Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the user’s reactions to received suggestion by an Embodied Conversational Agent playing the role of artificial therapist in the healthy eating domain. Specifically, we analyse the behaviour of people who voluntarily requested to receive information from the agent, and we compare it with the results of a previous evaluation experiment in which subjects were not properly motivated to interact with the agent because they were selected for evaluating the system. This study is part of an ongoing research aimed at developing an intelligent virtual agent that applies natural argumentation techniques to persuade the users to improve their eating habits.
References
Andersen PA, Guerrero LK (1998) Handbook of communication and emotions. Research, theory, applications and contexts. Academic Press, New York
Austin JL (1962) How to do things with words, 2nd edn, 2005. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)—Paperback
Bickmore T (2003) Relational agents: effecting change through human-computer relationships. PhD Thesis, Media Arts & Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Bickmore T, Cassell J (2005) Social dialogue with embodied conversational agents. In: van Kuppevelt J, Dybkjaer L, Bernsen N (eds) Advances in natural, multimodal dialogue systems. Kluwer Academic, New York
Cassell J, Joseph S, Sott P, Churchill E (2000) Embodied conversational agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0-262-03278-3
Clarizio G, Mazzotta I, Novielli N, de Rosis F (2006) Social attitude towards a conversational character. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication
Cohen PR, Levesque HJ (1990) Intention is choice with commitment. Artif Intell 42:213–261
Dahlback N, Joensson A, Ahrenberg L (1993) Wizard of Oz studies: why and how. In: Proceedings ACM international workshop on intelligent user interfaces. ACM Press, New York, pp 193–200
Darves C, Oviatt S (2002) Adaptation of users’ spoken dialogue patterns in a conversational interface. In: Hansen J, Pellom B (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international conference on spoken language processing (ICSLP2002)
de Rosis F, Novielli N, Carofiglio V, Cavalluzzi A, De Carolis B (2006) User modeling and adaptation in health promotion dialogs with an animated character. J Biomed Inform, Special Issue on ‘Dialog systems for health communications’ 39(5):514–531
de Rosis F, Batliner A, Novielli N, Steidl S (2007) ‘You are Sooo cool, valentina!’ recognizing social attitude in speech-based dialogues with an ECA. In: Paiva A, Picard R, Prada R (eds) Affective computing and intelligent interaction, springer LNCS 4738, pp 179–190. ISBN 978-3-540-74888-5, ISSN: 0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_17
Gill AJ, Oberlander J (2002) Taking care of the linguistic features of extraversion. In: Gray W, Schunn C (eds) Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the cognitive science society, pp 363–368
Graesser A, Wiemer-Hastings P, Wiemer-Hastings K, Harter ND, Person, the Tutoring Research Group (2000) Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interact Learn Environ 8(2):129–147
Kibble R (2006) Dialectical text planning. In: Proceedings of CMNA 2006. In the scope of ECAI
Landauer TK, Dumais ST (1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psycholog Rev 104:211–240
Mann WC, Matthiesen CM, Thompson SA (1989) Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. Information Sciences Institute Research Report, pp 89–242, ISI/RR-89-242
Marsella SC, Johnson WL, La Bore CM (2003) Interactive pedagogical drama for health interventions. In: Hoppe U (ed) Artificial intelligence in education: shaping the future of learning through intelligent technologies. Amsterdam, IOS Press, pp 341–348
Mazzotta I, Novielli N, Silvestri V, de Rosis F (2007a) ‘O Francesca, ma che sei grulla?’ Emotions and irony in persuasion dialogues. In: Basili R, Pazienza MT (eds) Proceedings of the 10th congress of the Italian association for artificial intelligence on AI*IA 2007: artificial intelligence and human-oriented computing (AI*IA ‘07). Springer, Berlin, pp 602–613
Mazzotta I, de Rosis F, Carofiglio V (2007b) Portia: a user-adapted persuasion system in the healthy-eating domain. IEEE Intell Syst 22(6):42–51. ISSN:1541-1672
Miceli M, de Rosis F, Poggi I (2006) Emotional and non emotional persuasion. Appl Artif Intell Int J 20(10):849–880
Nass C, Isbister K, Lee EJ (2000) Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents. In: Cassell J, Prevost S, Sullivan J, Churchill E (eds) Embodied conversational agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 374–402
Novielli N, Strapparava C (2010) Exploring the lexical semantics of dialogue acts. J Comput Linguist Appl 1(1-2):9–26 ISSN 0976-0962
Novielli N, de Rosis F, Mazzotta I (2010) User attitude towards an embodied conversational agent: effects of the interaction mode. J Pragmat 42(9):2385–2397. ISSN: 0378-2166
O’Keefe DJ (2002) Persuasion: theory and research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc., Beverly Hills
Oviatt S, Adams B (2001) Designing and evaluating conversational interfaces with animated characters. In: Embodied conversational agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 319–345
Oviatt SL, Cohen PR, Wang M (1994) Towards interface design for human language technology: modality and structure as determinants of linguistic complexity. Speech Commun 15:283–300
Polhemus L, Shih L-F, Swan, Karen (2001) Virtual interactivity: the representation of social presence in an on line discussion. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American educational research association, Seattle
Prakken H (2006) Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowl Eng Rev 21:163–188
Scherer KR, Wranik T, Sangsue J, Tran V, Scherer U (2004) Emotions in everyday life: probability of occurrence, risk factors, appraisal and reaction pattern. Soc Sci Inf 43(4):499–570
Searle JR (1975) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Minnesota, pp 344–369
Swan K (2002) Immediacy, social presence and asynchronous discussion. In: Bourne J, Moore JC (eds) Elements of quality online education, vol 3. Sloan Center For Online Education, Nedham, MA, pp 157–172
Verheij B (2003) Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic. Artif Intell Law 11(2–3):167–195
Walton DN (1990) What is reasoning? What is an argument? J Philos 87(8):399–419
Walton DN (1996) Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Walton D (2006) How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue. Artif Intell Law 14(3):177–239
Walton D, Godden D (2005) The nature and status of critical questions in argumentation schemes. The uses of argument. In: Hitchcock D, Farr D (eds) Proceedings of a conference at McMaster university, pp 476–484. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation
Walton D, Gordon TS (2005) Critical questions in computational model of legacy argument, IAAIL workshop series, international workshop on argumentation. In: Dunne PE, Bench-Capon T (eds) Artificial intelligence and law. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 103–111
Walton D, Reed C (2003) Diagramming, argumentation schemes and critical questions. In: van Eemeren FH et al (eds) Anyone who has a view: theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 195–211
Zimmerman J, Ayoob E, Forlizzi J, McQuaid M (2005) Putting a face on embodied interface agents. In: Proceedings of the conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces. Eindhoven Technical University Press, pp 233–248
Acknowledgments
We want to acknowledge Enrica Pesare for her cooperation in collecting and analysing the data and the ‘Body Energy’ fitness centre in Mola di Bari (IT) for kindly enabling us to perform the new WoZ experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Supplement Issue on “Social Signals. From Theory to Applications,” guest-edited by Isabella Poggi, Francesca D’Errico, and Alessandro Vinciarelli.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Novielli, N., Mazzotta, I., De Carolis, B. et al. Analysing user’s reactions in advice-giving dialogues with a socially intelligent ECA. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 2), 487–497 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0420-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0420-1