Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of an ultrasonic device on the behaviour and the stress hormone corticosterone in feral pigeons

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The worldwide presence of feral pigeons Columba livia domestica in urban habitats presents potential public health hazards from pathogens and parasites, and droppings can lead to damage to buildings. A variety of lethal and non-lethal chemical repellents, visual, sonic or mechanic measures are available to deter pigeons, but they are not always applicable or effective. Ultrasonic devices are one of the available possibilities with the advantage of being inaudible to humans and more or less harmless to animals. However, their utility is questionable, because the upper limit of frequencies heard by pigeons reported is well below that of ultrasound. We tested whether a commercially used ultrasound deterrent system has an effect on the behaviour of free-living, as well as caged feral pigeons and assessed whether ultrasound has a physiological effect, i.e. whether it can activate the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal-axis (HPA-axis) known to trigger flight behaviour. Our experimental tests did neither show any effect on the behaviour and the HPA-axis of the caged pigeons nor any deterring effect on the free-living pigeons. A habituation effect could not be detected. We therefore, conclude that ultrasound does not deter feral pigeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassi M, Chiantante D (1976) The role of pigeon excrement in stone biodeterioration. Intern Biodeterior Bull 12:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuter KJ, Weiss R (1986) Properties of the auditory systems in birds and the effectiveness of acoustic scaring signals. Meet Bird Strike Comm Eur 8:60–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezzel E, Prinzinger R (1990) Ornithologie. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird-X http://www.bird-x.com

  • Bomford M (1990) Ineffectiveness of a sonic device for deterring starlings. Wildl Soc Bull 18:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomford M, O’Brien PH (1990) Sonic deterrents in animal damage control: a review of device tests and effectiveness. Wildl Soc Bull 18:411–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R (2005) Equipped for life: the adaptive role of the stress axis in male mammals. J Mamm 86:236–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark L (1998) Review of bird repellents. Proceedings of the 18th Vertebrate Pest Conference 329–337, http://www.digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpc18/6

  • Cockrem JF, Silverin B (2002) Sight of a predator can stimulate a corticosterone response in the Great Tit (Parus major). Gen Comp Endocrinol 125:248–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desostar GmbH (2013) www.desostar.com

  • Giunchi D, Albores-Barajas YV, Baldaccini NE, Vanni L, Soldatini C (2012) Feral pigeons: problems, dynamics and control methods. In: Soloneski S (ed), Integrated pest management and pest control—current and future tactics, InTech, Europe, pp 215–240

  • Griffith RE (1987) Efficacy testing of an ultrasonic bird repeller. In: Shumake SS, Bullard RW (eds). Vertebrate pest control and management materials, 5th vol. ASTM Spec Tech Publ 974, Philadelphia, pp 56–63

  • Haag-Wackernagel D (2000) Behavioural responses of the feral pigeon (Columbidae) to deterring systems. Folia Zool 49:101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag-Wackernagel D (2010) Taubenabwehr, Tierschutz – Verhalten – Wirkung. Universität Basel, Verlag Medizinische Biologie

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag-Wackernagel D, Bircher AJ (2010) Ectoparasites from feral pigeons affecting humans. Dermatol 220:82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haag-Wackernagel D, Moch H (2004) Health hazards posed by feral pigeons. J Infect 48:307–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haase E, Rees A, Harvey S (1986) Flight stimulates adrenocortical activity in pigeons (Columba livia). Gen Comp Endocrinol 61:424–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamershock DM (1992) Ultrasonics as a method of bird control. Report. Flight Dynamics Directorate, Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

  • Heldmaier G, Neuweiler G (2003) Vergleichende tierphysiologie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kéry M (2010) Introduction to WinBUGS for ecologists. Academic Press, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason JR (1997) Overview of controls: why they work and how they function. Repellents. In: Nolte DL, Wagner KK (eds) Wildlife damage management for natural resource managers. Western Forestry and Conservation Association, Portland, pp 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Monclús R, Rödel HG, Von Holst D, De Miguel J (2005) Behavioural and physiological responses of naive European rabbits to predator odour. Anim Behav 70:753–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro CJ, Lasley BL (1988) Non-radiometric methods for immunoassay of steroid hormones. In: Albertson BD, Haseltine FP (eds) Non-radiometric assays: technology and application in polypeptide and steroid hormone detection. Liss, New York, pp 289–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro CJ, Stabenfeldt G (1984) Development of a microtitre plate enzyme immunoassay for the determination of progesterone. J Endocrinol 101:41–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer M (2003) JAGS: A Program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using gibbs sampling. Proceedings of the 3rd Internnational Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003)

  • R Core Team (2012): R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Rees A, Harvey S (1987) Adrenocortical responses of pigeons (Columba livia) to treadwheel exercise. Gen Comp Endocrinol 65:117–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romero LM, Reed JM (2005) Collecting baseline corticosterone samples in the field: Is under 3 min good enough? Comp Biochem Physiol 140:73–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU (2000) How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 21:55–89

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulkin J, Morgan MA, Rosen JB (2005) A neuroendocrine mechanism for sustaining fear. Trends Neurosci 28:629–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shumake SA, Kolz AL, Crane KA, Johnson RE (1982) Variables affecting ultrasound repellency in Philippine rats. J Wildl Manage 46:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan M, John TM, George JC, Etches RJ (1987) Flight effects on plasma glucose, lactate, catecholamines and corticosterone in homing pigeons. Horm Metabol Res 19:400–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield JC, Maney DL, Breuner C, Jacobs JD, Lynn S, Ramenofsky M, Richardson RD (1998) Ecological bases of hormone-behavior interactions: the “emergency life history stage”. Integr Comp Biol 38:191–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woronecki PP (1988) Effect of ultrasonic, visual, and sonic devices on pigeon numbers in a vacant building. In: Crabb AC, Marsh RE (eds) Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, vol 13, University of California, Davis, pp 266–272

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank G. Häfliger who installed the video system. Special thanks go to L. Rumpf who took care of the pigeons in the aviaries, analysed the videos and helped with the corticosterone analysis. R. Weibel provided the ultrasonic devices and installed them for our experiments. R. Maggini, C. Müller, B. Almasi, B. Homberger and L. Jenni helped to take blood samples. I. Kaiser helped counting the pigeons on the numerous photos taken at the dovecote. We also thank M. Keller, S. Steiner and F. Vannay of the department of environment of the city of Lucerne, H. Lampart, person in charge of the dovecot in the townhall of Lucerne, C. Grünenfelder of the preservation of historic buildings and monuments of the canton of Lucerne and D. Mathis, facility management of the city of Lucerne. The study was financed by the Foundation Hans Wilsdorf, Switzerland. We thank D. Haag-Wackernagel and L. Jenni for critical comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Jenni-Eiermann.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Jacob.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenni-Eiermann, S., Heynen, D. & Schaub, M. Effect of an ultrasonic device on the behaviour and the stress hormone corticosterone in feral pigeons. J Pest Sci 87, 315–322 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-014-0553-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-014-0553-y

Keywords

Navigation