Cognitive Processing

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 145–157 | Cite as

Cognitive dimensions of talim: evaluating weaving notation through cognitive dimensions (CDs) framework

  • Gagan Deep KaurEmail author
Research Report


The design process in Kashmiri carpet weaving is distributed over a number of actors and artifacts and is mediated by a weaving notation called talim. The script encodes entire design in practice-specific symbols. This encoded script is decoded and interpreted via design-specific conventions by weavers to weave the design embedded in it. The cognitive properties of this notational system are described in the paper employing cognitive dimensions (CDs) framework of Green (People and computers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989) and Blackwell et al. (Cognitive technology: instruments of mind—CT 2001, LNAI 2117, Springer, Berlin, 2001). After introduction to the practice, the design process is described in ‘The design process’ section which includes coding and decoding of talim. In ‘Cognitive dimensions of talim’ section, after briefly discussing CDs framework, the specific cognitive dimensions possessed by talim are described in detail.


Talim Cognitive dimensions Design process Kashmiri carpet weaving Carpet designing Graph 



I am thankful to National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS), Bengaluru, and its Consciousness Studies Programme for supporting this work and funding the fieldwork conducted during 2015. I am obliged to Ms. Aamina Assad, Chief Designer, School of Designs (SoD), Mr. Gazanfar Ali, the then Director, Directorate of Handicrafts—Massive Carpets Scheme (MCS), Mr. Zubair Ahmad, Director, Indian Institute of Carpet Technology (IICT), all in Srinagar, for facilitating my work at their respective institutions. The consent form used during 2015 was translated by Prof. Mushtak Haider, University of Kashmir. I am thankful to M/s BMW Designers and Sajad Nazir, Srinagar, for permitting me to reproduce the talim roll, a talim excerpt, graph and their respective designs in the paper whose copyright they hold. I am indebted to Prof. Siby George, IIT Bombay, for giving me feedback on the paper. I am grateful to all my respondents for giving me their invaluable time.


  1. Blackwell AF, Green TRG, Nunn DJE (2000) Cognitive dimensions and musical notation systems. Workshop on notation and music information retrieval in the computer age (ICMC 2000), BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackwell AF, Britton C, Cox A, Green TRG, Gurr C, Kadoda G, Kutar MS, Loomes M, Nehaniv CL, Petre M, Roast C, Roe C, Wong A, Young RM (2001) Cognitive dimensions of notations: design tools for cognitive technology. In: Beynon M, Nehaniv CL, Dautenhahn K (eds) Cognitive technology: instruments of mind - CT 2001, LNAI 2117. Springer, Berlin, pp 325–341Google Scholar
  3. Cox K (2000) Cognitive dimensions of use cases - feedback from a student questionnaire. In: Blackwell AF and Bilotta E (eds) Proceedings of Psychology of Programming Interest Group, (PPIG-12), CozenzaGoogle Scholar
  4. Dagit J, Lawrence J, Neumann C, Burnett M, Metoyer R, Adams S (2006) Using cognitive dimensions: advice from the trenches. J Vis Lang Comput 17(4):302–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dearden A, Siddiqi J, Naghsh A (2003) Using cognitive dimensions to compare prototyping techniques. In: Proceedings of 15th annual workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (PPIG 2003)Google Scholar
  6. Gans-Reudin E (1984) Indian carpets: with 280 illustrations, 120 in colour. Thames and Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Goswami KK (2009) Developments in handmade carpets: an introduction. In: Goswami KK (ed) Advances in carpet manufacture. Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Oxford, pp 138–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green TRG (1989) Cognitive dimensions of notations. In: Sutcliffe VA, Macaulay L (eds) People and computers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 443–460Google Scholar
  9. Green TRG (1999) Building and manipulating complex information structures: issues in prolog programming. In: Brna P, du Boulay B, Pain H (eds) Learning to build and comprehend complex information structures: prolog as a case study. Ablex Publishing, New york, pp 7–27Google Scholar
  10. Green TRG (2000) Instructions and descriptions: some cognitive aspects of programming and similar activities.In: Proceedings of working conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2000), ACM Press, New York, pp 21–28Google Scholar
  11. Green TRG, Blackwell AF (1998) Cognitive dimensions of information artefacts: a tutorial. Available online at
  12. Green TRG, Petre M (1996) Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a ‘cognitive dimensions’ framework. J Vis Lang Comput 7:131–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green TRG, Blandford AE, Church L, Roast CR, Clarke S (2006) Cognitive dimensions: achievements, new directions, and open questions. J Vis Lang Comput 17:328–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris P (1991) The Kashmir shawl: lessons in history and studies in technology. Ars Textrina 16:105–127Google Scholar
  15. Harris P (2000) Decoding the talim. Hali 110:82–83Google Scholar
  16. Harris P (2001) Kashmiri Shawl Survival. Textile Forum, No. 3 AugustGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris P (2003) Digital images in Kashmir shawl weaving. Complex Weav J 71Google Scholar
  18. Harris P (2007) An eighteenth century digital technology. Cahiers métiers d’art*Craft J 1(1). Available online at
  19. Hendry DG, Green TRG (1994) Creating, comprehending and explaining spreadsheets: a cognitive interpretation of what discretionary users think of the spreadsheet model. Int J Hum Comput Stud 40:1033–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hendry DG, Harper DJ (1996) An informal information-seeking environment. J Am Soc Inf Sci 48(11):1036–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kutar M, Britton C, Wilson J (2000) Cognitive dimensions – an experience report. In: Blackwell AF, Bilotta E (eds) Proceeding of the 12th annual meeting of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (PPIG 2000), Italy, pp 81–98Google Scholar
  22. Lawrence W (1895) The valley of Kashmir. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Leitner GW (1882) Linguistic fragments discovered in 1870, 1872 and 1879 relating to the dialect of the magadds, and other wandering tribes, the argots of thieves, the secret of trade-dialects and systems of native cryptography in Kabul, Kashmir and the Punjab followed by an account of shawl-weaving. Punjab Government Civil Secretariat Press, LahoreGoogle Scholar
  24. Mathur AR (2004) Indian carpets: a hand-knotted heritage. Rupa & Co., New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  25. Modungo F, Green TRG, Myers BA (1994) Visual programming in a visual domain: a case study of cognitive dimensions. In: Cockton G, Draper SW, Weir GRS (eds) Peoples and computers IX: proceedings of HCI’94. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91–108Google Scholar
  26. Moorcroft W, Trebeck G (1841) Travels in the Himalayan Provinces of Hindustan and the Punjab, Ladakh and Kashmir; in Peshawar, Kabul, Kunduz and Bokhara: From 1819 to 1825, vol 2. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Nash C (2015) The cognitive dimensions of music notations.In: International conference on technologies for music notation and representation (TENOR-2015), France, pp 191–203. Available online at
  28. Petre M, Green TRG (1992) Requirements of graphical notations for professional users: electronics CAD systems as a case study. Le Travail Humain 55(1):47–70Google Scholar
  29. Roy T (2004) Traditional industry in the economy of colonial india. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Sajnani M (2001) Encyclopaedia of Tourism Resources in India, Vol. 1.Gyan Publishing House, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  31. Saraf DN (1987) Arts and crafts, Jammu and Kashmir: land, people, culture. Abhinav Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  32. Shum S (1991) Cognitive dimensions of design rationale. In: Diaper D, Hammond NV (eds) People and computers VI: proceedings of HCI’91. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 331–344Google Scholar
  33. Stenning K, Oberlander J (1995) A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation. Cogn Sci 19(1):97–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tukianen M (2001) Evaluation of the cognitive dimensions questionnaire and some thoughts about the cognitive dimensions of spreadsheet calculation. In: Kadoda G (ed) Proceedings of 13th annual workshop on Psychology of Programming (PPIG-13), pp 291–301Google Scholar
  35. Whitley KN, Blackwell AF (1997) Visual programming: the outlook from academia and industry. In: Proceeding of ESP ‘97, 7th workshop on empirical studies of programmers, pp 180–208Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consciousness Studies ProgrammeNational Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)BengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations