Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 90, Issue 1, pp 173–182 | Cite as

When host-plant resistance to a pest leads to higher plant damage

  • J. A. NboyineEmail author
  • D. Saville
  • S. Boyer
  • R. H. Cruickshank
  • S. D. Wratten
Original Paper


The effects of the association between grasses and fungal endophytes on orthopterans are very poorly studied although they are important grassland pests. Here, the endemic New Zealand weta, Hemiandrus sp. ‘promontorius’, and Festulolium loliaceum infected with Epichloë uncinata, were used to study the effect of endophyte-mediated resistance in grasses on this large orthopteran insect in the laboratory, and the effects of this interaction on the grass. The insect was presented with F. loliaceum with and without E. uncinata infection in no-choice and paired choice experiments. Other controls were Epichloë festucae-infected Festuca rubra and endophyte-free Lolium perenne. In no-choice experiments, persistent attempts by the insect to graze the endophyte-infected grasses (but promptly abandoning them) resulted in a significantly higher number of plants lost due to excision at their stems after the first bite (P = 0.004). The inability of affected grasses to compensate for the lost biomass resulted in a lack of significant difference between the dry biomass of endophyte-infected and endophyte-free controls (P = 0.206). However, in choice experiments, there was a preference for the endophyte-free controls when they were paired with the endophyte-infected grasses (P < 0.05). The current work shows that endophyte-infected grasses can sustain high plant losses when attacked by an orthopteran insect in the absence of an alternative food source. This contrasts other endophyte/herbivory experiments in which high herbivory occurs because chemical plant defences are at a low concentration or the endophytes have other non-toxin roles in the plant.


Epichloë uncinata Loline alkaloids Festulolium loliaceum Biomass loss Orthoptera Pest management 



This study was funded by New Zealand Government’s Callaghan Innovation PhD Research and Development Fellowship Grant (Project no. CONB201) in collaboration with Constellation Brands NZ and CropMark Seeds Ltd., Christchurch. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Joanne Brady of Constellation Brands NZ. The grass seeds used in this study and the service of testing for loline alkaloids were generously provided by Brian Patchett and Tim Gillanders of CropMark Seeds Ltd.


This study was funded by New Zealand Government’s Callaghan Innovation PhD Research and Development Fellowship Grant (Project number CONB 201).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.


  1. Afkhami M, Rudgers J (2009) Endophyte mediated resistance to herbivores depends on herbivore identity in the wild grass Festuca subverticillata. Environ Entomol 38:1086–1095CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Azevedo JL, Maccheroni W Jr, Pereira JO, Araujo WL (2000) Endophytic microorganisms: a review on insect control and recent advances on tropical plants. Electron J Biotechnol 3(1):15–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball OJP, Tapper BA (1999) The production of loline alkaloids in artificial and natural grass/endophyte associations. In: Proceedings of New Zealand Plant Protection Conference, New Zealand Plant Protection Society 1998, pp 264–269Google Scholar
  4. Barker GM (2011) Response of wingless grasshopper t artificial diets and seed containing loline alkaloids. Technical Report 134. Cropmark Seeds Ltd., Christchurch. pp 10. Accessed 7 Feb 2016
  5. Barker GM, Patchett BJ, Cameron NE (2014) Epichloë uncinata infection and loline content afford Festulolium grasses protection from black beetle (Heteronychus arator). NZ J Ag Res 58(1):35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker GM Patchett BJ, Cameron NE (2015) Epichloë uncinata infection and loline content protect Festulolium grasses from crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Econ Entomol. 1–9. doi: 10.1093/jee/tou058
  7. Branson DH, Joern A, Sword GA (2006) Sustainable management of inset herbivores in grassland eosystems: new perspectives in grasshopper control. Bioscience 56(9):743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brévaulta T, Heubergerb S, Zhangb M, Ellers-Kirkb C, Nic X, Massond L, Lib X, Tabashnikb BE, Carrière Y (2013) Potential shortfall of pyramided transgenic cotton for insect resistance management. PNAS 110(15):5806–5811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryant RH, Cameron NE, Edwards GR (2010) Response of black beetle and red-headed pasture cockchafer larvae to loline alkaloids in meadow fescue roots. N Z Plant Prot 63:219–223Google Scholar
  10. Bultman TL, Conard NJ (1998) Effects of endophytic fungus, nutrient level, and plant damage on performance of fall army worm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 27(3):631–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clement SL, Elberson LR, Bosque-Pérez NA, Schotzko DJ (2005) Detrimental and neutral effects of wild barley-Neotyphodium fungal endophyte associations on insect survival. Entomol Exp Appl 114:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clement SL, Hu J, Steward AV, Wang B, Elberson LR (2011) Detrimental and neutral effects of a wild grass-fungal endophyte symbiotum on insect preference and performance. J Insect Sci 11:77. Available online: Scholar
  13. Crawford KM, Land JM, Rudgers JA (2010) Fungal endophytes of native grasses decrease insect herbivore preference and performance. Oecologia 164:431–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Easton HS, Lyons TB, Cooper BM, Mace WJ (2009) Loline alkaloids for better protection of pastures from insect pests. Proc N Z Grassland Assoc 71:151–154Google Scholar
  15. Faeth SH, Saikkonen K (2007) Variability is the nature of the endophyte-grass interaction. In: Popay AJ, Thom ER (eds) Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on fungal endophytes of grasses. Christchurch, New Zealand, March 25–28, 2006. Grassland research and practice series 13, New Zealand Grassland Association, Dunedin, New Zealand, pp 37–48Google Scholar
  16. Fernandes FL, Bacci L, Fernandes MS (2010) Impact and selectivity of insecticides to predators and parasitiods. EntomoBrasilis 3(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fletcher LR (1999) ‘Non-toxic’ endophytes in ryegrass and their effect on livestock health and production. Grassland research and practice series No. 7: 133–139.
  18. Fürstenberg-Hägg F, Zagrobelny M, Bak S (2013) Plant defense against insect herbivores. Int J Mol Sci 14:10242–10297. doi: 10.3390/ijms140510242 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Godfray HCJ, Garnett T (2014) Food security and sustainable intensification. Phil Trans R Soc B 369:20120273. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0273 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Guerre P (2015) Ergot alkaloids produced by endophytic fungi of the genus Epichloë. Toxins 7:773–790. doi: 10.3390/toxins7030773 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Gwynne DT (2004) Reproductive behavior of ground weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae): drumming behavior, nuptial feeding, post-copulatory guarding and maternal care. J Kans Entomol Soc 77(4):414–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haverkort AJ, Boonekamp PM, Hutten RCB, Jacobsen E, Lotz LAP, Kessel GJT, Visser RGF, van der Vossen EAG (2008) Societal costs of late blight in potato and prospects of durable resistance through cisgenic modification. Potato Res 51:47–57. doi: 10.1007/s11540-008-9089-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helms AM, De Moraes CM, Tooker JF, Mescher MC (2013) Exposure of Solidago altissima plants to volatile emissions of an insect antagonist (Eurosta solidaginis) deters subsequent herbivory. PNAS 110(1):199–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen JG, Popay AJ, Tapper BA (2009) Argentine stem weevil adults are affected by meadow fescue endophyte and its loline alkaloids. N Z Plant Prot 62:12–18Google Scholar
  25. Johns PM (2001) Distribution and conservation status of ground weta, Hemiandrus species (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae). Science for conservation 180. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones JDG, Witek K, Verweij W, Jupe F, Cooke D, Dorling S, Foster S (2014) Elevating crop disease resistance with cloned genes. Phil Trans R Soc B 369:20130087. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0087 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kogan M (1994) Plant resistance in pest management (revised). In: Metcalf RL, Luckmann WH (eds) Introduction to insect pest management. Wiley, New York, pp 76–101Google Scholar
  28. Kumari DA, Reddy DJ, Sharma HC (2006) Antixenosis mechanism of resistance in pigeonpea to the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. J Appl Entomol 130(1):10–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2005.01024.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leuchtmann A, Schmidt D, Bush LP (2000) Different levels of protective alkaloids in grasses with stroma-forming and seed-transmitted Epichloe/Neotyphodium endophytes. J Chem Ecol 26(4):1025–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis GC, White JF Jr, Bonnefont J (1993) Evaluation of grasses infected with fungal endophytes against locusts. Ann Appl Biol 14:142–143Google Scholar
  31. Lopez JE, Faeth SH, Miller M (1995) Effect of endophytic fungi on herbivory by redlegged grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on Arizona fescue. Environ Entomol 24(6):1576–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDonald TL, Erickson WP, McDonald LL (2000) Analysis of count data from before-after control-impact studies. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 5(3):262–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNaughton SJ (1979) Grazing as an optimization process: grass-ungulate relationships in Serengeti. Am Nat 113(5):691–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mortensen B (2013) Plant resistance against herbivory. Nature Education Knowledge 4(4):5Google Scholar
  35. Muvea AM, Meyhöfer R, Maniania NK, Poehling HM, Ekesi S, Subramanian S (2015) Behavioral responses of Thrips tabaci Lindeman to endophyte-inoculated onion plants. J Pest Sci 88(3):555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nboyine JA, Boyer S, Saville D, Smith MJ, Wratten SD (2016) Ground weta in vines of the Awatere Valley, Marlborough: biology, density and distribution. N Z J Zool. doi: 10.1080/03014223.2016.1193548 Google Scholar
  37. Oerke E-C (2006) Crop losses to pests. J Ag Sci 144:31–43. doi: 10.1017/S0021859605005708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patchett BJ, Chapman RB, Fletcher LR, Gooneratne SR (2008) Root loline concentration in endophyte infected meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) is increased by grass grub (Costelytra zealandica) attack. N Z Plant Prot 61:210–214Google Scholar
  39. Patchett BJ, Gooneratne SR, Chapman RB, Fletcher LR (2011) Effects of loline-producing endophyte-infected meadow fescue ecotypes on New Zealand grass grub (Costelytra zealandica). N Z J Agric Res 54:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pennell C, Ball OJ-P (1999) The effects of Neotyphodium endophytes in tall fescue on pasture mealybug (Balanococcus poae). N Z Plant Prot 52:259–263Google Scholar
  41. Popay AJ, Tapper BA (2006) Endophyte effects on consumption of seed and germinated seedlings of ryegrass and fescue by grass grub (Costelytra zealandica) larvae. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on fungal endophytes of grasses, pp 353–356Google Scholar
  42. Popay AJ, Hume DE (2011) Endophytes improve ryegrass persistence by controlling insects. Pasture persistence-grassland research and practice series 15:149–156.
  43. Popay AJ, Thom ER (2009) Endophyte effects on major insect pests in Waikato dairy pasture. Proc N Z Grassland Assoc 71:121–126Google Scholar
  44. Poppy GM, Jepson PC, Pickett JA, Birkett MA (2014) Achieving food and environmental security: new approaches to close the gap. Phil Trans R Soc B 369:20120272. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0272 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Ronald P (2011) Plant genetics, sustainable agriculture and global food security: review. Genetics 188:11–20. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.128553 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Saikkonen K, Helander M, Faeth SH, Schultess F, Wilson D (1999) Endophytegrass-herbivore interactions: the case of Neotyphodium endophytes in Arizona fescue populations. Oecologia 121:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schardi CL, Florea S, Pan J, Nagabhyru P, Bec S, Calie PJ (2013) The Epichloë alkaloid diversity and roles in symbiosis with grasses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16(4) 480–488. doi:
  48. Shennan C (2008) Biotic interactions, ecological knowledge and agriculture. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:717–739. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2180 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Wyngaarden F (1995) The ecology of the Tekapo ground weta (Hemiandrus new sp., Orthoptera, Anastostomatidae) and recommendations for the conservation of a threatened close relative. Unpublished MSc thesis, University of Canterbury, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  50. Wahid MB (1978) The biology and economic impact of the weta, Hemiandrus sp. (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae) in an apricot orchard, Horotane Valley. Doctoral dissertation, Lincoln College, University of CanterburyGoogle Scholar
  51. War A, Paulraj MG, Ahmad T, Buhroo A, Hussain B, Ignacimuthu S, Sharma HC (2012) Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal Behav 7(10):1306–1320. doi: 10.4161/psb.21663 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Yates SG, Petroski RJ, Powell RG (1990) Analysis of loline alkaloids in endophyte-infected tall fescue by capillary gas chromatography. J Agric Food Chem 38:182–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang XX, Li CJ, Nan ZB, Matthew C (2011) Neotyphodium endophyte increases Achnatherum inebrians (drunken horse grass) resistance to herbivores and seed predators. Weed Res 52:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Nboyine
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Saville
    • 2
  • S. Boyer
    • 1
    • 3
  • R. H. Cruickshank
    • 4
  • S. D. Wratten
    • 1
  1. 1.Bio-Protection Research CentreLincoln UniversityChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Saville Statistical Consulting LimitedLincolnNew Zealand
  3. 3.Environmental and Animal SciencesUnitec Institute of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  4. 4.Department of Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture and Life SciencesLincoln UniversityChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations