Abstract
The notion of a mental time-line (i.e., past corresponds to left and future corresponds to right) supports the conceptual metaphor view assuming that abstract concepts like “time” are grounded in cognitively more accessible concepts like “space.” In five experiments, we further investigated the relationship between temporal and spatial representations and examined whether or not the spatial correspondents of time are unintentionally activated. We employed a priming paradigm, in which visual or auditory prime words (i.e., temporal adverbs such as yesterday, tomorrow) preceded a colored square. In all experiments, participants discriminated the color of this square by responding with the left or the right hand. Although the temporal reference of the priming adverb was task irrelevant in Experiment 1, visually presented primes facilitated responses to the square in correspondence with the direction of the mental time-line. This priming effect was absent in Experiments 2, 3, and 5, in which the primes were presented auditorily and the temporal reference of the words could be ignored. The effect, however, emerged when attention was oriented to the temporal content of the auditory prime words in Experiment 4. The results suggest that task demands differentially modulate the activation of the mental time-line within the visual and auditory modality and support a flexible association between conceptual codes.
References
Abe S (1935) Experimental study on the co-relation between space and time. Tohoku Psychol Folia 3:53–68
Anderson JR (1983) The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22:577–660
Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:617–645
Benussi V (1913) Versuche zur Analyse taktil erweckter Scheinbewegungen [Attempts at analyzing apparent motion induced by tactile stimulation]. Arch Gesamte Psychol 36:58–135
Bonato M, Zorzi M, Umiltá C (2012) When time is space: evidence for a mental time line. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:2257–2273
Boroditsky L (2000) Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75:1–28
Boroditsky L, Fuhrman O, McCormick K (2010) Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition 118:123–129
Casasanto D, Boroditsky L (2008) Time in the mind: using space to think about time. Cognition 106:579–593
Collyer CE (1977) Discrimination of spatial and temporal intervals defined by three light flashes: effects of spacing on temporal judgments and of timing on spatial judgments. Percept Psychophys 21:357–364
Coltheart M (1978) Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In: Underwood G (ed) Strategies of information processing. Academic Press, London
Correa Á, Lupiáñez J, Madrid E, Tudela P (2006) Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Res 1076:116–128
Cousineau D (2007) Confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 1:42–45
Fuhrman O, Boroditsky L (2010) Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cogn Sci 34:1430–1451
Fuhrman O, McCormick K, Chen E, Jiang H, Shu D, Moa S, Boroditsky L (2011) How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cogn Sci 35:1305–1328
Glenberg AM (1997) What memory is for. Behav Brain Sci 20:1–55
Harmon-Jones E, Peterson CK (2009) Supine body position reduces neural response to anger evocation. Psychol Sci 20:1209–1210
Heil M, Rösler F, Hennighausen E (1997) Topography of brain electrical activity dissociates the retrieval of spatial versus verbal information from episodic long-term memory in humans. Neurosci Lett 222:45–48
Ishihara M, Keller PE, Rossetti Y, Prinz W (2008) Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex 44:454–461
Kiefer M (2005) Repetition priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems. J Cogn Neurosci 17:199–211
Kintsch W (1998) Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York
Kong F, You X (2012) Space-time compatibility effects in the auditory modality. Exp Psychol 59:82–87
Kosslyn SM (1975) Information representation in visual images. Cogn Psychol 7:341–370
Kosslyn SM (1980) Image and mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Lakens D, Semin GR, Garrido MV (2011) The sound of time: cross-modal convergence in the spatial structuring of time. Conscious Cogn 20:437–443
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books, New York
Marcel AJ (1983) Conscious and unconscious perception: experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cogn Psychol 15:197–237
Meier BP, Robinson MD (2004) Why the sunny side is up: associations between affect and vertical position. Psychol Sci 15:243–247
Murphy G (1996) On metaphoric representation. Cognition 60:173–204
Otsuka S, Kawaguchi J (2007) Divided attention modulates semantic activation: evidence from a nonletter-level prime task. Mem Cogn 35:2001–2011
Ouellet M, Santiago J, Funes MJ, Lupiáñez J (2010a) Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:17–24
Ouellet M, Santiago J, Israeli Z, Gabay S (2010b) Is the future the right time? Exp Psychol 4:308–314
Ouellet M, Román A, Santiago J (2012) A multisensory interaction effect in the conceptual realm of time. Exp Psychol 59:236–242
Posner MI, Snyder CR (1975) Attention and cognitive control. In: Solso RL (ed) Information processing and cognition: the Loyola symposium. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 55–85
Santiago J, Lupiáñez J, Pérez E, Funes MJ (2007) Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychon Bull Rev 14:512–516
Santiago J, Román A, Ouellet M (2011) Flexible foundations of abstract thought: a review and a theory. In: Maas A, Schubert T (eds) Spatial dimensions of social thought. de Gruyter Mouton, Leipzig, pp 39–108
Santiago J, Ouellet M, Román A, Valenzuela J (2012) Attentional factors in conceptual congruency. Cogn Sci 36:1051–1077
Sarrazin JC, Giraudo MD, Pailhous J, Bootsma RJ (2004) Dynamics of balancing space and time in memory: tau and kappa effects revisited. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:411–430
Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171:701–703
Simmons WK, Ramjee V, Beauchamp MS, McRae K, Martin A, Barsalou LW (2007) Common neural substrates for perceiving and knowing about color and action. Neuropsychologia 45:2802–2810
Simon JR, Rudell AP (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51:300–304
Strack F, Martin LL, Stepper S (1988) Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:768–777
Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:243–245
Torralbo A, Santiago J, Lupiáñez J (2006) Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cogn Sci 30:745–757
Tversky B, Kugelmass S, Winter A (1991) Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cogn Psychol 23:515–557
Vallesi A, Binns M, Shallice T (2008) An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time. Cognition 107:501–527
Vallesi A, McIntosh AR, Stuss DT (2011) How time modulates spatial responses. Cortex 47:148–156
Weger U, Pratt J (2008) Time flies like an arrow: spacetime compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychon Bull Rev 15:426–430
Wells GL, Petty RE (1980) The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 1:219–230
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (SFB 833, project B2), by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), and by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Subprograma de Acciones Integradas, DE-0040/2009) and Ministerio de Educación (Programa FPU). We thank Juan Lupiáñez, Steve Tipper, Marc Ouellet, and other anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rolke, B., Fernández, S.R., Schmid, M. et al. Priming the mental time-line: effects of modality and processing mode. Cogn Process 14, 231–244 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0537-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0537-5