Advertisement

Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 589–598 | Cite as

Reprogrammable 3D Mesostructures Through Compressive Buckling of Thin Films with Prestrained Shape Memory Polymer

  • Xiaogang Guo
  • Zheng Xu
  • Fan Zhang
  • Xueju Wang
  • Yanyang Zi
  • John A. Rogers
  • Yonggang Huang
  • Yihui ZhangEmail author
Article

Abstract

The mechanically guided assembly that relies on the compressive buckling of strategically patterned 2D thin films represents a robust route to complex 3D mesostructures in advanced materials and even functional micro-devices. Based on this approach, formation of complex 3D configurations with suspended curvy features or hierarchical geometries remains a challenge. In this paper, we incorporate the prestrained shape memory polymer in the 2D precursor design to enable local rolling deformations after the mechanical assembly through compressive buckling. A theoretical model captures quantitatively the effect of key design parameters on local rolling deformations. The combination of precisely controlled global buckling and local rolling expands substantially the range of accessible 3D configurations. The combined experimental and theoretical studies over a dozen of examples demonstrate the utility of the proposed strategy in achieving complex reprogrammable 3D mesostructures.

Keywords

Mechanically guided 3D assembly Reprogrammable 3D mesostructures Shape memory polymer Buckling Rolling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

X.G. and Z.X. contributed equally to this work. Y.Z. acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11502129 and 11722217) and the Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology. Y.H. acknowledges the support from the NSF (Grant Nos. CMMI1400169, CMMI1534120 and CMMI1635443). X.G. acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11702155).

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang H, Yu X, Braun PV. Three-dimensional bicontinuous ultrafast-charge and -discharge bulk battery electrodes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(5):277–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu H. Stable Li-ion battery anodes by in-situ polymerization of conducting hydrogel to conformally coat silicon nanoparticles. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pikul JH. High-power lithium ion microbatteries from interdigitated three-dimensional bicontinuous nanoporous electrodes. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1732–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun K. 3D printing of interdigitated Li-ion microbattery architectures. Adv Mater. 2013;25(33):4539–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wei TS. 3D printing of customized li-ion batteries with thick electrodes. Adv Mater. 2018;30(16):e1703027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dong K. 3D orthogonal woven triboelectric nanogenerator for effective biomechanical energy harvesting and as self-powered active motion sensors. Adv Mater. 2017;29(38):1702648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Song Z. Origami lithium-ion batteries. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song J, Feng X, Huang Y. Mechanics and thermal management of stretchable inorganic electronics. Natl Sci Rev. 2016;3(1):128–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schaedler TA, et al. Ultralight metallic microlattices. Science. 2011;334(6058):962–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soukoulis CM, Wegener M. Past achievements and future challenges in the development of three-dimensional photonic metamaterials. Nat Photon. 2011;5(9):523–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zheng X, et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science. 2014;344(6190):1373–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tian B. Macroporous nanowire nanoelectronic scaffolds for synthetic tissues. Nat Mater. 2012;11(11):986–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mannoor MS. 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Lett. 2013;13(6):2634–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leong TG. Tetherless thermobiochemically actuated microgrippers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(3):703–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feiner R. Engineered hybrid cardiac patches with multifunctional electronics for online monitoring and regulation of tissue function. Nat Mater. 2016;15(6):679–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu X. 3D printing of living responsive materials and devices. Adv Mater. 2018;30(4):1704821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ahn BY. Omnidirectional printing of flexible, stretchable, and spanning silver microelectrodes. Science. 2009;323(5921):1590–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang W. On-chip inductors with self-rolled-up SiNx nanomembrane tubes: a novel design platform for extreme miniaturization. Nano Lett. 2012;12(12):6283–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grimm D. Rolled-up nanomembranes as compact 3D architectures for field effect transistors and fluidic sensing applications. Nano Lett. 2013;13(1):213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang K. Origami silicon optoelectronics for hemispherical electronic eye systems. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jang KI. Self-assembled three dimensional network designs for soft electronics. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zheng ZG. Light-patterned crystallographic direction of a self-organized 3D soft photonic crystal. Adv Mater. 2017;29(42):1703165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guo SZ. 3D printed stretchable tactile sensors. Adv Mater. 2017;29(27):1701218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cho JH, et al. Nanoscale origami for 3D optics. Small. 2011;7(14):1943–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu Z. 3D-structured stretchable strain sensors for out-of-plane force detection. Adv Mater. 2018;30(26):1707285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen Z, Chen W, Song J. Buckling of a stiff thin film on an elastic graded compliant substrate. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017;473(2208):20170410.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang H. 3D printed photoresponsive devices based on shape memory composites. Adv Mater. 2017;29(33):1701627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yuan C. 3D printed reversible shape changing soft actuators assisted by liquid crystal elastomers. Soft Matter. 2017;13(33):5558–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Compton BG, Lewis JA. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater. 2014;26(34):5930–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kolesky DB. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater. 2014;26(19):3124–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhu W. 3D-printed artificial microfish. Adv Mater. 2015;27:4411–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cangialosi A, et al. DNA sequence-directed shape change of photopatterned hydrogels via high-degree swelling. Science. 2017;357:1126–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang B. Reprocessable thermosets for sustainable three-dimensional printing. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Truby RL. Soft somatosensitive actuators via embedded 3D printing. Adv Mater. 2018;30(15):1706383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hsiao LC, et al. 3D printing of self-assembling thermoresponsive nanoemulsions into hierarchical mesostructured hydrogels. Soft Matter. 2017;13(5):921–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huang Y, et al. Versatile, kinetically controlled, high precision electrohydrodynamic writing of micro/nanofibers. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ye D. Large-scale direct-writing of aligned nanofibers for flexible electronics. Small. 2018;14(21):e1703521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Py C. Capillary origami: spontaneous wrapping of a droplet with an elastic sheet. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98(15):156103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yang Y. Solvent-assisted programming of flat polymer sheets into reconfigurable and self-healing 3D structures. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hawkes E. Programmable matter by folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(28):12441–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mao Y. Programmable bidirectional folding of metallic thin films for 3D chiral optical antennas. Adv Mater. 2017;29(19):1606482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cui J, Adams JGM, Zhu Y. Pop-up assembly of 3D structures actuated by heat shrinkable polymers. Smart Mater Struct. 2017;26(12):125011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cui J, Adams JGM, Zhu Y. Controlled bending and folding of a bilayer structure consisting of a thin stiff film and a heat shrinkable polymer sheet. Smart Mater Struct. 2018;27(5):055009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lin SY, et al. A three-dimensional photonic crystal operating at infrared wavelengths. Nature. 1998;394:251–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Noda S. Full three-dimensional photonic bandgap crystals at near-lnfrared wavelengths. Science. 2000;289:604–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Qi M, et al. A three-dimensional optical photonic crystal with designed point defects. Nature. 2004;429:538–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yan Z. Three-dimensional mesostructures as high-temperature growth templates, electronic cellular scaffolds, and self-propelled microrobots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(45):E9455–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhang Y. Printing, folding and assembly methods for forming 3D mesostructures in advanced materials. Nat Rev Mater. 2017;2:17019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rogers J. Origami MEMS and NEMS. Mrs Bull. 2016;41(2):123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Xu S, et al. Assemble of micro/nanomaterials into complex, three-dimensional architectures by compressive buckling. Science. 2015;347(6218):154–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fan Z, et al. A double perturbation method of postbuckling analysis in 2D curved beams for assembly of 3D ribbon-shaped structures. J Mech Phys Solids. 2018;111:215–38.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Fu H. Morphable 3D mesostructures and microelectronic devices by multistable buckling mechanics. Nat Mater. 2018;17:268–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yan Z, et al. Controlled mechanical buckling for origami-inspired construction of 3D microstructures in advanced materials. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26(16):2629–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhang Y. A mechanically driven form of Kirigami as a route to 3D mesostructures in micro/nanomembranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(38):11757–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaogang Guo
    • 1
  • Zheng Xu
    • 2
  • Fan Zhang
    • 1
  • Xueju Wang
    • 3
  • Yanyang Zi
    • 2
  • John A. Rogers
    • 4
  • Yonggang Huang
    • 5
  • Yihui Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Engineering Mechanics, Center for Mechanics and Materials and Center for Flexible Electronics Technology, AMLTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing and Systems Engineering, School of Mechanical EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.Simpson Querrey Institute and Feinberg Medical School, Center for Bio-Integrated ElectronicsNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  4. 4.Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Neurological Surgery, Center for Bio-Integrated ElectronicsSimpson Querrey Institute for Nano/biotechnology Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  5. 5.Departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Bio-Integrated ElectronicsNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations