Abstract
The memory alignment effect is the advantage of reasoning from a perspective which is aligned with the frame of reference used to encode an environment in memory. It usually occurs when participants have to consciously take a perspective to perform a spatial memory task. The present experiment assesses whether the memory alignment effect can occur without requiring to consciously take a given perspective, when the misaligned perspective is only perceptively provided. In others words, does the memory alignment effect still arise when it is only implicitly prompted? Thirty participants learned a sequence of four objects’ positions in a room from a north-as-up survey perspective. During the testing phase, they had to point to the direction of a target object from another object (‘the reference’) with a fixed north-up orientation. The background behind the reference object displayed either a uniform color (control condition) or a misaligned ground-level perspective. The latter displayed a reference object’s position information which was either congruent with the studied environment (congruent misaligned condition) or incongruent (incongruent misaligned condition). Mean pointing errors were higher in the congruent misaligned condition than in the control condition, whereas the incongruent misaligned condition did not differ from the control one. The present study shows that the memory alignment effect can arise without requiring a conscious misaligned perspective taking. Moreover, the perceived misaligned perspective must share the same spatial content as the memorized spatial representation in order to induce an alignment effect.
References
Avraamides MN, Kelly JW (2008) Multiple systems of spatial memory and action. Cogn Process 9:93–106
Burgess N (2006) Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends Cogn Sci 10:551–557
Byrne P, Becker S, Burgess N (2007) Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychol Rev 114:340–375
Diwadkar VA, McNamara TP (1997) Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychol Sci 8:302–307
Lee PU, Tversky B (2005) Interplay between visual and spatial: the effect of landmark descriptions on comprehension of route/survey spatial descriptions. Spat Cogn Comput 5:163–185
Mou W, McNamara TP, Valiquette CM, Rump B (2004) Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:142–157
Shelton AL, McNamara TP (2001) Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cogn Psychol 43:274–310
Shelton AL, McNamara TP (2004) Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:158–170
Shelton AL, Pippitt HA (2007) Fixed versus dynamic orientations in environmental learning from ground-level and aerial perspectives. Psychol Res 71:333–346
Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9:625–636
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cerles, M., Gomez, A. & Rousset, S. An implicit spatial memory alignment effect. Cogn Process 16 (Suppl 1), 179–183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0694-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0694-9