Skip to main content
Log in

Predatory potential of three hunting spiders inhabiting the rice ecosystems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Present study was designed to assess the prey preference behaviour of three most dominant hunting spiders [Lycosa terrestris Butt, Anwar and Tahir 2006 (Araneae: Lycosidae), Pardosa birmanica Siman 1884 (Araneae: Lycosidae) and Oxyopes javanus (Thorell 1887) (Araneae: Oxyopidae)] of rice ecosystems both in the laboratory and in the field. Two types of laboratory experiments, i.e., choice and no choice feeding, were performed using only adult male and female specimens of the spiders. No choice test showed that each of the three hunting spiders readily consumed larvae and nymphs of rice pests offered. Female hunting spiders consumed more prey compared to male hunting spiders. Results of choice feeding test indicated that L. terrestris and P. birmanica preferred nymphs of rice insect pests while O. javanus preferred larvae of rice insect pests. Results of direct observations showed that in August, dipterous insects were the most numerous rice pests consumed by L. terrestris, P. birmanica and O. javanus, comprising over 56.3, 38 and 48% of their respective diets. In contrast, in September, the proportion of dipterous insects decreased dramatically and hoppers become the most numerous pests, comprising over 50, 51 and 41% of all prey and spiders consumed by L. terrestris, P. birmanica and O. javanus, respectively. In October, aquatic Heteroptera were frequently observed in their diets. Predatory potential of these hunting spiders differed statistically in the laboratory as well as in the field. It is concluded from the results of present project that studied species of spiders could successfully be used to control insect pests of rice ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belovsky GE, Blade JB, Chase JM (1990) Mating strategies based on foraging ability: an experiment with grasshoppers. Behav Ecol 7:438–444. doi:10.1093/beheco/7.4.438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna R, Zalom GF, Roltsch JW (2003) Relative impact of spider predation cover crop on population dynamics of Erythroneura variabilis in a raisin grape vine-yard. Entomol Exp Appl 107:109–116. doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00051.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood JD, Sunderland DK, Symondson CO (2001) Living where the food is: web location by linyphiid spiders in relation to prey availability in winter wheat. J Appl Ecol 38:88–99. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00572.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashmi AA (1994) Insect pest of paddy crops. IPM of cereals and cash crop, pp 1–59. http://www.parc.gov.pk/Respubs/Ipep.doc

  • Hayes LJ, Lockely CT (1990) Prey and nocturnal activity of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in cotton fields in the delta region of Mississippi. Environ Entomol 19:1512–1518

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishijima C, Motobayshi T, Nakai M, Kunimi Y (2004) Impact of tillage practices on hoppers and predatory wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in rice paddies. Appl Entomol Zool (Jpn) 39:155–162. doi:10.1303/aez.2004.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito y, Miyashita K, Sekiguchik H (1962) Studies on the predators of the rice crop insect pests, using the insecticidal check method. Jpn J Ecol 12:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RR, Pollard SD (1996) Predatory behavior of jumping spiders. Annu Rev Entomol 41:287–308. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.001443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jalaluddin SM, Mohan R, Velusamy R, Sadakathulla S (2000) Predatory behaviour in rice varieties under sodic soil conditions. Entomology 25:347–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara S, Kiritani K, Kakiya N (1974) Population biology of Lycosa pseudoannulata (Bös. et Str.). Bull Kochi Inst Agric For Sci 6:7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JP, Kim JC (1995) Influence of the levee and paddy burning on the fauna of overwintering spider. Kor Arachnol 11(2):59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiritani K, Hokyo N, Sasaba T, Nakasuji F (1970) Studies on population dynamics of green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler: regulatory mechanism of the population density. Res Popul Ecol (Kyoto) 12:137–153. doi:10.1007/BF02511560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang A, Filser J, Henschel JR (1999) Predation by ground beetles and wolf spiders on herbivorous insects in a maize crop. Agric Ecosyst Environ 72:189–199. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00186-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marc P, Canard A, Ysnel F (1999) Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:229–273. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00038-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motobayashi T, Ishijima C, Takaji M, Murakami M, Tacguchi A, Hidaka K, Kunimi Y (2006) Impact of tillage practices on spiders assemblages in rice paddy fields. Appl Entomol Zool (Jpn) 41:371–381. doi:10.1303/aez.2006.371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig W, Wissel C (1986) A comparison of prey lengths among spiders. Oecologia 68:595–600. doi:10.1007/BF00378777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M (2000) Do adult female lycosids feed during the period of maternal care. Bull Br Arachnol Soc 11:388–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M (1982) Field studies on the ecological role of spiders as insect predators in agroecosystems (abandoned grassland, meadows, and cereal fields). Ph.D Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich

  • Nyffeler M, Benz G (1988) Prey and predatory importance of micryphantid spiders in winter wheat. J Appl Entomol 105:190–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M, Benz G (1987) Spiders in natural pest control: a review. J Appl Ent 103:321–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M, Sunderland DK (2003) Composition, abundance and pest control potential of spider communities in agroecosystem. A comparison of European and U.S. studies. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95:579–612. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00181-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M, Sterling WL, Dean DA (1994a) How spiders make a living. Environ Entomol 23:1357–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M, Sterling WL, Dean DA (1994b) Insectivorous activities of spiders in United States field crops. J Appl Entomol 118:113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oedekoven MA, Joern A (2000) Plant quality and spider predation affects grasshoppers (Acrididae): food quality-dependant compensatory mortality. Ecology 81:66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oedekoven MA, Joem A (1998) Stage based mortality of grassland grasshoppers (Acrididae) from wandering spider (Lycosidae) predation. Acta Oecol 19:507–515. doi:10.1016/S1146-609X(99)80005-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oraze MJ, Grigarick AA (1989) Biological control of aster leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) by Pardosa ramulosa (Araneae: Lycosidae) in California rice fields. J Econ Entomol 82:745–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce S, Hebron WM, Raven RJ, Zalucki MP, Hassan E (2004) Spider fauna of Soyabean crop in south-east Queensland and their potential as predator of Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aust J Entomol 43:57–65. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.2003.00378.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce S, Zalucki MP (2006) Do predators aggregate in response to pest density in agroecosystem? Assessing within-field spatial patterns. J Appl Ecol 43:128–140. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01118.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedigo LP (2001) Entomology and pest management, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p 234

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner L, Wyss E (2004) Sown wildflower strips to enhance natural enemies of agricultural pests in annual and perennial cropping system. In: Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Altier MA (eds) Ecological engineering for pest management: advances in habitat manipulation for arthropods. CSIRO Press, Collingwood, pp 165–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1999) The hows and whys of successful pest suppression by spiders: insights from case studies. J Arachnol 27:387–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Bishop L (1990) Prey control by an assemblage of generalist predators: spiders in garden test systems. Ecology 71:1441–1450. doi:10.2307/1938281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Lockley T (1984) Spiders as biological control agents. Annu Rev Entomol 29:299–320. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.001503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschewitz I, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2005) Are landscape complexity and farm specialization related to land-use intensity of annual fields? Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:87–99. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MH, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2004) Landscape context of arthropod biological control. In: Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Altier MA (eds) Ecological engineering for pest management: advances in habitat manipulation for arthropods. CSIRO Press, Collingwood, pp 55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian AP, Mathew JM, Pathummal BS, Joseph J, Biju RC (2005) The spider fauna of the irrigated rice ecosystem in the central Kerala, India. J Arachnol 33:247–255396. doi:10.1636/05-08.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settle WH, Ariawan H, Astuti E, Cahyana W, Hakim AL, Hindayana D, Lestari AS, Pajarningsih S (1996) Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77(7):1975–1988. doi:10.2307/2265694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synder WE, Wise DH (1999) Predator interference and the establishment of generalist predator populations for biocontrol. Biol Control 15:283–292. doi:10.1006/bcon.1999.0723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir MH, Butt A (2008) Activities of spiders in rice fields of central Punjab, Pakistan. Acta Zool Sin 54(4):701–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Takashi M, Chikara I, Motonori T, Mihoko M, Ayame T, Kazumasa H, Yasuhisa K (2006) Effects of tillage practices on spider assemblage in rice paddy fields. Appl Entomol Zool (Jpn) 41(2):371–381. doi:10.1303/aez.2006.371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull AL (1960) The prey of the spider Linyphia triangularis (Clerck) (Araneae: Linyphiidae). Can J Zool 38:859–873. doi:10.1139/z60-091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW (1990) Prey selection in web-building spiders and evolution of prey defenses. In: Evans DL, Schmidt OJ (eds) Insect defense. Adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators. University of New Yark Press, Albeny, pp 93–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch R, Messenger PS, Gutierrez AP (1982) An introduction to biological control. Plenum Press, New York, p 247

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker ES, Rypstra LA (2001) Sexual dimorphism in functional response and troph morphology in Rabidosa rabida (Araneae: Lycosidae). Am Midl Nat 146:161–170. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2001)146[0161:SDIFRA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH (1993) Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 328

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu JS, Chen ZF, Zhu RL (1987) Study and application of spiders in rice fields in Zhejiang Province. Nat Enemy 9(1):140–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye ZX, Wang DD (1987) Population dynamics of spiders in rice fields of Jiangxi Province. Bull Biol Control 3(1):11–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hafiz Muhammad Tahir.

Additional information

Communicated by J. R. Bell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tahir, H.M., Butt, A. Predatory potential of three hunting spiders inhabiting the rice ecosystems. J Pest Sci 82, 217–225 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-008-0242-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-008-0242-9

Keywords

Navigation