Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of the introduction of Lobesia botrana in suitable areas for Vitis vinifera

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), is a pest that has great potential to cause damage to vineyards. Considering that L. botrana is one of the major grapevine pests globally, it is essential to analyze the risk of its introduction and determine places with higher potential for the establishment of this pest. In this study, we highlighted the most prone regions in the world for the occurrence of L. botrana and its main host, Vitis vinifera, based on the bioclimatic and occurrence region for the pest and the crop, using ecological niche modeling with the MaxEnt algorithm. A survey was also made of the location of 3700 airports around the world, to emphasize the possible influx of people and material carrying the pest in different countries. The climatic variables that most influenced the establishment of L. botrana were annual average temperature, annual mean precipitation, and annual temperature variation. The regions with the greatest possibility of the occurrence of both species (L. botrana and V. vinifera) were those with average annual temperatures close to 13 °C, a mean annual precipitation between 600 and 700 mm, an annual temperature variation of approximately 28 °C, an average daily temperature range of 10 °C, and precipitation of approximately 20 mm in the coldest month. These characteristics are found in almost all vineyard regions globally. This study allowed us to determine the relationship between the environmental preferences of L. botrana and V. vinifera, making it possible to choose locations to focus on combatting the pest and implementing preventive actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello-Lammens ME, Boria RA, Radosavljevic A, Vilela B, Anderson RP (2015) spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 38:541–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Amo-Salas M, Ortega-López V, Harman R, Alonso-González A (2011) A new model for predicting the flight activity of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Crop Prot 30:1586–1593

    Google Scholar 

  • Aurand J (2017) OIV Statistical Report on World Vitiviniculture., France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa F, Alexandre J, Morais E, Lohmann T, da Silva M (2017) Priorização de pragas quarentenárias ausentes: metodologia e lista das 20 pragas mais importantes. Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura-Documentos (INFOTECA-E)

  • Boria RA, Olson LE, Goodman SM, Anderson RP (2014) Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecol Modell 275:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Botton M, Nondillo A, Carbonari J, Lucchi A (2014) Traça europeia dos cachos da videira Lobesia botrana: uma praga em expansão nas Américas. Embrapa Uva e Vinho-Comunicado Técnico (INFOTECA-E)

  • Braga ADAC, Zampieri FL, Fauri A, Ruckert A (2016) Plural territorial integration and road network configuration in South America. Proc 11th Sp Syntax Symp 17

  • Brown JL (2014) SDM toolbox: a python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. Methods Ecol Evol 5:694–700

    Google Scholar 

  • CABI, European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) datasheet, 2018. https://www.plantwise.org/knowledgebank/datasheet/42794. Accessed 23 Jan 2020

  • Castex V, Beniston M, Calanca P, Fleury D, Moreau J (2018) Pest management under climate change: the importance of understanding tritrophic relations. Sci Total Environ 616:397–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa AS, Cordeiro EM, Omoto C (2019) Agricultural insect hybridization and implications for pest management. Pest Manag Sci 75:2857–2864

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa CA, Guiné RP, Costa DV, Correia HE, Nave A (2019) Pest control in organic farming. In Organic farming. Woodhead Publishing, pp 41–90

  • da Silva RS, Kumar L, Shabani F, Ribeiro AV, Picanço MC (2018) Dry stress decreases areas suitable for Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and affects its survival under climate predictions in South America. Ecol Inform 46:103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly C (2006) Guidelines for assessing the suitability of spatial climate data sets. Int J Climatol Q J Roy Meteor Soc 26:707–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueñas JR, Llinás GA, Panzetta-Dutari G, Gardenal C (2009) Two different routes of colonization of Aedes aegypti in Argentina from neighboring countries. J Med Entomol 46:1344–1354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschen R, Britton K, Brockerhoff E, Burgess T, Dalley V, Epanchin-Niell RS, Gupta K, Hardy G, Huang Y, Kenis M, Kimani E (2015) International variation in phytosanitary legislation and regulations governing importation of plants for planting. Environ Sci Policy 51:228–237

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT F (2017) http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

  • Fidelis E, Lohmann TR, da Silva ML, Parizzi P, Alexandre J, Barbosa F (2018) Priorização de pragas quarentenárias ausentes no Brasil. Embrapa Roraima-Livro científico (ALICE)

  • Gallardo A, Ocete R, Lopez M, Maistrello L, Ortega F, Semedo A, Soria F (2009) Forecasting the flight activity of Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) in southwestern Spain. J Appl Entomol 133:626–632

    Google Scholar 

  • GBIF.org (2018) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.mir4y8

  • Gilligan TM, Epstein ME, Passoa SC, Powell JA, Sage OC, Brown JW (2011) Discovery of Lobesia botrana ([Denis & Schiffermüller]) in California: an invasive species new to North America (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 113:14–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez AP, Ponti L, Cooper ML, Gilioli G, Baumgärtner J, Duso C (2012) Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana (Den. & Schiff.) in California. Agric For Entomol 14:225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán NV, Lanteri AA, Confalonieri VA (2012) Colonization ability of two invasive weevils with different reproductive modes. Evol Ecol 26:1371–1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickel E (1996) Pragas da videira e seu controle no Estado de Santa Catarina. Epagri Florianópolis

  • Hijmans RJ, Elith J (2013) Species distribution modeling with R. R CRAN Project

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol Q J Roy Meteor Soc 25:1965–1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommay G, Gertz C, Kienlen JC, Pizzol J, Chavigny P (2002) Comparison between the control efficacy of Trichogramma evanescens Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) and two Trichogramma cacoeciae Marchal strains against grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff.), depending on their release density. Biocontrol Sci Technol 12:569–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifoulis AA, Savopoulou-Soultani M (2004) Biological control of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larvae by using different formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis in 11 vine cultivars under field conditions. J Econ Entomol 97:340–343

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iltis C, Martel G, Thiéry D, Moreau J, Louâpre P (2018) When warmer means weaker: high temperatures reduce behavioural and immune defences of the larvae of a major grapevine pest. J Pest Sci 91(4):1315–1326

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis C, Moreau J, Manière C, Thiéry D, Delbac L, Louâpre P (2020a) Where you come from matters: temperature influences host–parasitoid interaction through parental effects. Oecologia 192:853–863

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iltis C, Moreau J, Pecharová K, Thiéry D, Louâpre P (2020b) Reproductive performance of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana (Tortricidae) is adversely affected by warming scenario. J Pest Sci 93:679–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Anfora G, Tasin M, De Cristofaro A, Witzgall P, Lucchi A (2011) Chemical ecology and management of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Econ Entomol 104:1125–1137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Lucchi A, Varela LG (2012) Grape berry moths in western European vineyards and their recent movement into the New World. In: Arthropod management in Vineyards. Springer, pp 339–359

  • Jarnevich CS, Stohlgren TJ, Kumar S, Morisette JT, Holcombe TR (2015) Caveats for correlative species distribution modeling. Ecol Inform 29:6–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Jianying F, Xia W, Zetian F, Weisong M (2014) Assessment of consumers’ perception and cognition toward table grape consumption in China. Br Food J 116:611–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistner-Thomas EJ (2019) The potential global distribution and voltinism of the Japanese beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) under current and future climates. J Insect Sci 19:16

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ (2009) Maxent modeling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia. J Ecol Nat Environ 1:094–098

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Spaulding SA, Stohlgren TJ, Hermann KA, Schmidt TS, Bahls LL (2009) Potential habitat distribution for the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US. Front Ecol Environ 7:415–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Neven LG, Yee WL (2014) Evaluating correlative and mechanistic niche models for assessing the risk of pest establishment. Ecosphere 5:1–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Neven LG, Zhu H, Zhang R (2015) Assessing the global risk of establishment of Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using CLIMEX and MaxEnt Niche models. J Econ Entomol 108(4):1708–1719

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28:385–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, White M, Newell G (2013) Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. J Biogeogr 40:778–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucchi A, Sambado P, Juan Royo AB, Bagnoli B, Conte G, Benelli G (2018) Disrupting mating of Lobesia botrana using sex pheromone aerosol devices. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:22196–22204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maher N, Thiéry D (2006) Daphne gnidium, a possible native host plant of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana, stimulates its oviposition. Is a host shift relevant? Chemoecology 16:135–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merow C, Smith MJ, Silander JA (2013) A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36:1058–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller K, Arenas L, Thiéry D, Moreau J (2016a) Direct benefits from choosing a virgin male in the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana. Anim Behav 114:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller K, Thiéry D, Motreuil S, Moreau J (2016b) What makes a good mate? Factors influencing male and female reproductive success in a polyphagous moth. Anim Behav 120:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller K, Thiéry D, Delbac L, Moreau J (2017) Mating patterns of the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in sympatric and allopatric populations. Biol J Linnean Soc 120:685–699

    Google Scholar 

  • OpenFlights: Airport and airline data, 2018. https://openflights.org/data.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2020

  • Owens HL, Campbell LP, Dornak LL, Saupe EE, Barve N, Soberón J, Ingenloff K, Lira-Noriega A, Hensz CM, Myers CE (2013) Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas. Ecol Modell 263:10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Pertot I, Caffi T, Rossi V, Mugnai L, Hoffmann C, Grando MS, Gary C, Lafond D, Duso C, Thiery D, Mazzoni V, Anfora G (2017) A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for the implementation of IPM in viticulture. Crop Protect 97:70–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Papeş M, Soberón J (2008) Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol Modell 213:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson A, Soberon J, Pearson R, Anderson R, Martinez-Meyer E (2011) Ecological niches and geogrpahical distributions Princeton. Princeton University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 190:231–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Cabral NY, Kumar L, Shabani F (2017) Global alterations in areas of suitability for maize production from climate change and using a mechanistic species distribution model (CLIMEX). Sci Rep 7:5910

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos RS, Kumar L, Shabani F, Picanço MC (2018) Mapping global risk levels of Bemisia tabaci in areas of suitability for open field tomato cultivation under current and future climates. PLoS ONE 13:e0198925

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke A, Hilker M (2018) Plant semiochemicals–perception and behavioural responses by insects. Annu Plant Rev 2018:115–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Reineke A, Thiéry D (2016) Grapevine insect pests and their natural enemies in the age of global warming. J Pest Sci 89(2):313–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Roditakis NE, Karandinos MG (2001) Effects of photoperiod and temperature on pupal diapause induction of grape berry moth Lobesia botrana. Physiol Entomol 26(4):329–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrich R (1970) Diapause in Lobesia botrana Schiff (Lép., Tortricidae): induction and elimination. Ann Zool Ecol Anim 1:419–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Santana PA Jr, Kumar L, Da Silva RS, Pereira JL, Picanço MC (2019a) Assessing the impact of climate change on the worldwide distribution of Dalbulus maidis (DeLong) using MaxEnt. Pest Manag Sci 75:2706–2715

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santana P, Kumar L, Da Silva R, Picanço M (2019b) Global geographic distribution of Tuta absoluta as affected by climate change. J Pest Sci 2019:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeva R (1982) Food-plants of the grape moth (Lobesia botrana Schiff.) in Bulgaria. Gradinarska i Lozarska Nauka 19:83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacoli F, Cargnus E, Moosavi FK, Zandigiacomo P, Pavan F (2019) Efficacy and mode of action of kaolin and its interaction with bunch-zone leaf removal against Lobesia botrana on grapevines. J Pest Sci 92(2):465–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiery D, Moreau J (2005) Relative performance of European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) on grapes and other hosts. Oecologia 143:548

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thiéry D, Monceau K, Moreau J (2014) Different emergence phenology of European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana, Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) on six varieties of grapes. Bull Entomol Res 104:277–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thiéry D, Louâpre P, Muneret L, Rusch A, Sentenac G, Vogelweith F, Iltis C, Moreau J (2018) Biological protection against grape berry moths. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 38:15

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Vila L, Rodriguez-Molina M, Roehrich R, Stockel J (1999) Vine phenological stage during larval feeding affects male and female reproductive output of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bull Entomol Res 89:549–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzanakakis Μ, Savopoulou-Soultani Μ, Oustapassidis C, Verras S, Hatziemmanouel Η (1988) Induction of dormancy in Lobesia botrana by long day and high temperature conditions. Entomol Hell 6:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA, Host list for Lobesia botrana (European Gravepine Moth), 2012. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/eg_moth/downloads/Lobesia_botrana_host_list.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2020

  • Veloz SD (2009) Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. J Biogeogr 36:2290–2299

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilela E, Zucchi R (2015) Pragas introduzidas no Brasil: insetos e ácaros. FEALQ, Piracicaba

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the following entities for grant and scholarship financial support: ‘Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico’ (CNPq), the ‘Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior’ (CAPES), Finance Code 001, and the ‘Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais’ (FAPEMIG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RSR, RSS, EGF and MCP conceived and designed research. AR, RSR and RSS acquired data. RSR analyzed the data. AR wrote the manuscript. RSR, RSS, EGF and JRSS made critical revisions (providing writing assistance). EGF and MCP made critical revisions and approved final version. All authors reviewed and approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Soares Ramos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Gross.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rank, A., Ramos, R.S., da Silva, R.S. et al. Risk of the introduction of Lobesia botrana in suitable areas for Vitis vinifera. J Pest Sci 93, 1167–1179 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-020-01246-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-020-01246-2

Keywords

Navigation