The spatial thinking of origami: evidence from think-aloud protocols

Abstract

Origami, the ancient Japanese art of paper folding, involves spatial thinking to both interpret and carry out its instructions. As such, it has the potential to provide spatial training (Taylor and Hutton under review). The present work uses cognitive discourse analysis to reveal the spatial thinking involved in origami and to suggest how it may be beneficial for spatial training. Analysis of think-aloud data while participants folded origami and its relation to gender, spatial ability measures, and thinking style suggest that one way that people profit from spatial training is through the possibility to verbalize concepts needed to solve-related spatial tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Atit K, Shipley TF, Tikoff B (in press) Twisting space: are rigid and non-rigid mental transformations separate spatial skills? Cogn Process

  2. Casey MB, Nuttall RL, Pezaris E (1997) Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: a comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Dev Psychol 33:669–680

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen CA, Hegarty M (2012) Inferring cross sections of 3D objects: a new spatial thinking test. Learn Individ Differ 22:868–874

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coleman SL, Gotch AJ (1998) Spatial perception skills of chemistry students. J Chem Educ 75:206–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris J, Hirsh-Pasek K, Newcombe NS (2013) Understanding spatial transformations: similarities and differences between mental rotation and mental folding. Cogn Process. doi:10.1007/s10339-013-0544-6

  6. Hegarty M, Crookes RD, Dara-Abrams D, Shipley T. F (2010) Do all science disciplines rely on spatial abilities? Preliminary evidence from self-report questionnaires. In: Hölscher C, Shipley TF, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Bateman JA, Newcombe NS (eds) Spatial cognition VII. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 85–94

  7. Keehner MM, Tendick F, Meng MV, Anwar HP, Hegarty M, Stoller ML, Duh Q (2004) Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. Am J Surg 188:71–75

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lupyan G (2008) The conceptual grouping effect: categories matter (and named categories matter more). Cognition 108(2):566–577

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. NRC (2006) Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orion N, Ben-Chaim D, Kali Y (1997) Relationship between earth-science education and spatial visualization. J Geosci Educ 45:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peters M, Chisholm P, Laeng B (1995a) Spatial ability, student gender, and academic performance. J Eng Educ 84:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C (1995b) A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn 28:39–58

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shepard RN, Feng C (1972) A chronometric study of mental paper folding. Cogn Psychol 3(2):228–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sorby SA (2001) A course in spatial visualization and its impact on the retention of female engineering students. J Women Minor Sci Eng 7:153–172

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor HA, Hutton A (under review) Think3d! Training spatial thinking fundamental to STEM education

  16. Tenbrink T (2008) CODA: a method for investigating language expressing cognitive processes. Workshop on linguistic methodology: traditional and new approaches. Paper presented at the ISLE 2008, first triennial conference of the international society for the linguistics of English, Freiburg, Germany

  17. Uttal DH, Meadow NG, Tipton E, Hand LL, Alden AR, Warren C, Newcombe NS (2012) The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychol Bull. doi:10.1037/a0028446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly A. Taylor.

Additional information

This article is part of the special issue on “Spatial Learning and Reasoning Processes”, guest-edited by Thomas F. Shipley, Dedre Gentner and Nora S. Newcombe. Handling editor of this manuscript: Thomas F. Shipley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, H.A., Tenbrink, T. The spatial thinking of origami: evidence from think-aloud protocols. Cogn Process 14, 189–191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0540-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spatial thinking
  • Think aloud
  • Cognitive discourse analysis
  • Origami