Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid architecture for the sensorimotor representation of spatial configurations

  • Oral Paper
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the hypothesis that the main representation which underlies human navigation is not static and map-like, but rather is of an inherently sensorimotor nature, i.e. results from a combination of sensory features and motor actions. This is suggested by recent psychological and neurobiological results, and receives further support from an own study of human navigation in manipulated virtual reality environments. To investigate the presumed sensorimotor representation we design a hybrid architecture which integrates a bottom-up processing of sensorimotor features with a top-down reasoning that is based on the principle of maximum information gain. This architecture is implemented in an agent that operates in a VR environment and is able to use a minimum number of exploratory actions to orient itself within this environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Foo P, Warren WH, Duchon A, Tarr MJ (2005) Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31(2):195–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillner S, Mallot HA (1998) Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge in a virtual maze. J Cogn Neurosci 10(4):445–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers B (1982) The “map in the head” metaphor. Environ Behav 14:202–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers B (2000) The spatial semantic hierarchy. Artif Intell 119:191–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laeng B, Teodorescu DS (2002) Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cogn Sci 26(2):207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore T (1999) Shape representations and visual guidance of saccadic eye movements. Science 285(5435):1914–1917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Neumann O, Prinz W (eds) Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York , pp 167–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Schill K, Umkehrer E, Beinlich S, Krieger G, Zetzsche C (2001) Scene analysis with saccadic eye movements: top-down and bottom-up modelling. J Electron Imaging 10(1):152–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky B (1993) Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In: Frank AU, Campari I (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 716. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 14–24

  • Wang RF, Spelke ES (2000) Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition 77:215–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Study supported by DFG SFB TR 8 “Spatial Cognition”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerstin Schill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schill, K., Zetzsche, C. & Wolter, J. Hybrid architecture for the sensorimotor representation of spatial configurations. Cogn Process 7 (Suppl 1), 90–92 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0082-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0082-6

Keywords

Navigation