Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Host instar suitability of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) for the parasitoid Eretmocerus mundus (Hym.: Aphelinidae)

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficient use of parasitoids in pest control depend on the knowledge of the biological relationships between host and parasitoid. Eretmocerus mundus Mercet (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) is one the most important natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) that is found in fields and greenhouses in Adana, Turkey. Although more studies have been done to determine the relationships between E. mundus and B. tabaci, the differences among strains of E. mundus could have important biological concequences. In this study, biological characteristics of native population of E. mundus parasitization of B. tabaci (Q biotype) were determined using bean plants Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) at a constant temperature of 25 ± 1°C, relative humidity 70 ± 10% and 16:8 (L:D) photoperiod regimen. All B. tabaci nymphal instars were parasitized by E. mundus, but the mean number of daily-parasitized nymphs was highest in the second instars (15.3). In addition, second instar females had the shortest mean development time (15.2 days). Mean development times of parasitoids obtained from first, second, third and fourth B. tabaci instars varied from 15.2 to 16.2 days and 15.2 to 15.9 days for female and male, respectively. Proportion of female (♀/♂+♀) varied from first (0.53) to second (0.34) host instars. Impact of results on potential biological control of B. tabaci was discussed through conservation native natural enemies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antony B, Palaniswami MS, Henneberry TJ (2003) Encarsia transvena (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) development on different Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) instars. Environ Entomol 32:584–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Avidov Z (1956) Bionomics of the tobacco white fly (Bemisia tabaci Gennad.) in Israel. Ktavim 7:25–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JK, Frohlich DR, Rosell RC (1995) The sweetpotato or silverleaf whiteflies: biotypes of Bemisia tabaci or species complex? Annu Rev Entomol 40:511–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castane C (2002) Status of biological and integrated control in greenhouse vegetables in Spain: successes and challenges. IOBC/WPRS Bull 25:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Castane C, Alomar O, Goula M, Gabarra R (2004) Colonization of tomato greenhouses by the predatory mirid bugs Macrolophus caliginosus and Dicyphus tamaninii. Biol Control 30:591–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Barro PJ, Hart PJ, Marton R (2000) The biology of two Eretmocerus spp. (Haldeman) and three Encarsia spp. Foster and their biological control agents of Bemisia tabaci biotype B in Australia. Entomol Exp Appl 94:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehler LE (2000) Critical issues related to nontarget effects in classical biological control of insects. In: Follet PA, Duan JJ (eds) Nontarget effects of biological control. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Foltyn S, Gerling D (1985) The parasitoids of the aleyrodid Bemisia tabaci in Israel: development, host preference and discrimination of the aphelinid wasp Eretmocerus mundus. Entomol Exp Appl 38:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerling D (2003) Development biology of Eretmocerus mundus. In: Book of abstracts of 3rd international Bemisia workshop Barcelona, 17–20 March, p77

  • Gerling D, Fried R (2000) Biological studies with Eretmocerus mundus Mercet (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in Israel. IOBC/WPRS Bull 23:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling D, Orion T, Delarea Y (1990) Eretmocerus penetration and immature development: a novel approach to overcome host immunity. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 13:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby JA, Ciomperlik MA, Legaspi BC, Legaspi JC, Wendel LE (1998) Laboratory and field evaluation of exotic parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Biotype “B”) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Biol Control 12:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg SM, Jones WA, Liu TX (2002) Interactions among two species of Eretmocerus (Hymenoptera: Aleyrodidae), two species of whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), and tomato. Environ Entomol 31:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz AR, Podoler H, Gerling D (1984) Life table analyses of tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in cotton fields in Israel. Ecol Appl 5:221–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones WA, Greenberg SM (1998) Suitability of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) instars for the Eretmocerus mundus (Hymenoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environ Entomol 27:1569–1573

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones WA, Greenberg SM, Legaspi BJ (1999) The effect of varying Bemisia argentifolii and Eretmocerus mundus ratios on parasitism. BioControl 44:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karut K, Arslan A (2004) Determination of natural mortality factor of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on cotton in greenhouse conditions. In: Proceedings of I. Plant protection congress of Turkey (Turkish with English abstract), 8–10 September, Samsun, p 34

  • Kaygısız H (1976) Investigations on the morphological characteristics, biology, damages, host plants, distributions and control of the cotton whitefly in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey (Turkish with English abstract). Publications of Agricultural Control Research Institute, 45:1–58

  • Lopez SN, Botto EN (1997) Biology of a South American population of Eretmocerus sp. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) attacking the greenhouse whitefly. Biol Control 9:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JH (2003) Whiteflies (Hemiptera. Aleyrodidae)—their systematic history and the resulting problems of conventional taxonomy, with special reference to descriptions of Aleyrodes proletella (Linnaeus, 1758) and Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius, 1889). Entomol Gaz 54:125–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft Excel (2002) Microsoft Office Excel ver. 2002. Microsoft Corporation, Seattle

  • MSTAT C (1989) A microcomputer program for the design, management and analyses agronomic research experiments. Michigan State University, East Lansing

  • Rose MG, Zolnerowich G, Hunter MS (1995) Systematics, Eretmocerus, and biological control. In: Gerling D, Mayer RT (eds) Bemisia: taxonomy, biology, damage, control and management, intercept. Andover, UK, pp 477–459

  • Sharaf N, Batta Y (1996) Effect of some factors on the relationship between the whitefly Bemisia tabaci Genn. (Homopt., Aleyrodidae) and the parasitoid Eretmocerus mundus Mercet (Hymenopt., Aphelinidae). Z Ang Ent 99:267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbaneja A, Stansly PA (2004) Host suitability of different instars of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci “biotype Q” for Eretmocerus mundus. BioControl 49:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulusoy R, Uygun N, Kersting U, Karaca I, Satar S (1996) Present status of citrus whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Turkey and their control. Z Pflanzenkr Pflanzenschutz 103:397–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams T, Polaszek A (1996) A re-examination of host relations in the Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Biol J Linn Soc 57:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge Prof. G. Viggiani (CNR, Ist Protez Piante, Sez Portici, Portici, I-80055 Italy) and Dr. J. L. Cenis (CIDA La Alberca, Murcia, Spain) for the parasitoid and whitefly identification. I appreciate the comments and review of the manuscript by Dr. Steve J. Castle and Dr. C. C. Chu (Western Cotton Research Laboratory, Phoenix, AZ). I also would like to thank Dr. Cengiz Kazak and Dr. M. Rifat Ulusoy (Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey) for their valuable suggestions on early version of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK-TOGTAG-3037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Protection, Çukurova University, Agricultural Faculty, 01330, Adana, Turkey

    Kamil Karut

Authors
  1. Kamil Karut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamil Karut.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karut, K. Host instar suitability of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) for the parasitoid Eretmocerus mundus (Hym.: Aphelinidae). J Pest Sci 80, 93–97 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-006-0157-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-006-0157-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation