Abstract
There is relative paucity in the comprehensive study of anger and information processing. Emotions can impact the depth of information processing and anger is a powerful high-certainty emotion. Yet, the magnitude of the effects of anger on the depth of information processing has not been summarized. This scholarship performs a meta-analytic synthesis to report the effect of anger on the depth of information processing as compared to one of the four contrast groups: neutral control, sadness, happiness, and fear. A systematic search identified 26 articles with a total of 39 unique studies and 113 effect sizes. The evaluation revealed that anger did not have a significant effect on depth of information processing for any of the emotional comparison groups. Furthermore, the presence of publication bias was only found for one analysis. These complex results indicate that anger is an exceedingly nuanced emotion. The implications of the study and future scholarship are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albarracin D, Kumkale GT (2003) Affect as information in persuasion: a model of affect identification and discounting. J Pers Soc Psychol 84(3):453
Albarracin D, Wyer RS Jr (2001) Elaborative and nonelaborative processing of a behavior-related communication. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27(6):691–705
Angie AD, Connelly S, Waples EP, Kligyte V (2011) The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Emot 25(8):1393–1422
Averill JR (1983) Studies on anger and aggression: implications for theories of emotion. Am Psychol 38(11):1145
Baas M, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA (2011) Creative production by angry people peaks early on, decreases over time, and is relatively unstructured. J Exp Soc Psychol 47(6):1107–1115
Baas M, de Dreu C, Nijstad BA (2012) Emotions that associate with uncertainty lead to structured ideation. Emotion 12(5):1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027358
Baron RS, Inman ML, Kao CF, Logan H (1992) Negative emotion and superficial social processing. Motivation Emotion 16(4):323–346
Baron RS, Logan H, Lilly J, Inman M, Brennan M (1994) Negative emotion and message processing. J Exp Soc Psychol 30(2):181–201
Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR (1997) Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 275(5304):1293–1295
Beck R, Fernandez E (1998) Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of anger: a meta-analysis. Cognitive Therapy Res 22(1):63–74. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018763902991
Bellur S, Sundar SS (2014) How can we tell when a heuristic has been used? Design and analysis strategies for capturing the operation of heuristics. Commun Methods Measures 8(2):116–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2014.903390
Bodenhausen GV, Kramer GP, Süsser K (1994a) Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. J Pers Soc Psychol 66(4):621
Bodenhausen GV, Sheppard LA, Kramer GP (1994b) Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. Euro J Soc Psychol 24(1):45–62
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgin JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis, Wiley
Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (1982) The need for cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol 42(1):116
Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(5):752
Chaiken S (1987) The heuristic model of persuasion. Social Influence: the ontario symposium 5:3–39. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=eGMAAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=chaiken+1987&ots=iwsiSBFvt1&sig=M8uwaYtqRqtv2amLiZFoxUnLsHo
Chaiken S, Eagly AH (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. Unintended Thought 212:212–252
Chaiken S, Trope Y (1999) Dual-process theories in social psychology, Guilford Press.
Chaimani A, Mavridis D, Salanti G (2014) A hands-on practical tutorial on performing meta-analysis with Stata. Evid Based Mental Health 17(4):111–116. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2014-101967
Chan ME, Arvey RD (2012) Meta-analysis and the development of knowledge. Perspectives Psychol Sci 7(1):79–92
Craik FI, Tulving E (1975) Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. J Exp Psychol 104(3):268
DeAndrea DC, Holbert RL (2017) Increasing clarity where it is needed most: articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. Ann Int Commun Assoc 41(2):168–180
Dillard JP, Shen L (2013) The Sage handbook of persuasion, Los Angeles, CA: Sage. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ye_Sun4/publication/288824491_When_presumed_influence_turns_real_An_indirect_route_of_media_influence/links/568412af08ae1975839377f9.pdf
Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 95(449):89–98
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634
Ekman P (2007) Emotions revealed: recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life (2nd edition), Holt Paperbacks.
Ferrer RA, Stanley JT, Graff K, Klein WMP, Goodman N, Nelson WL, Salazar S (2016) The effect of emotion on visual attention to information and decision making in the context of informed consent process for clinical trials. J Behav Decision Making 29(2–3):245–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1871
Flather MD, Farkouh ME, Pogue JM, Yusuf S (1997) Strengths and limitations of meta-analysis: larger studies may be more reliable. Control Clin Trials 18(6):568–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00024-X
Frijda NH (1986) The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction. Maison de Sciences de l’Homme, Paris
Glass GV (1976) Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 5(10):3–8
Green S, Higgins J (2018) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 6th ed, The Cochrane Collaboration. https://handbook.cochrane.org
Hale JL, Lemieux R, Mongeau PA (1995) Cognitive processing of fear-arousing message content. Commun Res 22(4):459–474
Harmon-Jones E, Gable PA, Price TF (2013) Does negative affect always narrow and positive affect always broaden the mind? Considering the influence of motivational intensity on cognitive scope. Curr Directions Psychol Sci 22(4):301–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413481353
Hart W, Albarracín D, Eagly AH, Brechan I, Lindberg MJ, Merrill L (2009) Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychol Bull 135(4):555–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015701
Hunter JE, Schmidt FL (2004) Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings, Sage.
Isbell LM, Rovenpor DR, Lair EC (2016) The impact of negative emotions on self-concept abstraction depends on accessible information processing styles. Emotion pdh. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000193
Jallais C, Gabaude C, Paire-ficout L (2014) When emotions disturb the localization of road elements: effects of anger and sadness. Trans Res Part F 23:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.023
Kim HJ, Cameron GT (2011) Emotions matter in crisis: the role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Commun Res 38(6):826–855 ufh
Kühne R, Schemer C (2015) The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Commun Res 42(3):387–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213514599
Kuppens P, Van Mechelen I, Smits DJ, De Boeck P, Ceulemans E (2007) Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience. Cogn Emot 21(4):689–713
Lazarus RS (1991) Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. Am Psychol 46(8):819–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819
Lerner JS, Keltner D (2000) Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cogn Emot 14(4):473–493
Lerner JS, Keltner D (2001) Fear, anger, and risk. J Pers Soc Psychol 81(1):146
Lerner JS, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam KS (2015) Emotion and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 66(1):799–823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
Lerner JS, Tiedens LZ (2006) Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. J Behav Decision Making 19(2):115–137
Matthes J, Heiss R (2019) Funny cats and politics: Do humorous context posts impede or foster the elaboration of news posts on social media? Commun Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219826006
Mechias M-L, Etkin A, Kalisch R (2010) A meta-analysis of instructed fear studies: Implications for conscious appraisal of threat. Neuroimage 49(2):1760–1768
Mitchell MM, Brown KM, Morris-Villagran M, Villagran PD (2001) The effects of anger, sadness and happiness on persuasive message processing: a test of the negative state relief model. Commun Monographs 68(4):347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128070psyh
Moons WG, Mackie DM (2007) Thinking straight while seeing red: the influence of anger on information processing. Personality Soc Psychol Bull 33(5):706–720 cmedm
Nabi RL (1999) A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Commun Theory 9(3):292–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
Nabi RL (2002) Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Commun Monographs 69(3):204–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750216541psyh
Nabi RL (2003) Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Commun Res 30(2):224–247
Nabi RL, Green MC (2015) The role of a narrative’s emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psychol 18(2):137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912585
Orth U, Wieland E (2006) Anger, hostility, and posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults: a meta-analysis. American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/ccp/74/4/698/
Ortony A, Clore GL, Collins A (1990). The cognitive structure of emotions, Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/psychology/cognition/cognitive-structure-emotions
Parker MT, Isbell LM (2010) How I vote depends on how I feel: the differential impact of anger and fear on political information processing. Psychol Sci 21(4):548–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610364006psyh
Petty RE, Briñol P, Loersch C, McCaslin MJ, Leary MR, Hoyle RH (2009) The need for cognition. Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior pp 318–329.
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In: Dual-process theories in social psychology, Guilford Press, pp 37–72, https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5X_auIBx99EC&oi=fnd&pg=PA41&dq=elaboration+likelihood+petty+wegener+current+status&ots=OIVS-U5lph&sig=iIskU1ChWZPoDZmAgUFQQwPfJGo
Semmler C, Brewer N (2002) Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments. Behav Sci Law 20(4):423–436
Smith CA, Ellsworth PC (1985) Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol 48(4):813
Stankowich T, Blumstein DT (2005) Fear in animals: A meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc R Soc Lond B 272(1581):2627–2634
Starfelt Sutton LC, White KM (2016) Predicting sun-protective intentions and behaviours using the theory of planned behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Health 31(11):1272–1292
Stearns CZ (1993) Sadness. In: Lewis M, Haviland JM (eds) Handbook of emotions, Guilford Press, pp. 547–561.
Stein NL, Levine LJ (1989) The causal organisation of emotional knowledge: a developmental study. Cogn Emot 3(4):343–378
Sterne JA, Egger M (2005) Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis, Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, pp 99–110
Sun Y, Pan Z, Shen L (2008) Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. J Commun 58(2):280–300
Švegar D, Kardum I, Polič M (2013) Happy face superiority effect in change detection paradigm. Psihologijske Teme/Psychol Topics 22(2):249–269 aph
Tiedens LZ, Linton S (2001) Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. J Pers Soc Psychol 81(6):973
Valentino NA, Hutchings VL, Banks AJ, Davis AK (2008) Is a worried citizen a good citizen? emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychol 29(2):247–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x
van Kleef GA (2014) Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it. Hum Relations 67(9):1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713510329
Walter N, Tukachinsky R, Pelled A, Nabi R (2018) Meta-analysis of anger and persuasion: an empirical integration of four models. J Commun 69(1):73–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy054
Weary G, Jacobson JA (1997) Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking. J Pers Soc Psychol 73(4):839
Weeks BE (2015) Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. J Commun 65(4):699–719
Wilson PH, McKenzie BE (1998) Information processing deficits associated with developmental coordination disorder: a meta-analysis of research findings. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 39(6):829–840
Witte K, Allen M (2000) A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav 27(5):591–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700506
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: Giulia Liberati (UC Louvain).
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reviewers: Shlomo Hareli (University of Haifa) and a second researcher who prefers to remain anonymous.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKasy, M. A discrete emotion with discrete effects: effects of anger on depth of information processing. Cogn Process 21, 555–573 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00982-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00982-8