Cognitive Processing

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 293–299 | Cite as

“Avoiding or approaching eyes”? Introversion/extraversion affects the gaze-cueing effect

  • Marta Ponari
  • Luigi TrojanoEmail author
  • Dario Grossi
  • Massimiliano ConsonEmail author
Research Report


We investigated whether the extra-/introversion personality dimension can influence processing of others’ eye gaze direction and emotional facial expression during a target detection task. On the basis of previous evidence showing that self-reported trait anxiety can affect gaze-cueing with emotional faces, we also verified whether trait anxiety can modulate the influence of intro-/extraversion on behavioral performance. Fearful, happy, angry or neutral faces, with either direct or averted gaze, were presented before the target appeared in spatial locations congruent or incongruent with stimuli’s eye gaze direction. Results showed a significant influence of intra-/extraversion dimension on gaze-cueing effect for angry, happy, and neutral faces with averted gaze. Introverts did not show the gaze congruency effect when viewing angry expressions, but did so with happy and neutral faces; extraverts showed the opposite pattern. Importantly, the influence of intro-/extraversion on gaze-cueing was not mediated by trait anxiety. These findings demonstrated that personality differences can shape processing of interactions between relevant social signals.


Emotional facial expressions Gaze-cueing Personality Introversion and extraversion Attention 


  1. Adams RB, Kleck RE (2003) Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion. Psychol Sci 14:644–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams RB, Gordon HL, Baird AA, Ambady N, Kleck RE (2003) Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces. Science 300:1536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayliss AP, di Pellegrino G, Tipper SP (2005) Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 58:631–650Google Scholar
  5. Canli T, Sivers H, Whitfield SL, Gotlib IH, Gabrieli JD (2002) Amygdala response to happy faces as a function of extraversion. Science 296:2191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Borgogni L, Perugini M (1993) The big five questionnaire: a new questionnaire to assess the five factor model. Pers Individ Dif 15:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cristinzio C, N’Diaye K, Seeck M, Vuilleumier P, Sander D (2010) Integration of gaze direction and facial expression in patients with unilateral amygdala damage. Brain 133:248–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalton KM, Nacewicz BM, Johnstone T, Schaefer HS, Gernsbacher MA, Goldsmith HH, Alexander AL, Davidson RJ (2005) Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. Nat Neurosci 8:519–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1976) Pictures of facial affect series. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. Eysenck HJ (1967) The biological basis of personality. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, ILGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox E, Mathews A, Calder AJ, Yiend J (2007) Anxiety and sensitivity to gaze direction in emotionally expressive faces. Emotion 7:478–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frischen A, Bayliss AP, Tipper SP (2007) Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychol Bull 133:694–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ganel T, Goshen-gottstein Y, Goodale MA (2005) Interactions between the processing of gaze direction and facial expression. Vis Res 45:1191–1200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hadjikhani N, Hoge R, Snyder J, de Gelder B (2008) Pointing with the eyes: the role of gaze in communicating danger. Brain Cogn 68:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hietanen JK, Leppänen JM (2003) Does facial expression affect attention orienting by gaze direction cues? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:1228–1243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horley K, Williams LM, Gonsalvez C, Gordon E (2003) Social phobics do not see eye to eye: a visual scanpath study of emotional expression processing. J Anxiety Disord 17:33–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horley K, Williams LM, Gonsalvez C, Gordon E (2004) Face to face: visual scanpath evidence for abnormal processing of facial expressions in social phobia. Psychiatry Res 127:43–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Janowsky DS, Morter S, Tancer M (2000) Over-representation of Myers Briggs Type Indicator introversion in social phobia patients. Depress Anxiety 11:121–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mathews AM, Fox E, Yiend J, Calder A (2003) The face of fear: effects of eye-gaze and emotion on visual attention. Vis Cogn 10:823–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moukheiber A, Rautureau G, Perez-Diaz F, Soussignan R, Dubal S, Jouvent R, Pelissolo A (2010) Gaze avoidance in social phobia: objective e measure and correlates. Behav Res Ther 48:147–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mumenthaler C, Sander D (2012) Social appraisal influences recognition of emotions. J Pers Soc Psychol 102:1118–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. N’Diaye K, Sander D, Vuilleumier P (2009) Self-relevance processing in the human amygdala: gaze direction, facial expression, and emotion intensity. Emotion 9:798–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Öhman A (1986) Face the beast and fear the face: animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion. Psychophysiology 23:123–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Putman P, Hermans E, Van Honk J (2006) Anxiety meets fear in perception of dynamic expressive gaze. Emotion 6:94–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Richards A, French CC (1991) Effects on encoding and anxiety on implicit and explicit memory performance. Pers Individ Dif 12:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sander D, Grafman J, Zalla T (2003) The human amygdala: an evolved system for relevance detection. Rev Neurosci 14:303–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwerdtfeger A (2006) Trait anxiety and autonomic indicators of the processing of threatening information: a cued S1–S2 paradigm. Biol Psychol 72:59–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spielberg CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (self-evaluation questionnaire). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA (Italian ed. 1989)Google Scholar
  29. Stein MB, Goldin PR, Sareen J, Zorrilla LT, Brown GG (2002) Increased amygdala activation to angry and contemptuous faces in generalized social phobia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:1027–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of PsychologySecond University of NaplesCasertaItaly
  2. 2.Division of Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity College of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Salvatore Maugeri FoundationIRCCS, Scientific Institute of Telese Terme (BN)Telese TermeItaly

Personalised recommendations