Grape Wine Res 22:343–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauchi-Mani B, Metraux J (1998) Salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance to pathogen attack. Ann Bot 82:535–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Robredo P, Robledo P, Manriquez D, Molina R (2011) Characterization of sugar and organic acids in commercial varieties of table grapes. Chilean J Agric Res 71(3):452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou N, Zioziou E, Stavrakas D, Patakas A (2003) Effects of ethephon, methanol and girdling treatments on berry maturity and colour development in Cardinal table grapes. Aust J Grape Wine Res 9:12–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parpinello GP, Versari A, Chinnici F, Galassi S (2009) Relationships among sensory descriptors, consumer preference and color parameters of Italian Novello red wines. Food Res Int 42:1389–1395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parrado J, Bautista J, Romero EJ, Garcia Martinez AM, Friaza V, Tejada M (2008) Production of a carob enzymatic extract: Potential use as a biofertilizer. Bioresour Technol 99:2312–2318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock B, Beede B (2004) Improving maturity of Thompson seedless for raisin production. Grape Notes – University of California Cooperative Extension 1(2):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu PC, Singaram P (2001) Effect of micronutrients on growth and yield of grapes cv Muscat. Madras Agric J 88:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton VL, Timberlake CF, Kea L (1978) The phenolic cinnamates of white grapes and wine. J Sci Food Agric 29:403–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano R, Cravero MC (1991) Metodi per lo studio deipolifenolidell’uva. Riv Vitic Enol 2:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Strydom J (2014) The effect of foliar potassium and seaweed products in combination with a leonardite fertigation product on Flame Seedless grape quality. S Afr J Enol Vitic 35(2):283–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Xiao YY (2013) Grape phytochemicals and associated health benefits. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53(11):1202–1225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Martinson TE, Liu RH (2009) Phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activities of wine grapes. Food Chem 116(1):332–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zabadal TJ, Bukovac MJ (2006) Effect of CPPU on fruit development of selected seedless and seeded grape cultivars. HortScience 41(1):154–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zoffoli JP, Latorre BA, Naranjo P (2009) Preharvest application of growth regulators and their effect on postharvest quality of table grapes during cold storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 51:183–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Faculty, Department of Horticulture, Namık Kemal University, 59030, Tekirdağ, Turkey

    Demir Kok

Authors
  1. Demir Kok
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demir Kok.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

D. Kok declares that he has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kok, D. Grape Growth, Anthocyanin and Phenolic Compounds Content of Early Ripening Cv. Cardinal Table Grape (V. vinifera L.) as Affected by Various Doses of Foliar Biostimulant Applications with Gibberellic Acid. Erwerbs-Obstbau 60, 253–259 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-018-0366-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-018-0366-x

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter