Abstract
We adopt here a functional approach to the classical comparison between language and biology. We first parallel events which have a functional signification in each domain, by matching the utterance of a sentence with the release of a protein. The meaning of a protein is then defined by analogy as “the constant contribution of the biochemical material composing the protein to the effects produced by any release of the protein”. The proteome of an organism corresponds to an I-language (the idiolect of an individual), and the proteome of a species is equivalent to an E-language (a language in the common sense). Proteins and sentences are both characterized by a complex hierarchical structure, but the language property of ‘double articulation’ has no equivalent in the biological domain in this analogy, contrary to previous proposals centered on the genetic code. Besides, the same intimate relation between structure and meaning holds in both cases (syntactic structure for sentences and three-dimensional conformation for proteins). An important disanalogy comes from the combinatorial power of language which is not shared by the proteome as a whole, but it must be noted that the immune system possesses interesting properties in this respect. Regarding evolutionary aspects, the analogy still works to a certain extent. Languages and proteomes can be both considered as belonging to a general class of systems, that we call “productive self-reproductive systems”, characterized by the presence of two dynamics: a fast dynamics in an external domain where functional events occur (productive aspect), and a slow dynamics responsible for the evolution of the system itself, driven by the feed-back of events related to the reproduction process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloomfield L (1928) A set of postulates for the science of language, Language 2:153–164
Bybee J (2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chomsky N (1986) Barriers. MIT Press, Cambridge
Darmesteter A (1886) La vie des mots étudiée dans leurs significations. Delagrave, Paris
Ducrot O (1984) Le dire et le dit. Editions de Minuit, Paris
Frege G (1892) Über Sinn und Bedeutung, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100:25–50
Holzer J (2002) Concluding reflections, Colloquium “Genome & language – points of convergence and divergence”. Birgitta Forum, Vadstena, Sweden
Hopper PJ, Traugott EC (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jakobson R, Waugh LR (1987) The sound shape of language. de Gruyter, Berlin, NewYork
Ji S (1999) The linguistics of DNA: words, sentences, grammar, phonetics, and semantics. Ann NY Acad Sci 870:411–417
Ji S (2006) The proteome as a molecular language (proteinese), DIMACS Workshop on sequence, structure and systems approaches to predict protein function, Rutgers University, New Jersey
Labov W (2000) Principles of linguistic change. vol II Social factors, Blackwell, Oxford
Lass R (1997) Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lefranc M-P, Lefranc G (2001) The immunoglobulin factsbook. Academic, London
Lightfoot D (1999) The development of language: acquisition, change and evolution. Blackwell, Oxford
Pattee HH (1980) Clues from molecular symbol systems. In: Bellugi/Studdart-Kennedy, Signed and Spoken Language, pp 261–274
Pattee HH (1982) Cell psychology: an evolutionary approach to the symbol-matter problem. Cogn Brain Theory 5:325–341
Raible W (2001) Linguistics and genetics: systematic parallels. In: Haspelmath M, König E, Oesterreicher W, Raible W (eds) Language typology and language universals. de Gruyter, Berlin, NewYork
Saussure F. de (1972) Cours de linguistique générale. Payot, paris
Schleicher A (1863) Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft - offenes Sendschreiben an Herrn Dr. Ernst Haeckel, H Boehlau, Weimar
Sereno MI (1991) Four analogies between biological and cultural/linguistic evolution. J Theor Biol 151:467:507
Stewart J, Coutinho A (2004) The affirmation of self: a new perspective on the immune system. Artif Life 10(3):261–276
Stewart J, Varela FJ (1994) L’intelligence collective des lymphocytes. In: E Bonabeau (ed) L’Intelligence collective. Hermes, Paris, pp 145–156
Strawson PF (1971) Logico-linguistics papers. Ashgate Pub, Aldershot, Burlington
Victorri B, Fuchs C (1996) La polysémie – Construction dynamique du sens. Hermès, Paris
Vincent J-D (1986) Biologie des passions. Odile Jacob, Paris
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Victorri, B. Analogy between language and biology: a functional approach. Cogn Process 8, 11–19 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0156-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0156-5