Are judgments for action verbs and point-light human actions equivalent?
- 224 Downloads
The aim of the present study was to examine whether the ability to judge action words and the ability to judge human actions share common mechanisms. With this purpose in mind, we proposed both a lexical and an action decision task to twenty-four healthy participants. For both tasks, the participants had to judge whether the stimulus that was presented (a letter string or a point-light sequence) was valid or not (i.e. a word vs. a pseudo-word, an action vs. a pseudo-action). The data analysis showed that the action decision task has common characteristics with the lexical decision task. As for verbal material, judgements of pseudo-actions were slower than judgements for actions. Moreover, we demonstrated that the ability to judge an action verb was positively correlated with the ability to judge a point-light human action, whereas no significant correlation appeared between nouns and point-light judgements abilities. This dissociation supports the argument that the judgement of action words and the judgement of human actions share a common but specific basis through the involvement of motor representations.
KeywordsAction words Judgement ability Point-light human actions Sensorimotor representations
We thank Mathilde Vinel, who helped us to build the stimuli and recruit the participants and Arnaud Badets for his helpful comments.
- Aravena P, Hurtado E, Riveros R, Cardona JF, Manes F, Ibanez A (2010) Applauding with closed hands: neural signature of action-sentence compatibility effects. [Clinical Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. PLoS One 5(7):e11751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011751 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. [Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S. Review]. Behav Brain Sci 22(4): 577–609; Discussion 610–560Google Scholar
- Bidet-Ildei C, Méary D, Orliaguet, JP (2006) Visual perception of elliptic movements in 7-to-11 year old children: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Curr psychol Lett 2(19):2–9Google Scholar
- Cardona JF, Gershanik O, Gelormini-Lezama C, Houck AL, Cardona S, Kargieman L, Ibanez A (2013) Action-verb processing in Parkinson’s disease: new pathways for motor-language coupling. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review]. Brain Struct Funct 218(6):1355–1373. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0510-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coello Y, Bidet-Ildei C (2012) Motor representation and language in space, object, and movement perception. In: Coello Y, Bartolo A (eds) Language and action in cognitive neuroscience. Psychology Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gilaie-Dotan, S., Bentin, S., Harel, M., Rees, G., & Saygin, A. P. (2011). Normal form from biological motion despite impaired ventral stream function. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Neuropsychologia 49(5): 1033–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.009
- Goodale MA (1998) Vision for perception and vision for action in the primate brain. [Review]. Novartis Found Symp 218: 21–34; Discussion 34–29Google Scholar
- Ibanez A, Cardona JF, Dos Santos YV, Blenkmann A, Aravena P, Roca M,… Bekinschtein T (2013) Motor-language coupling: direct evidence from early Parkinson’s disease and intracranial cortical recordings. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S.]. Cortex 49(4): 968–984. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.02.014
- Lin N, Lu X, Fang F, Han Z, Bi Y (2011) Is the semantic category effect in the lateral temporal cortex due to motion property differences? [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Neuroimage 55(4): 1853–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.039
- New B, Pallier C, Ferrand L, Matos R (2001) Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L’Année psychologique 101:447–462. http://www.lexique.org
- Shipley TF, Brumberg JS (2005) Markerless motion-capture for point-light displays Available at http://astro.temple.edu/~tshipley/mocap/MarkerlessMoCap.pdf
- Springer A, Prinz W (2010). Action semantics modulate action prediction. Q J Exp Psychol (Colchester) 63(11):2141–2158. doi: 10.1080/17470211003721659