Interventions aimed at overcoming intuitive interference: insights from brain-imaging and behavioral studies
Students experience difficulties in comparison tasks that may stem from interference of the tasks’ salient irrelevant variables. Here, we focus on the comparison of perimeters task, in which the area is the irrelevant salient variable. Studies have shown that in congruent trials (when there is no interference), accuracy is higher and reaction time is shorter than in incongruent trials (when the area variable interferes). Brain-imaging and behavioral studies suggested that interventions of either activating inhibitory control mechanisms or increasing the level of salience of the relevant perimeter variable could improve students’ success. In this review, we discuss several studies that empirically explored these possibilities and their findings show that both types of interventions improved students’ performance. Theoretical considerations and practical educational implications are discussed.
KeywordsIntuitive interference Comparison of perimeters Educational interventions Inhibitory control mechanisms fMRI
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bronowski J (1947) Mathematics. In: Thompson D, Reeves J (eds) The quality of education: methods and purposes in the secondary curriculum. Frederick Muller, London, pp 179–195Google Scholar
- Deliyianni E, Michael E, Pitta-Pantazi D (2006) The effect of different teaching tools in overcoming the impact of the intuitive rules. In: Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, vol 2, pp 409–416Google Scholar
- Fischbein H (1987) Intuition in science and mathematics: an educational approach. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Goldenberg M (2016) The effect of conflict teaching intervention on the accuracy and reaction time of comparing perimeters. Master’s dissertation, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (in Hebrew) Google Scholar
- Martin MO, Mullis IV, Foy P, Stanco GM (2012) TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Mullis IV, Martin MO, Foy P, Arora A (2012) TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2014) PISA 2012 results: what students know and can do: student performance in mathematics, reading and science (volume I). OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Stavy R, Tirosh D (2000) How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Tamsut E (2014) The effect of a preliminary task which strengthens the preservation of perimeter on the accuracy and reaction time of comparing perimeters. Master’s dissertation, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (in Hebrew) Google Scholar