Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biological control at work: demonstrating the complementary effects of natural enemies on two contrasting pests and the damage they cause

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural pest control is a significant service supporting agricultural production. However, the relative contribution of several functional groups of natural enemies to natural pest control is unknown for many crop-pest systems. Furthermore, the output of this regulation in terms of damage reduction is rarely assessed. In this study, based on three field experiments, we quantified the effect of ground dwelling predators and parasitoids on two functional groups of broccoli pests. Relying on physical exclusion, we showed that ground dwelling predators significantly lowered the abundance of both the cabbage root fly (Delia radicum) and aphids (Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae). Ground dwelling predators made a significant contribution to natural pest control, as they lowered pest populations by 37% on average. Parasitoids suppressed 22% of pest populations. Our results suggest that intraguild predation was not an issue since ground dwelling predators did not have a negative impact on the level of natural pest control by parasitoids. Finally, early predation by ground dwelling predators on the cabbage root fly, the most harmful pest in this study, reduced damage in a highly infested context, meaning that natural pest control can effectively support crop production. These results strongly suggest that agricultural practices limiting soil disturbances or even favoring ground dwelling predator overwintering or colonization could lead to fewer damage and losses for farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are freely available at the following link: https://doi.org/10.15454/IOBLWS.

Code availability

The R code used to analyze data and perform figures is freely available at the following link: https://doi.org/10.15454/IOBLWS

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the team at the “UE 0787 Domaine Expérimental de la Motte” in Le Rheu and the team at the experimental station “Terre d’Essais” in Pleumeur-Gautier for supplying and managing the fields used in our experiments. We also thank Vianney Estorgues for helpful information about the agronomy of brassicaceous vegetables. We thank Dr. Leigh Gebbie for the English revision of this manuscript. Finally, we thank the two anonymous reviewers for the detailed comments and suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Région Bretagne (Grant n° 0461/ COH14000/00001042) and the Chaire AEI (Grant n° 2016 0190).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xavier Mesmin or Anne Le Ralec.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

All authors gave written informed consent for publication.

Ethics approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Communicated by Mattias Jonsson.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 666 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mesmin, X., Maret, M., Vincent, M. et al. Biological control at work: demonstrating the complementary effects of natural enemies on two contrasting pests and the damage they cause. J Pest Sci 95, 653–667 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-021-01426-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-021-01426-8

Keywords

Navigation