Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in scanpath pattern and verbal working memory predicts efficient reading in the Cloze gap-filling test

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different tests measure text comprehension, including the cloze gap-filling test, often used for language learning. Different studies hypothesized cognitive strategies in this type of test and their relationship with working memory and performance. However, no study investigated the cloze test, working memory, and possible cognitive strategies, while performing the test. Therefore, this study aimed to identify cognitive visual strategies in the cloze test by applying an unsupervised algorithm and to analyze the relationship between these strategies with working memory and performance in the cloze test. Our sample consisted of 51 university students, the largest sample in studies of cognitive strategies with cloze tests. Participants answered an 11-item cloze test in a computer with eye-tracking, a verbal working memory test, and a visuospatial working memory test. Our analysis of participants’ scanpath identified two main strategies: one with fewer toggles between text and word bank and fewer fixations than the other one, indicating the existence of a global strategy. Furthermore, a model predicting the efficiency of participants in the cloze test found that item complexity, using a global strategy, and higher scores of working memory were the most significant predictors. These results confirm the hypothesis of a global strategy being related to successfully achieving higher-order reading processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Šimon Kucharský for publishing the algorithm’s code openly at https://osf.io/wvzs9/ and for answering our questions regarding the implementation of the algorithm. The text was partially crafted using GPT-3.5, OpenAI's extensive language-generation model. Following the generation of the draft, the author meticulously reviewed, edited, and refined the text according to personal preferences, assuming full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Funding

This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP; Grant Numbers: 2018/08069-3 and 2018/09654-7) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; grant number: 309159/2019-9).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo G. Laurence.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare relevant to this article’s content.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. The study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the University (CAAE 98599618.2.0000.0084).

Open practices

The study was preregistered in AsPredicted and can be accessed at https://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=az5nn3. The data and analysis code are available at https://osf.io/sgxkh/.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Editors: Valerio Santangelo (University of Perugia), Moreno I. Coco (Sapienza University of Rome); Reviewers: Elena Allegretti (Sapienza University of Rome), Dario Paape (University of Potsdam).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 216 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laurence, P.G., Bassetto, S.A., Bertolino, N.P. et al. Differences in scanpath pattern and verbal working memory predicts efficient reading in the Cloze gap-filling test. Cogn Process (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01189-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01189-x

Keywords

Navigation