Abstract
We investigated familiarity and preference judgments of participants toward a novel musical system. We exposed participants to tone sequences generated from a novel pitch probability profile. Afterward, we either asked participants to identify more familiar or we asked participants to identify preferred tone sequences in a two-alternative forced-choice task. The task paired a tone sequence generated from the pitch probability profile they had been exposed to and a tone sequence generated from another pitch probability profile at three levels of distinctiveness. We found that participants identified tone sequences as more familiar if they were generated from the same pitch probability profile which they had been exposed to. However, participants did not prefer these tone sequences. We interpret this relationship between familiarity and preference to be consistent with an inverted U-shaped relationship between knowledge and affect. The fact that participants identified tone sequences as even more familiar if they were generated from the more distinctive (caricatured) version of the pitch probability profile which they had been exposed to suggests that the statistical learning of the pitch probability profile is involved in gaining of musical knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Berlyne DE (1974) The new experimental aesthetics. In: Berlyne DE (ed) Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: steps towards an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Hemisphere Publishing Co., Washington, pp 1–25
Cantor GN (1968) Children’s ‘‘like–dislike’’ ratings of familiarized and unfamiliarized visual stimuli. J Exp Child Psychol 6:651–657
Huron (2006) Sweet anticipation. MIT Press, Cambridge
Huron D, Veltman J (2006) A cognitive approach to medieval mode: evidence for an historical antecedent to the major/minor system. Empir Musicol Rev 1:33–55
Krumhansl CL (1985) Perceiving tonal structure in music. Am Sci 73:371–378
Krumhansl CL (1990) Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford University Press, New York
Krumhansl CL, Cuddy LL (2010) A theory of tonal hierarchies in music. In: Jones MR, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Music perception. Springer, New York, pp 51–87
Kuhn G, Dienes Z (2005) Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: implicitly learning more than chunks. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:1417–1432
Loui P, Wessel DL, Hudson Kam CL (2010) Humans rapidly learn grammatical structure in a new musical scale. Music Percept 27:327–377
Martindale C, Moore K (1989) Relationship of musical preference to collative, ecological, and psychophysical variables. Music Percept 6:431–445
Martindale C, Moore K, Borkum J (1990) Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne’s psychobiological theory. Am J Psychol 105:53–80
Meyer LB (1956) Emotion and meaning in music. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Peretz I, Gaudreau D, Bonnel AM (1998) Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Mem Cognit 26:884–902
Schellenberg EG, Peretz I, Vieillard S (2008) Liking for happy-and sad-sounding music: effects of exposure. Cogn Emot 22:218–237
Seamon JG, Williams PC, Crowley MJ, Kim IJ, Langer SA, Orne PJ, Wishengrad DL (1995) The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21:711–721
Smith JD, Melara RJ (1990) Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: T is the gift to be simple. Cognition 34:279–298
Smith NA, Schmuckler MA (2004) The perception of tonal structure through the differentiation and organization of pitches. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:268–286
Szpunar KK, Schellenberg EG, Pliner P (2004) Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:370–381
Temperley D (2007) Music and probability. MIT Press, Cambridge
Tillmann B, Bharucha JJ, Bigand E (2000) Implicit learning of tonality: a self-organizing approach. Psychol Rev 107:885–913
Zajonc RB (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J Pers Soc Psychol 9:1–27
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada to LLC. We would like to thank four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cui, AX., Collett, M.J., Troje, N.F. et al. Familiarity and preference for pitch probability profiles. Cogn Process 16, 211–218 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0651-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0651-7