Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Acquisition of spatial knowledge in different urban areas: evidence from a survey analysis of adolescents

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We herein explore the perception of the geographic environment and analyse the mechanisms that constrain the cognitive processing of spatial information in general. Our guiding theoretical background assumption is that the structure of the spatial environment is a cognitively robust and mutually constrained threefold system relating (1) cognitive topology (comprised of a path and place structure of spatial information and constrained by reference frame-based factors), (2) experience-based functional knowledge (including the effects of socio-economic factors, frequency and familiarity) and (3) linguistic representations (primarily encoded in the prepositional system of a natural language). Here, we focus on (2), i.e. the effect of functional knowledge on the process of acquiring spatial knowledge. We empirically tested adolescents aged 12–17 years to explore the interaction between frequency, familiarity and functional knowledge from a developmental point of view. The social factors we explore are precisely defined and parameterized in our results (exposure to a particular urban area, place of residence, gender, age and factors relating to the environmental and social quality of the local area). Our research shows that there are divergences between the so-called objective topology and the cognitive typology of the urban environment that are significantly constrained by intensity of interactions with environment, number of functionally significant places within particular area and age from a developmental perspective in terms of spatial knowledge acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew J (1987) Place and politics: the geographical mediation of state and society. Allen & Unwin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard D (1973) Notes on urban perception and knowledge. In: Downs R, Stea D (eds) Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Aldine, Chicago, pp 109–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragones JI, Arredondo JM (1985) Structure of urban cognitive maps. J Environ Psychol 5:197–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaut JM, Stea D (1971) Studies of geographic learning. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 61:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaut JM, Stea D, Spencer C, Blades M (2003) Mapping as a cultural and cognitive universal. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93:165–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H, Golledge RG, Gale N, Tobler W (1987) Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. J Environ Psychol 7:99–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coventry KR, Garrod SC (2004) Saying, seeing and acting: the psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coventry KR, Lynott D, Cangelosi A, Monrouxe L, Joyce D, Richardson DC (2010) Spatial language, visual attention, and perceptual simulation. Brain Lang 112:202–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell T (2004) Place: short introduction. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs R, Stea D (1973) Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Mira R, Goluboff M (2005) The perception of urban space from two different viewpoints: pedestrians and automobile passengers. In: Garcia-Mira R, Uzzell DL, Real JE, Romay J (eds) Housing, space and quality of life. Antony Rowe Ltd., Chippenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge RG (1978) Learning about urban environments. In: Carlstein T, Parkes D, Thrift N (eds) Timing space and spacing time: making sense of time, vol 1. Edward Arnold, London, pp 76–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge RG (1999) Human wayWnding and cognitive maps. In: Golledge RG (ed) Wayfinding behavior: cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimor, pp 5–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge RG, Spector AN (1978) Comprehending the urban environment: theory and practice. Geogr Anal 10:403–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golledge RG, Stimson RJ (1997) The spatial behaviour: a geographical perspective. The Gilfourd Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge RG, Smith T, Pellegrino JW, Doherty S, Marshall SP (1985) A conceptual model and empirical analysis of children’s acquisition of spatial knowledge. J Environ Psychol 5:125–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golledge RG, Ruggles AJ, Pelegrino JW, Gales ND (1993) Integrating route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood along and across route experiments. J Environ Psychol 13:293–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen NL (1982) Spatial exploration and spatial knowledge: individual and developmental differences in very young children. Child Dev 53:826–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen NL, Lockman JJ, Pick HL Jr (1978) The development of children’s representations of large-scale environments. Child Dev 49:623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits A (1986) Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (2002) A theory of the city as object: or, how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space. Urban Des Int 7:153–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (2012) Studying cities to learn about minds: some possible implications of space syntax for spatial cognition. Environ Plann B 39:12–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau B, Jackendoff R (1993) “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behav Brain Sci 16:217–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG, Philbeck JW (1999) Human navigation by path integration. In: Golledge RG (ed) Wayfinding behavior: cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimor, pp 125–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch K (1960) The image of the city. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox KB, Rapp DN, Brion S, Taylor HA (2008) Social influences on spatial memory. Mem Cogn 36:479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makinen K, Tyrvainen L (2008) Teenage experiences of public green spaces in suburban Helsinki. Urban For Urban Green 7:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews MH (1987) Gender, home range and environmental cognition. Trans Inst Br Geogr 12:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews MH (1992) Making sense of place: Children’s understanding of large-scale environments. Barnes & Nobles Books, Savage

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR (1998) A new framework for understanding the acquisition of spatial knowledge in large-scale environments. In: Egenhofer MJ, Golledge RG (eds) Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 143–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR, Sas C (2006) Human factors of watfinding in navigation. In: Karwowski W (ed) International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Ltd, London, pp 2003–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman EL, Caplan JB, Kirschen MP, Korolev IO, Sekuler R, Kahana MJ (2007) Learning your way around town: how virtual taxicab drivers learn to use both layout and landmark information. Cognition 104:231–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien M, Jones D, Sloan D, Rustin M (2000) Children’s independent spatial mobility in the urban public realm. Childhood 7:257–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J, Inhelder B (1967) The child’s conception of cpace. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Portugali J (2011) Complexity, cognition and the city. Springer, Hedelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riga City Council (2008) Statistical materials of Riga City Council City Development Departament. Riga City Council City Development Departament, Riga

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissotto A, Giuliani MV (2006) Learning neighborhood environments: the loss of experience in modern world. In: Spencer C, Blades M (eds) Children and their environments: learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 75–90

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rissotto A, Tonucci F (2002) Freedom of movement and environmental knowledge in elementary school children. J Environ Psychol 22:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley D (1995) Geographies of exclusion: society and difference in West. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel AW, White SH (1975) The development of spatial representations of largescale environments. In: Reese HW (ed) Advances in child development and behavior, vol 10. Academic Press, New York, pp 9–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens Q (2006) The shape of urban experience: a reevaluation of Lynch’s five elements. Environ Plann B 33:803–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor HA, Wang Q, Gagnon SA, Maddox KB, Brunyé TT (2011) The social connection in mental representations of space: explicit and implicit evidence. In: Egenhofer M et al (eds) COSIT 2011, LNCS 6899. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Y-F (1975) Images and mental maps. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 65:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Y-F (1977) Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrvainen L, Makinen K, Schipperijn J (2007) Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 79:5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller D, Loomis JM, Steck SD (2003) Inertial cues do not enhance knowledge of environmental layout. Psychon B Rev 10:987–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang RF, Spelke ES (2000) Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition 77:215–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang RF, Spelke ES (2002) Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends Cogn Sci 6:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yaski O, Portugali J, Eilam D (2011) City rats: insight from rat spatial behavior into human cognitionin urban environments. Anim Cogn 14:655–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts J (2005) Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguist Philos 28:739–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was promoted with support of the European Union Social Fund project ‘Support of Doctoral Studies at the University of Latvia’, Project No. 2009/0138/1DP/1.1.2.1.2/09/IPIA/VIAA/. Jurģis Šķilters’ work is supported by the Fulbright Scholar Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia, Alberta Street 10, Riga, 1010, Latvia

    Ģirts Burgmanis & Zaiga Krišjāne

  2. Center for Cognitive Sciences and Semantics, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia

    Jurģis Šķilters

Authors
  1. Ģirts Burgmanis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zaiga Krišjāne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jurģis Šķilters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ģirts Burgmanis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burgmanis, Ģ., Krišjāne, Z. & Šķilters, J. Acquisition of spatial knowledge in different urban areas: evidence from a survey analysis of adolescents. Cogn Process 15, 373–383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0607-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0607-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation