Abstract
This study details the low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact (CAI) behaviour of flax fibre-reinforced polymer (FFRP) composites. The impact resistance, energy absorption efficiency and residual compressive strength as well as the damage pattern of the FFRP composites are compared with the corresponding features of glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites, and the effect of the stacking sequence of FFRP composites is also investigated. The results show that the cross-ply FFRP composites have the highest impact resistance, whereas the multi-directional ply composites have the lowest impact resistance but the highest energy absorption efficiency. The energy absorption efficiency of the FFRP composites is greater than that of the GFRP composites, but the penetration resistance and residual compressive strength of the FFRP composites are lower than those of the GFRP composites with the same stacking sequence, mainly due to the lower tensile strength and elongation at fracture of the FFRP composites. It is also reported that the damage pattern of the FFRP composites is localised cracking and delamination, unlike the overall delamination failure exhibited in the GFRP composites after CAI testing. Finally, the failure mechanisms of the FFRP and GFRP composites are detailed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A. Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(2):612–26.
Wambua P, Ivens J, Verpoest I. Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(9):1259–64.
Alves C, Silva A, Reis L, Freitas M, Rodrigues L, Alves D. Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites. J Clean Prod. 2010;18(4):313–27.
Lau K, Hung P, Zhu M-H, Hui D. Properties of natural fibre composites for structural engineering applications. Compos Part B Eng. 2018;136:222–33.
Gurunathan T, Mohanty S, Nayak SK. A review of the recent developments in biocomposites based on natural fibres and their application perspectives. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2015;77:1–25.
Hitchen SA, Kemp R. The effect of stacking sequence on impact damage in a carbon fibre/epoxy composite. Composites. 1995;26(3):207–14.
Hosur M, Murthy C, Ramamurthy T, Shet A. Estimation of impact-induced damage in CFRR laminates through ultrasonic imaging. NDT E Int. 1998;31(5):359–74.
Aktaş A, Aktaş M, Turan F. The effect of stacking sequence on the impact and post-impact behavior of woven/knit fabric glass/epoxy hybrid composites. Compos Struct. 2013;103:119–35.
Hazzard MK, Hallett S, Curtis PT, Iannucci L, Trask RS. Effect of fibre orientation on the low velocity impact response of thin Dyneema®composite laminates. Int J Impact Eng. 2017;100:35–45.
Riccio A, Di Felice G, Saputo S, Scaramuzzino F. Stacking sequence effects on damage onset in composite laminate subjected to low velocity impact. Procedia Eng. 2014;88:222–9.
Caminero M, García-Moreno I, Rodríguez G. Damage resistance of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminates subjected to low velocity impact: effects of laminate thickness and ply-stacking sequence. Polym Test. 2017;63:530–41.
Caminero M, García-Moreno I, Rodríguez G. Experimental study of the influence of thickness and ply-stacking sequence on the compression after impact strength of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminates. Polym Test. 2018;66:360–70.
Sebaey T, González E, Lopes C, Blanco N, Maimí P, Costa J. Damage resistance and damage tolerance of dispersed CFRP laminates: effect of the mismatch angle between plies. Compos Struct. 2013;101:255–64.
Sebaey T, González E, Lopes C, Blanco N, Costa J. Damage resistance and damage tolerance of dispersed CFRP laminates: effect of ply clustering. Compos Struct. 2013;106:96–103.
Topac OT, Gozluklu B, Gurses E, Coker D. Experimental and computational study of the damage process in CFRP composite beams under low-velocity impact. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2017;92:167–82.
Evci C. Thickness-dependent energy dissipation characteristics of laminated composites subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct. 2015;133:508–21.
Rivallant S, Bouvet C, Abdallah EA, Broll B, Barrau J-J. Experimental analysis of CFRP laminates subjected to compression after impact: the role of impact-induced cracks in failure. Compos Struct. 2014;111:147–57.
Qiu A, Fu K, Lin W, Zhao C, Tang Y. Modelling low-speed drop-weight impact on composite laminates. Mater Des. 2014;60:520–31.
Shi Y, Swait T, Soutis C. Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct. 2012;94(9):2902–13.
Farooq U, Myler P. Prediction of load threshold of fibre-reinforced laminated composite panels subjected to low velocity drop-weight impact using efficient data filtering techniques. Results Phys. 2015;5:206–21.
Liu D. Characterization of impact properties and damage process of glass/epoxy composite laminates. J Compos Mater. 2004;38(16):1425–42.
De Freitas M, Reis L. Failure mechanisms on composite specimens subjected to compression after impact. Compos Struct. 1998;42(4):365–73.
Bull D, Spearing S, Sinclair I. Observations of damage development from compression-after-impact experiments using ex situ micro-focus computed tomography. Compos Sci Technol. 2014;97:106–14.
Rozylo P, Debski H, Kubiak T. A model of low-velocity impact damage of composite plates subjected to Compression-After-Impact (CAI) testing. Compos Struct. 2017;181:158–70.
Abir M, Tay T, Ridha M, Lee H. On the relationship between failure mechanism and compression after impact (CAI) strength in composites. Compos Struct. 2017;182:242–50.
Körbelin J, Derra M, Fiedler B. Influence of temperature and impact energy on low velocity impact damage severity in CFRP. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2018;115:76–87.
Ulus H, Üstün T, Şahin ÖS, Karabulut SE, Eskizeybek V, Avcı A. Low-velocity impact behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy multiscale hybrid nanocomposites reinforced with multiwalled carbon nanotubes and boron nitride nanoplates. J Compos Mater. 2016;50(6):761–70.
Fu K, Wang H, Chang L, Foley M, Friedrich K, Ye L. Low-velocity impact behaviour of a shear thickening fluid (STF) and STF-filled sandwich composite panels. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;165:74–83.
Li Z, Khennane A, Hazell PJ, Brown AD. Impact behaviour of pultruded GFRP composites under low-velocity impact loading. Compos Struct. 2017;168:360–71.
Li B, Li Z, Zhou J, Ye L, Li E. Damage localization in composite lattice truss core sandwich structures based on vibration characteristics. Compos Struct. 2015;126:34–51.
Perillo G, Vedivik N, Echtermeyer A. Damage development in stitch bonded GFRP composite plates under low velocity impact: experimental and numerical results. J Compos Mater. 2015;49(5):601–15.
Shen Y, Jiang B, Li Y, Jiang X. Low velocity impact response and energy absorption behavior on glass fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Sci China Technol Sci. 2017;60(9):1339–46.
Elamin M, Li B, Tan K. Impact damage of composite sandwich structures in arctic condition. Compos Struct. 2018;192:422–33.
Bensadoun F, Depuydt D, Baets J, Verpoest I, Van Vuure AW. Low velocity impact properties of flax composites. Compos Struct. 2017;176:933–44.
Acknowledgements
Y. Li acknowledges the financial support from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. 11625210), National Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 51873153) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. K. Fu acknowledges the start-up funding from Tongji University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Zhong, J. & Fu, K. Low-Velocity Impact and Compression-After-Impact Behaviour of Flax Fibre-Reinforced Composites. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 33, 431–448 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-019-00158-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-019-00158-8