Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Low-Velocity Impact and Compression-After-Impact Behaviour of Flax Fibre-Reinforced Composites

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study details the low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact (CAI) behaviour of flax fibre-reinforced polymer (FFRP) composites. The impact resistance, energy absorption efficiency and residual compressive strength as well as the damage pattern of the FFRP composites are compared with the corresponding features of glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites, and the effect of the stacking sequence of FFRP composites is also investigated. The results show that the cross-ply FFRP composites have the highest impact resistance, whereas the multi-directional ply composites have the lowest impact resistance but the highest energy absorption efficiency. The energy absorption efficiency of the FFRP composites is greater than that of the GFRP composites, but the penetration resistance and residual compressive strength of the FFRP composites are lower than those of the GFRP composites with the same stacking sequence, mainly due to the lower tensile strength and elongation at fracture of the FFRP composites. It is also reported that the damage pattern of the FFRP composites is localised cracking and delamination, unlike the overall delamination failure exhibited in the GFRP composites after CAI testing. Finally, the failure mechanisms of the FFRP and GFRP composites are detailed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A. Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(2):612–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wambua P, Ivens J, Verpoest I. Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(9):1259–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alves C, Silva A, Reis L, Freitas M, Rodrigues L, Alves D. Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites. J Clean Prod. 2010;18(4):313–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lau K, Hung P, Zhu M-H, Hui D. Properties of natural fibre composites for structural engineering applications. Compos Part B Eng. 2018;136:222–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gurunathan T, Mohanty S, Nayak SK. A review of the recent developments in biocomposites based on natural fibres and their application perspectives. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2015;77:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hitchen SA, Kemp R. The effect of stacking sequence on impact damage in a carbon fibre/epoxy composite. Composites. 1995;26(3):207–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosur M, Murthy C, Ramamurthy T, Shet A. Estimation of impact-induced damage in CFRR laminates through ultrasonic imaging. NDT E Int. 1998;31(5):359–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aktaş A, Aktaş M, Turan F. The effect of stacking sequence on the impact and post-impact behavior of woven/knit fabric glass/epoxy hybrid composites. Compos Struct. 2013;103:119–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hazzard MK, Hallett S, Curtis PT, Iannucci L, Trask RS. Effect of fibre orientation on the low velocity impact response of thin Dyneema®composite laminates. Int J Impact Eng. 2017;100:35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Riccio A, Di Felice G, Saputo S, Scaramuzzino F. Stacking sequence effects on damage onset in composite laminate subjected to low velocity impact. Procedia Eng. 2014;88:222–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Caminero M, García-Moreno I, Rodríguez G. Damage resistance of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminates subjected to low velocity impact: effects of laminate thickness and ply-stacking sequence. Polym Test. 2017;63:530–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Caminero M, García-Moreno I, Rodríguez G. Experimental study of the influence of thickness and ply-stacking sequence on the compression after impact strength of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy laminates. Polym Test. 2018;66:360–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sebaey T, González E, Lopes C, Blanco N, Maimí P, Costa J. Damage resistance and damage tolerance of dispersed CFRP laminates: effect of the mismatch angle between plies. Compos Struct. 2013;101:255–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sebaey T, González E, Lopes C, Blanco N, Costa J. Damage resistance and damage tolerance of dispersed CFRP laminates: effect of ply clustering. Compos Struct. 2013;106:96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Topac OT, Gozluklu B, Gurses E, Coker D. Experimental and computational study of the damage process in CFRP composite beams under low-velocity impact. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2017;92:167–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Evci C. Thickness-dependent energy dissipation characteristics of laminated composites subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct. 2015;133:508–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivallant S, Bouvet C, Abdallah EA, Broll B, Barrau J-J. Experimental analysis of CFRP laminates subjected to compression after impact: the role of impact-induced cracks in failure. Compos Struct. 2014;111:147–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qiu A, Fu K, Lin W, Zhao C, Tang Y. Modelling low-speed drop-weight impact on composite laminates. Mater Des. 2014;60:520–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi Y, Swait T, Soutis C. Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct. 2012;94(9):2902–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farooq U, Myler P. Prediction of load threshold of fibre-reinforced laminated composite panels subjected to low velocity drop-weight impact using efficient data filtering techniques. Results Phys. 2015;5:206–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu D. Characterization of impact properties and damage process of glass/epoxy composite laminates. J Compos Mater. 2004;38(16):1425–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. De Freitas M, Reis L. Failure mechanisms on composite specimens subjected to compression after impact. Compos Struct. 1998;42(4):365–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bull D, Spearing S, Sinclair I. Observations of damage development from compression-after-impact experiments using ex situ micro-focus computed tomography. Compos Sci Technol. 2014;97:106–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rozylo P, Debski H, Kubiak T. A model of low-velocity impact damage of composite plates subjected to Compression-After-Impact (CAI) testing. Compos Struct. 2017;181:158–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abir M, Tay T, Ridha M, Lee H. On the relationship between failure mechanism and compression after impact (CAI) strength in composites. Compos Struct. 2017;182:242–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Körbelin J, Derra M, Fiedler B. Influence of temperature and impact energy on low velocity impact damage severity in CFRP. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2018;115:76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ulus H, Üstün T, Şahin ÖS, Karabulut SE, Eskizeybek V, Avcı A. Low-velocity impact behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy multiscale hybrid nanocomposites reinforced with multiwalled carbon nanotubes and boron nitride nanoplates. J Compos Mater. 2016;50(6):761–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fu K, Wang H, Chang L, Foley M, Friedrich K, Ye L. Low-velocity impact behaviour of a shear thickening fluid (STF) and STF-filled sandwich composite panels. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;165:74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li Z, Khennane A, Hazell PJ, Brown AD. Impact behaviour of pultruded GFRP composites under low-velocity impact loading. Compos Struct. 2017;168:360–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li B, Li Z, Zhou J, Ye L, Li E. Damage localization in composite lattice truss core sandwich structures based on vibration characteristics. Compos Struct. 2015;126:34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Perillo G, Vedivik N, Echtermeyer A. Damage development in stitch bonded GFRP composite plates under low velocity impact: experimental and numerical results. J Compos Mater. 2015;49(5):601–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shen Y, Jiang B, Li Y, Jiang X. Low velocity impact response and energy absorption behavior on glass fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Sci China Technol Sci. 2017;60(9):1339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Elamin M, Li B, Tan K. Impact damage of composite sandwich structures in arctic condition. Compos Struct. 2018;192:422–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bensadoun F, Depuydt D, Baets J, Verpoest I, Van Vuure AW. Low velocity impact properties of flax composites. Compos Struct. 2017;176:933–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Y. Li acknowledges the financial support from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. 11625210), National Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 51873153) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. K. Fu acknowledges the start-up funding from Tongji University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Zhong, J. & Fu, K. Low-Velocity Impact and Compression-After-Impact Behaviour of Flax Fibre-Reinforced Composites. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 33, 431–448 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-019-00158-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-019-00158-8

Keywords

Navigation