Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of neonicotinoid seed treatment on maize anti-herbivore defenses vary across plant genotypes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neonicotinoid seed treatment (NST) is a routine practice used worldwide to control insect pests in a variety of crops, including maize (Zea mays mays L.). However, previous work indicates that systemic insecticides can compromise plant defenses, counteracting efforts to control insect pests. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of thiamethoxam-neonicotinoid seed treatment on the resistance of two maize genotypes (B73 and MC 4050) against the major non-target pest, fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). In preference and performance assays, we evaluated the effect of NST on fall armyworm behavior and biology. We also determined the influence of NST on induced plant defenses, quantifying phytohormone levels and plant volatile emissions, in treatments with and without fall armyworm herbivory. NST did not affect caterpillar host preference, however it reduced caterpillar performance on the genotype B73 across both maize growth stages (V4 and V6). NST-treated B73 plants also had lower induced volatile production (V4 stage) compared to untreated herbivore-damage plants and lower constitutive salicylic acid (V6 stage). In contrast, MC 4050 was not affected by the insecticide, regardless of growth stage. In conclusion, we found that the effects of NST on maize defenses vary by plant genotype and growth stage, suggesting growers may need to tailor their selection of plant genotypes to avoid negative impacts of NST on plant resistance and ultimately pest control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Michael V. Kolomiets for providing maize seeds; Dr. Julio Bernal to allow us to use his laboratory space; and Dr. David Kerns and Jose Santiago for providing NST.

Funding

AFL has received research support by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (process number141499/2017–6) and CAPES-PrInt (process number 88887.371133/2019–00). MFGVP and GAC are supported by CNPq (grant 317453/2021–1 and grant 311701/2021–3, respectively), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Fernanda G. V. Peñaflor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

This study does not involve human participants or vertebrates, and it did not require ethical approval of the local Ethics Committee.

Additional information

Communicated by Peng Han.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 942 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 860 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lima, A.F., Aguirre, N.M., Carvalho, G.A. et al. Effects of neonicotinoid seed treatment on maize anti-herbivore defenses vary across plant genotypes. J Pest Sci 97, 199–212 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-023-01641-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-023-01641-5

Keywords

Navigation