Abstract
The guava fruit fly, Bactrocera correcta (Bezzi) (Diptera:Tephritidae), is a harmful exotic insect pest in mainland China, which was first recorded in Yuanjiang County of Yunnan province in 1982. In order to elucidate its rate of spread, extensive field surveys were conducted during 2003–2011. Through 2011, B. correcta was found in areas below 1,500 m in altitude within the Longitudinal Range-Gorge Region of southwestern China (21–28°N latitude, 97–107°E longitude). The northernmost site where B. correcta was found was in Miyi County (26.48°N Latitude, 102.00°E longitude, Alt. 1,060 m) in Sichuan province. Within the currently infested area of mainland China, B. correcta mainly occurred in low-altitude valleys and basins, and displayed a patchy distribution. The mountain chains tend to run south to north, forming a natural barrier to insect flight eastward and westward. Human-assisted transport of infested fruits was the likely factor by which B. correcta moved across mountain chains. The analysis indicated that high-altitude portions of the northern Longitudinal Range-Gorge Region may block B. correcta spread northward.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allwood AJ, Chinajariyawong A, Drew RAI, Hamacek EL, Hancock DL, Hengsawad JC, Jirasurat M, Kong Krong C, Kritsaneepaiboon S, Leong CTS, Vijaysegaran S (1999) Host plant records for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South East Asia. Raffles Bull Zool Suppl 7:1–92
Bezzi M (1916) On the fruit-flies of the genus Dacus occurring in India, Burma, and Ceylon. Bull Entomol Res 7:99–121
Chen X, Liu XF, Ye H (2010) The major fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) pest species and their geographic distribution in Yunnan Province. Acta Ecol Sinica 30:717–725
DeBach P (1966) The competitive displacement and coexistence principles. Annu Rev Entomol 11:183–212
Drew RAI, Raghu S (2002) The fruit fly fauna (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) of the rainforest habitat of the Western Chats, India. Raffles Bull Zool 20:327–352
Duyck PF, David P, Quilici S (2004) A review of relationships between interspecific competition and invasions in fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ecol Entomol 29:511–520
Étienne J (1972) Les principales Trypétides nuisibles de l’Ile de la Réunion. Annales de la Societé. Entomologique de France (NS) 8:485–491
Gan S, He DM (2006) Assessment on eco-environment background of Yunnan plateau mountain region. J Yunnan Univ 28:161–165
Goergen G, Vayssières JF, Gnanvossou D, Tindo M (2011) Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae), a new invasive fruit fly pest for the Afrotropical region: host plant range and distribution in West and Central Africa. Environ Entomol 40(4):844–854
He DM, Wu SH, Peng H, Yang ZF, Ou XK, Cui BS (2005) A study of ecosystem changes in longitudinal range-gorge region and transboundary eco-security in southwest China. Adv Earth Sci 20:932–943
Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Chessel D, Perrin N (2002) Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data. Ecology 83:2027–2036
Hulme PE (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46:10–18
Hutchinson G (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427
Liang GQ, Yang GH, Liang F, Situ BL, Liang XD (1996) Insects of Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Asia–Pacific area. Guangdong Science and Technology Press, Guangdong
Liu XF (2010) Studies on the occurrence, distribution and migration of Bactrocera correcta (Bezzi) in Yunnan. Ph.D. Dissertation, Yunnan University
Liu XF, Ye H (2009) Research progress of Bactrocera correcta (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Yunnan. Chinese J Biol Control 25:86–90
Liu XF, Wang DM, Ye H (2005) Overview on research of Bactrocera correcta (Bezzi). Trop Agric Sci Technol 28:30–33
Maynard GV, Hamilton JG, Grimshaw JF (2004) Quarantine-phytosanitary, sanitary and incursion management: an Australian entomological perspective. Aust J Entomol 43:318–328
Vargas RI, Leblanc L, Putoa R, Pinero JC (2012) Population dynamics of three Bactrocera spp. fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and two introduced natural enemies, Fopius arisanus (Sonan) and Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), after an invasion by Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) in Tahiti. Biol Control 60:199–206
Wan FH, Guo JY, Zhang F (2009) Research on biological invasions in China. Science Press, Beijing
Wang XJ (1996) The fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of the East Asian region. Acta Zool Sinica 21:52
Wang XJ, Zhao MZ (1989) Notes on the genus Dacus Fabricius in China with descriptions of five new species. Acta Zool Sinica 14:209–219
White IM, Elson-Harris MM (1992) Fruit flies of economic significance: their identification and bionomics. CAB International, Wallingford
Acknowledgments
We are most grateful to Robert A. Haack (USDA Forest Service) for provided valuable suggestions and editing this paper with great patience in every detail. We thank Dr. Jin Xu and Shaoji Hu (Yunnan University) for providing scientific suggestions. We also thank many kind people throughout southwestern China for caring for the fly traps used in this. The research was supported by Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (No. 200903047), Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (No. 2011FB005), Scientific Research Project of Yunnan University (No. 2010YB006), Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31160095), and Key Project of Yunnan Provincial Science & Technology (No. 2011FA003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by N. Desneux.
Yan Jin and Xiaofei Liu contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.
Appendix: Summary table of trap sites
Appendix: Summary table of trap sites
Monitoring records of Bactrocera correcta (Bezzi) in mainland China (2003–2011)
Site no. | County | Longitude | Latitude | 2003–2005 | 2006–2008 | 2009–2011 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ruili | 97.85 | 24.02 | ● | ● | ● |
2 | Ruili | 97.62 | 23.91 | ● | ● | ● |
3 | Wanding | 98.05 | 24.08 | ● | ● | ● |
4 | Yingjiang | 98.13 | 25.07 | ● | ● | ● |
5 | Longchuan | 97.93 | 24.31 | ● | ● | ● |
6 | Luxi | 98.35 | 24.33 | ● | ● | ● |
7 | Longling | 98.66 | 24.64 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
8 | Longling | 98.79 | 24.32 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
9 | Longling | 99.03 | 24.32 | ● | ● | ● |
10 | Shidian | 99.14 | 24.49 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
11 | Tengchong | 98.54 | 25.26 | × | ○ | ○ |
12 | Baoshan | 98.85 | 24.97 | ● | ● | ● |
13 | Baoshan | 99.26 | 25.14 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
14 | Changning | 99.43 | 24.77 | ● | ● | ● |
15 | Zhenkang | 99.13 | 23.74 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
16 | Zhenkang | 98.98 | 23.76 | ● | ● | ● |
17 | Gengma | 99.06 | 23.56 | ● | ● | ● |
18 | Gengma | 99.56 | 23.83 | ● | ● | ● |
19 | Gengma | 99.63 | 23.57 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
20 | Shuangjiang | 99.81 | 23.49 | ● | ● | ● |
21 | Yongde | 99.59 | 24.04 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
22 | Yongde | 99.37 | 24.07 | ● | ● | ● |
23 | Fengqing | 99.81 | 24.55 | × | ○ | ○ |
24 | Yunxian | 100.23 | 24.36 | × | ● | ● |
25 | Yunxian | 99.98 | 24.16 | ● | ● | ● |
26 | Yunxian | 100.48 | 24.51 | ● | ● | ● |
27 | Lincang | 100.69 | 23.87 | × | ○ | ○ |
28 | Shuangjiang | 99.95 | 23.39 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
29 | Shuangjiang | 99.82 | 23.46 | ● | ● | ● |
30 | Cangyuan | 98.98 | 23.22 | ● | ● | ● |
31 | Menglian | 99.39 | 22.24 | ● | ● | ● |
32 | Menghai | 100.25 | 22.59 | ● | ● | ● |
33 | Menghai | 100.31 | 22.19 | ● | ● | ● |
34 | Menghai | 100.18 | 21.74 | ● | ● | ● |
35 | Jinghong | 100.77 | 21.97 | ● | ● | ● |
36 | Jinghong | 100.91 | 21.86 | ● | ● | ● |
37 | Jinghong | 101.23 | 22.36 | ● | ● | ● |
38 | Mengla | 101.25 | 21.93 | ● | ● | ● |
39 | Mengla | 101.29 | 21.44 | ● | ● | ● |
40 | Mengla | 101.33 | 22.17 | ● | ● | ● |
41 | Lancang | 99.86 | 22.50 | ● | ● | ● |
42 | Pu’er | 100.43 | 22.64 | ● | ● | ● |
43 | Pu’er | 101.28 | 23.34 | ● | ● | ● |
44 | Pu’er | 101.10 | 23.38 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
45 | Jingdong | 100.57 | 24.64 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
46 | Jingdong | 100.82 | 24.50 | ● | ● | ● |
47 | Jiangcheng | 101.36 | 22.69 | ● | ● | ● |
48 | Jiangcheng | 102.16 | 22.46 | ● | ● | ● |
49 | Zhenyuan | 100.96 | 23.91 | × | ○ | ○ |
50 | Mojiang | 101.75 | 23.03 | ● | ● | ● |
51 | Mojiang | 101.58 | 23.50 | ● | ● | ● |
52 | Lvchun | 102.18 | 22.89 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
53 | Honghe | 102.05 | 23.21 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
54 | Honghe | 102.36 | 23.38 | ● | ● | ● |
55 | Xinping | 101.41 | 24.15 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
56 | Xinping | 101.73 | 24.32 | ● | ● | ● |
57 | Xinping | 101.72 | 23.85 | ● | ● | ● |
58 | Xinping | 102.15 | 23.92 | ○ | ● | ● |
59 | Yuanjiang | 101.83 | 23.70 | ● | ● | ● |
60 | Yuanjiang | 101.99 | 23.57 | ● | ● | ● |
61 | Yuanjiang | 102.17 | 23.45 | ● | ● | ● |
62 | Yuanjiang | 102.00 | 23.69 | ● | ● | ● |
63 | Yuanjiang | 102.03 | 23.74 | ○ | ● | ● |
64 | Yuanjiang | 102.07 | 23.81 | ○ | ● | ● |
65 | Yuanjiang | 101.92 | 23.47 | × | ○ | ○ |
66 | Yuanjiang | 102.09 | 23.52 | ● | ● | ● |
67 | Yuanjiang | 102.08 | 23.87 | ○ | ● | ● |
68 | Yuanyang | 102.82 | 23.22 | ● | ● | ● |
69 | Jinping | 102.80 | 22.73 | ● | ● | ● |
70 | Jinping | 103.42 | 22.92 | ● | ● | ● |
71 | Hekou | 103.93 | 22.52 | ● | ● | ● |
72 | Pingbian | 103.79 | 22.97 | ● | ● | ● |
73 | Jinggu | 100.19 | 23.06 | ● | ● | ● |
74 | Jinggu | 100.60 | 23.24 | ● | ● | ● |
75 | Eshan | 102.18 | 24.07 | ○ | ● | ● |
76 | Eshan | 102.24 | 24.28 | ○ | ● | ● |
77 | Eshan | 102.10 | 24.33 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
78 | Jianshui | 102.77 | 23.58 | ○ | ● | ● |
79 | Jianshui | 102.89 | 23.72 | ○ | ● | ● |
80 | Jianshui | 102.89 | 23.61 | ○ | ● | ● |
81 | Mengzi | 103.34 | 23.34 | ○ | ● | ● |
82 | Mengzi | 103.43 | 23.21 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
83 | Gejiu | 103.11 | 23.30 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
84 | Huaning | 103.09 | 24.25 | ○ | ● | ● |
85 | Huaning | 102.93 | 24.24 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
86 | Lushui | 98.85 | 25.84 | ○ | ● | ● |
87 | Deqin | 98.84 | 28.29 | × | × | ○ |
88 | Gongshan | 98.67 | 27.83 | × | × | ○ |
89 | Litang | 99.62 | 29.83 | × | × | ○ |
90 | Lijiang | 99.79 | 26.78 | × | × | ○ |
91 | Weixi | 99.09 | 27.29 | × | × | ○ |
92 | Lanping | 99.13 | 26.48 | × | × | ○ |
93 | Jianchuan | 99.66 | 26.38 | × | ○ | ○ |
94 | Eryuan | 99.79 | 26.02 | × | ○ | ○ |
95 | Heqing | 100.21 | 26.24 | × | ○ | ○ |
96 | Ninglang | 100.6 | 27.18 | × | ○ | ○ |
97 | Yongsheng | 100.65 | 26.46 | × | ○ | ○ |
98 | Binchuan | 100.52 | 25.78 | × | ○ | ○ |
99 | Xiangyun | 100.69 | 25.45 | × | ○ | ○ |
100 | Yaoan | 101.16 | 25.52 | × | ○ | ○ |
101 | Dayao | 101.26 | 25.84 | × | ○ | ○ |
102 | Dayao | 101.50 | 25.65 | × | ○ | ○ |
103 | Huaping | 101.25 | 26.61 | × | ○ | ○ |
104 | Yongren | 101.63 | 26.00 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
105 | Yanyuan | 101.47 | 27.45 | × | ○ | ○ |
106 | Xichang | 102.19 | 27.85 | × | ○ | ○ |
107 | Dechang | 102.15 | 27.26 | × | ○ | ○ |
108 | Miyi | 102.07 | 26.84 | × | ○ | ● |
109 | Panzhihua | 101.68 | 26.54 | × | ○ | ● |
110 | Yanbian | 101.42 | 26.96 | × | ○ | ○ |
111 | Huili | 102.18 | 26.56 | × | ○ | ○ |
112 | Yuanmou | 101.86 | 25.89 | ○ | ● | ● |
113 | Yuanmou | 101.84 | 25.71 | ○ | ● | ● |
114 | Yuanmou | 101.89 | 25.96 | ○ | ● | ● |
115 | Yuanmou | 101.87 | 25.75 | × | ● | ● |
116 | Wuding | 102.15 | 25.50 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
117 | Wuding | 102.09 | 25.90 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
118 | Luquan | 102.49 | 25.81 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
119 | Malong | 103.46 | 25.29 | × | × | ○ |
120 | Qujing | 103.88 | 25.52 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
121 | Luoping | 104.31 | 25.02 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
122 | Fuyuan | 104.22 | 25.48 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
123 | Xuanwei | 104.07 | 26.23 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
124 | Ludian | 103.42 | 27.13 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
125 | Zhaotong | 103.65 | 27.34 | × | ○ | ○ |
126 | Hezhang | 104.57 | 27.04 | × | × | ○ |
127 | Yiliang | 104.07 | 27.56 | × | ○ | ○ |
128 | Yongshan | 103.52 | 27.91 | × | ○ | ○ |
129 | Zhenxiong | 104.68 | 27.67 | × | ○ | ○ |
130 | Yanjin | 104.11 | 28.14 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
131 | Daguan | 103.92 | 27.87 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
132 | Xingyi | 104.64 | 24.70 | × | × | ○ |
133 | Xilin | 104.68 | 24.54 | × | × | ○ |
134 | Guangnan | 104.85 | 23.89 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
135 | Baise | 106.61 | 23.87 | × | × | ○ |
136 | Baise | 106.75 | 23.78 | × | × | ○ |
137 | Funing | 105.87 | 23.81 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
138 | Kunming | 102.51 | 25.07 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
139 | Kunming | 102.63 | 24.96 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
140 | Kunming | 102.64 | 24.88 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
141 | Kunming | 102.81 | 24.84 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
142 | Kunming | 102.79 | 24.81 | ○ | × | ○ |
143 | Kunming | 102.70 | 25.08 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
144 | Yuxi | 102.46 | 24.24 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
145 | Yuxi | 102.54 | 24.46 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
146 | Yuxi | 102.51 | 24.28 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
147 | Shuangbai | 101.51 | 24.50 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
148 | Yimen | 102.17 | 24.67 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
149 | Anning | 102.39 | 24.93 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
150 | Shiping | 102.47 | 23.56 | ○ | ● | ● |
151 | Shiping | 102.36 | 23.83 | ○ | ● | ● |
152 | Dali | 100.21 | 25.62 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
153 | Weixin | 105.00 | 27.95 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
154 | Guiyang | 106.64 | 26.50 | × | × | ○ |
155 | Guiyang | 106.71 | 26.31 | × | × | ○ |
156 | Xundian | 102.86 | 25.52 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
157 | Chuxiong | 101.30 | 24.81 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
158 | Yongping | 99.59 | 25.43 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
159 | Jiangchuan | 102.71 | 24.28 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
160 | Nanjian | 100.45 | 24.83 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
161 | Luliang | 103.60 | 24.98 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
162 | Lufeng | 101.85 | 25.22 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
163 | Shizong | 104.19 | 24.50 | × | ○ | ○ |
164 | Mile | 103.35 | 23.96 | ○ | ● | ● |
165 | Mile | 103.43 | 24.39 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
166 | Qiubei | 104.09 | 24.31 | ○ | ○ | ○ |
167 | Kaiyuan | 103.27 | 23.69 | ○ | ● | ● |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Jin, Y. & Ye, H. Recent spread and climatic ecological niche of the invasive guava fruit fly, Bactrocera correcta, in mainland China. J Pest Sci 86, 449–458 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-013-0488-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-013-0488-8